<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:52:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by 7777 on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/05/112358.php#comment-736069</link>
<description>MILEY IS JUST A DUMB GIRL THAT WHANTS TO BE IN A PLAYBOY AND HAVE SEX WITH EVERY GYE SHE SEES SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEE IIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA DDDDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBIIIIIIITTTTTTCCCCHHHHHHHHHHH</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">736069@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:52:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tea on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/05/112358.php#comment-723663</link>
<description>Europe would kill you.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">723663@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:22:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ostrova on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/05/112358.php#comment-716020</link>
<description>I&#039;m so tired of all of this nonsense. Anyone care if the teennage boys on the cable shows are showing too much skin? What, NO? </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">716020@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2008 02:12:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CallmeMaddy on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/05/112358.php#comment-715951</link>
<description>Billy Ray knew about the vanity fair articles. I don&#039;t know if he knew about the others. I think I read it on Yahoo news.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">715951@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2008 21:30:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Katelynn Phillips  on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/05/112358.php#comment-715721</link>
<description>Well, I don&#039;t know if Billy Ray even knew this was going on, he might not have been there (not exactly helping his case as a father, but still probably true). I just thought that the pictures she took privately would have a worse effect on pre-teens then the Vanity Fair ones. Either way, both pictures were kind of stupid mistakes. It&#039;s one I hope she doesn&#039;t make again. 

Thanks for comments,

 Katelynn</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">715721@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2008 09:47:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CallmeMaddy on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/05/112358.php#comment-715584</link>
<description>I was going to write an article on this.

Ok, I&#039;m actually the exact opposite of you. I don&#039;t really care about the boyfriend pic, but that wasn&#039;t really that bad. Tons of girls do that and no one really cares. 

I have a huge problem with the Vanity Fair pic. I just cannot handle that her father let someone do this in the name of &#039;art.&#039; This is not art. This is horrible. Honestly, I am a big fan of Miley and I believe she&#039;s really talented, but that&#039;s just disappointing.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">715584@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 May 2008 14:48:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger on Miley&#039;s in Trouble Now </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/05/05/112358.php#comment-715558</link>
<description>Miss Miley is certainly not trying to be a stupid slut like Lohan and Spears.  Those pictures with the boyfriend were fairly mild private moments.  Having been smacked upside the head with them like this, I predict she&#039;ll avoid doing that again.

The Vanity Fair cover is kinda tough.  That more or less came out looking unmistakably slutty.  But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s really fair for folks to hold that against her.  Her people were there at the shoot, and probably should have objected. 

But the specific circumstances are that Vanity Fair is calling to give you the cover of their magazine, and they&#039;re sending probably the most famous, prestigious photographer in the world.  Annie Leibovitz is truly a photographic artist if there is such a thing.  I could easily imagine the Cyrus people maybe having some misgivings, but trusting the judgment of their famous photographer.  

If you want to be crappy with someone over that photo, it probably should be Leibovitz and Vanity Fair mostly.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">715558@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 May 2008 13:04:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>