<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;Kingdom Come&lt;/i&gt; by J.G. Ballard </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:16:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Kevin Eagan on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;Kingdom Come&lt;/i&gt; by J.G. Ballard </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/26/154230.php#comment-714033</link>
<description>You know, I think that professional critics often give established writers more of a pass on average or bad work, especially if that writer already has an &quot;establishment&quot; reputation for writing good literature. It&#039;s kind of like when a new writer&#039;s first novel is far better than an established writer&#039;s last book, yet the established writer will get a better review.

Maybe that&#039;s what has happened here. I&#039;d like to read the novel anyway and see for myself.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">714033@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:16:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Philip Spires on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;Kingdom Come&lt;/i&gt; by J.G. Ballard </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/26/154230.php#comment-713724</link>
<description>Hi Kevin

Just a quick note to confirm that this review is about this book only, not the author. I have read other works by J G Ballard and agree that he is an acquired taste, but one that is worth acquiring. Kingdom Come is a good idea, but one that doesn&#039;t work.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">713724@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:50:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kevin Eagan on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;Kingdom Come&lt;/i&gt; by J.G. Ballard </title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/26/154230.php#comment-713663</link>
<description>You&#039;ve written a very thorough review here, and I totally see your point...but it seems to go against a lot of what I&#039;ve read about this book. Granted, I haven&#039;t yet read &quot;Kingdom Come,&quot; but I&#039;m familiar with Ballard&#039;s previous work. The way you describe this novel seems to suggest that this is a true &quot;ballardian&quot; book, with elements of dystopia, contrasting and elusive morals, and ambivalent characters. So, are you critiquing Ballard as a writer (obviously he&#039;s an acquired taste) or are you critiquing this novel because it doesn&#039;t hold up to his previous works?

Or, are all of the good reviews I&#039;ve read about this book a symptom of book critics who become enamored with certain writers and start to think he/she can do no harm? Because that happens as well.

Anyway, just some thoughts.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">713663@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:58:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>