<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Sun Microsystems and MySQL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:28:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Marten Mickos on Sun Microsystems and MySQL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/21/153256.php#comment-712632</link>
<description>Thanks for writing about MySQL!

I would like to state that this is not a lie by Sun (or anyone else). The decision behind this was made before we got acquired by Sun, so this is not Sun&#039;s decision at all. Any criticism should be directed at me.

I know that our business model decisions may upset people, but at MySQL we also feel we have a responsibility to experiment with business models, because this industry is so new. We produce new GPL code every day, and we have GPLd previously closed source products (MySQL Cluster and Falcon). To do that we depend on a functioning revenue model.

Our commitment to keeping the MySQL server open source continues as before. What this specific issues is about is pluggable add-ons that users can choose to use or not to. The core server will function perfectly with or without them.

Hope this makes sense and feel free to contact me for further clarifications.


Marten
formerly CEO of MySQL AB, now SVP at Sun

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">712632@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:28:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dOgBOi on Sun Microsystems and MySQL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/21/153256.php#comment-712621</link>
<description>And Kevin, why does your URL link to Jonathan Schwartz&#039;s (CEO of Sun Microsystems) blog?  Are you a Sun employee?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">712621@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:26:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by dOgBOi on Sun Microsystems and MySQL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/21/153256.php#comment-712619</link>
<description>The Information Week article contains the information about Sun emphasizing the SAMP stack over the Linux stack.  I did forget to link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/106765&quot;&gt;the article regarding Sun&#039;s locking down features&lt;/a&gt;.  Sorry about that.



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">712619@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:24:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kevin on Sun Microsystems and MySQL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/21/153256.php#comment-712613</link>
<description>Can you provide any evidence - e.g. links - to back up your claims about what Sun will do instead of keeping its promises? Aren&#039;t you a bit early here - assuming they&#039;ll break a promise before seeing the result of the merger?

Also, to call Solaris &quot;Unix-like&quot; is to call the Pacific ocean &quot;sea-like&quot;. Remember that Linux is derived from &quot;Linux-Is-Not-UniX&quot;, like GNU is &quot;GNU is Not Unix&quot;, etc...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">712613@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:12:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Arowolo on Sun Microsystems and MySQL</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/21/153256.php#comment-712610</link>
<description>wow! thats not fear. i just moved from ms sql to mysql and then this...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">712610@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:05:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>