Revisiting 2005's War of the Worlds
Published April 21, 2008
War of the Worlds is by no means limited to metaphors about family, though. Like other works of science fiction, it reflects in otherworldly circumstances the realities of human nature and culture that generations of audiences can recognize. It's no wonder that science fiction and stories about alien life remain popular, or that The War of the Worlds alone has been retold many times as a radio drama, a musical, a TV series and a few films.
I read the book, listened to the Orson Welles radio broadcast, and watched the Spielberg film all around the same time in 2005. Each stands on its own as an interesting and entertaining part of the War of the Worlds universe. I recommend the book, which is still easily readable after 110 years, and the radio play that moved the action from Welles' England to New Jersey (which also serves as the backdrop for some of the 2005 film).
Of the three, the film is likely to be remembered least as a landmark in The War of the Worlds history. The book, obviously, is where the story first unfolded and is the basis for all other versions. The Welles show sent some members of the public into a panic with its newscast-like execution that begins with bulletins interrupting musical numbers with ever-growing alarm. (You can buy the broadcast on CD, or download it from Amazon.com for 89 cents as a “music download” from the album The Ultimate Orson Welles.)
The movie doesn't claim an influence like the book or the broadcast, but it is a notable retelling and updating of the enduring story. One of my favorite parts of this newer version is that the aliens' deadly tripod machines have been buried beneath Earth's surface for years, waiting for the moment when humanity would be primed for the slaughter. It's an interesting juxtaposition of alien life – which, by nature, is foreign and strange to our world – coming from within our own planet, so to speak. (According to the DVD's lone special feature about creating the aliens, Spielberg is the mind behind that from-underneath-they-come idea.)
I also appreciated the retention of Welles' general storyline, the unfolding of the alien arrival and demise, and the author's words at the beginning and end of the film, most notably this line: “With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter.” Many science fiction stories address this tendency of man to become complacent in our daily routine, unaware of its consequences or of something beyond that routine that awaits, be it benevolent or malicious. You can see in the story an indictment of mankind's complacency, and an expression of the ills and needs of both individuals and the masses when ripped from comfort and thrust into a pressure cooker of uncertainty and danger.
- Revisiting 2005's War of the Worlds
- Published: April 21, 2008
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Drama, Video: SF
- Part of a feature: Off the Shelf
- Writer: Melissa Cuppett
- Melissa Cuppett's BC Writer page
- Melissa Cuppett's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
El Bicho,
It takes all kinds to make the world go round, you know. It was a bad movie, in your opinion. My opinion is different from yours.
I enjoyed this movie, even though it never even gets across the point that the invaders are from Mars. The book, which was very literate and clear, is a long read by 21st Century standards, even though Wells is an excellent story-teller.
Wells' story's age shows in its length - written when a book provided the kind of entertainment that TV and movies provide today.
Spielberg does more than just steal from his Juraissic Park stuff - he re-uses the same alien types used in Independence Day. In addition, he uses his basic theme of kids damaged by divorce that he used in ET. I didn't really know that this was a Spielberg film until Ms. Cuppett said so. But the minute she did, all those points fell into place.
Melissa Cuppett did an excellent job with this review - she did far better than I could have (an unfinished War of the Worlds review sits on my damaged hard-drive awaiting resurrection some day).
Finally, and most importantly, the movie deals with Wells' basic these of human complacency - an issue I run into all too often on this site in the political section where I usually hang out.
I was only offering my opinion, Ruvy. Glad the movie worked for you, although what was going on with the birds. They seemed to have a presence in the story that was never explained.
Thanks for your comments.
Ruvy -- I thought the deal with the birds was very vague. I don't know why they were attracted to the tripods (perhaps they were aware the aliens were dying and wanted to feast on them?), but the fact that the birds could touch them revealed that their shields were down and they were thus susceptible to weapons. That's as far as I got.
I thought the deal with the birds was very vague...
That part with the birds was taken straight from Wells' story. In the story's end, the protagonist sees birds feasting upon the dying Martians, and dogs running off with fresh meat as he wanders exhausted through London, hearing the Martians screaming "ulla, ulla" before falling silent in death.
Earlier in the film, since little Rachel's main job is to scream in terror (so it seems) the birds flying off in terror give her reason to be terrified....







"was perhaps marred for some moviegoers by its unfortunate timing."
It was marred for me by being a bad movie. I didn't care about the characters. The son showing up was ridiculous. Spielberg stole from himself by recreating his "raptor in the kitchen" sequence from Jurassic Park. I better not remember anymore or it will ruin the rest of my day.