REVIEW

TV Review: House, MD - "Lines in the Sand" (Revisited)

Written by Barbara Barnett
Published March 25, 2008

It’s incredibly easy to not like Dr. Gregory House in “Lines in the Sand.” He’s obnoxious and more rude than usual to his colleagues; he’s manic about and obsessed with his carpet in an apparent power play with Cuddy. In addition, he seems to respond to (or at least not take seriously) a flirtation from an underage female, the daughter of a patient. Is he, as Cuddy tells him, “a pig?” Everyone seems to chalk his behavior up to House having completely recovered his status as a grade-A jerk along with his limp and cane.

But balancing this obnoxious behavior is the fragility (which Hugh Laurie subtly lends to the portrayal) that frames and gives context to House's actions, his situation, and his connection to this week’s young patient, Adam.

House is living on a precipice. He is back to square one with his pain; and his unresolved issues regarding the shooting could not be more suppressed. He envies his severely autistic patient, who doesn't have to conform to the norms of society, in a way that none of his colleagues can understand in ordinary terms. At the same time, and in a self-loathing frame of mind, he is flattered by the pursuit of an underage young woman, who seems to like him for himself.

House comes to work at the episode’s start to learn that Cuddy has finally replaced the blood-stained carpet in his office. She has removed the last physical evidence from the room that House had been nearly mortally wounded; at the same time she has erased the cruel reminder that House had tried to make a change in his life and failed. The room is back to where it should be — just as House has returned to his physical status quo.

House is angered by Cuddy’s decision to replace the carpeting and spends much energy (and several temper tantrums) in an effort to get the old carpet restored to its rightful place. The bewildered team, Cuddy, and Wilson all believe that House is trying some sort of power play to exert his willfulness.

But what’s really going on with the carpet? Does House want to have a nearby reminder that (as much as one might wish it) you cannot change reality? Is it a reminder to never again attempt it because it leads only back to more disappointment? Or is the carpet a reminder that the changes brought by the ketamine were real? And tangible? And might be achieved again? In the season’s later episodes, we learn that he has continued to find ways to recapture the physical changes (and to a degree the emotional changes) that the ketamine brought (especially in “Insensitive” and “Half-Wit, and to a lesser degree, in "Fetal Position").

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Barbara Barnett grew up on politics and pop culture. Her professional life has been ecclectic and eccentric, having acquired university degrees in biology, Political Science and Public Policy. Her real passions are writing, music, reading sad novels and spy novels, and discussing House MD, and its star Hugh Laurie.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
TV Review: House, MD - "Lines in the Sand" (Revisited)
Published: March 25, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Drama, Video: TV Recap, Video: Television
Part of a feature: Welcome to the End of the Thought Process: House MD
Writer: Barbara Barnett
Barbara Barnett's BC Writer page
Barbara Barnett's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Barbara Barnett
Video: Drama
Video: TV Recap
Video: Television
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 25, 2008 @ 20:32PM — Robin

Thanks Barb for reviewing this one. It is one of my favorite episodes because of its subtley and the Cameron interaction. I am in the camp of House having AS. It explains alot to me like House's sensory sensitivity (tasting lead paint in a cup or out of tuned instruments) and general behavior. Also, David Shore was asked if House had AS or OCD during a internet interview and his answer was "he has aspects of those things that is part of his genius." So it is undiagnosed and the show has not mentioned it again which I think is a good thing because it keeps the mystery of House in place.

#2 — March 25, 2008 @ 20:44PM — Barbara Barnett [URL]

Thanks Robin. I know the topic of House and AS has been discussed ad infinitum over on Television Without Pity and other forums, but it's an interesting question.

As far as the musical stuff, I think House is just an exceptional musician and not explained by AS. He has an extraordinary ear (which also explains his facility with language--the two often go together, along with math). Other people have said that he doesn't have it, but shares some common traits with Aspergers sufferers. I actually liked Cameron at the beginning of season three (not in the premiere, though). I really disliked Wilson. Really, really disliked him.

#3 — March 26, 2008 @ 17:58PM — angelcat2865 (Candy)

Great review as always! This is such an crucial episode in that you can really see that House is reaching a breaking point just before his heartbreaking downhill slide during the Tritter arc.

"I really disliked Wilson. Really, really disliked him."
Like you I was also very upset with Wilson during most of the season. I felt his actions contributed greatly to House's downfall.

#4 — March 26, 2008 @ 18:09PM — Barbara Barnett [URL]

Hi angelcat. LitS (as it is called) is indeed a pivotal episode. Although it is never stated as to why House "needed" his carpeting back the way it was, I think much of the reason had to do exactly with the fact that he was at the breaking point. He held it together even at the beginning of the Tritter arc, but I have to think that had Wilson (and to a lesser extent, Cuddy) not so badly failed him at the beginning he might have come through the ordeal a little less unscathed. His fear, the pain, the pressure from everyone and the lack of pain relief (and his life coming apart at the seams began with this subtly dark episode).

I remember not liking it the first time round because House was so very manic in it, but I think there's an explanation for his wildness--and for his envy of the boy.

Barbara

#5 — March 27, 2008 @ 04:20AM — sue

Another "line" alluded to in this episode is the age of consent. Whether a girl of 17 can make up her own mind who she wants to have sex with. Should legislators make that decision? John Stossel is doing a series on 20/20 about this. Another topical subject they manage to work into an episode. They do that well.

One thing House has that would suggest House doesn't have AS is his uncanny ability to "read" people. He uses visual, physical and intellectual cues that reveal more about a patient than just the symptoms and tests. One of the reasons he can solve cases is that he integrates these cues into the entire picture the patient presents. Often, the diagnosis cannot be made without this information. House is more tuned in to these cues than any other character on the show, and more than most people. Remember, in The Jerk, House was looking for a "tell" in Cuddy's face to see if she was dishonest about Foreman's job cancellation. People with AS have difficulty with this. House does not have difficulty making friends. His relationship with Wilson is evidence of that. House does not make friends with people by choice. Most of House's quirks can be explained by emotional and physical abuse he suffered at the hands of his father.

#6 — April 1, 2008 @ 15:38PM — Mary [URL]

I agree with Sue that Greg House's history of abuse can explain a great deal about him, much more so than Asperger's Syndrome does. The eldest daughter of a friend of mine has AS; interactions with her are always disconcerting, because there's so much about interacting with other people that she has never understood, and never will.

As Sue notes, House is more than usually attuned to clues from his patients and others that most of us have learned to ignore. This hyper-alertness is likely the result of his abusive childhood, where it was a survival skill in an erratic and threatening environment. However useful this ability may be in his profession, processing all this information is also emotionally exhausting, which may be why House envies the autistic child for his ability to totally tune out the waves of information that come from other people.

#7 — April 1, 2008 @ 15:47PM — Barbara Barnett [URL]

I agree with both of you, Sue and Mary. I think House's hyperalertness and his innate distrust of people (and his self-loathing) are all attributable to the treatment he had at his father's hands.

I know very little about AS, and from what I do know, I also do not believe that House has it. Nor do I believe that Cuddy thinks he has it. But I think she ultimately understood that there was some reason he needed the carpeting (maybe even that he doesn't himself undersdtand) and so gave it back to him.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/75147)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments