OPINION

Filmmakers Who Matter: Spike Lee

Written by Jordan Richardson
Published March 18, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3

When the Levees Broke

After the excellent crime drama Inside Man, Spike Lee tackled another documentary. In When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts, the gifted filmmaker surveys the damage of Hurricane Katrina and questions the government response. The film is powerful and is as good a documentary as I’ve seen. Clocking in at four hours, the movie ran in two parts on HBO.

Why Spike Lee Matters

Spike Lee is often equated with racism. Many might even call him a racist. But his movies deal with life and all of the elements in it. Sure, Lee is angry at times, but his antagonism and rage is justified in most cases and fuels his creativity in many profound ways. Without his feeling and emotion in some of his best projects, Lee is just another filmmaker. It’s because he is so controversial, angry, and so damn interesting that his films stand the test of time.

Like with Do the Right Thing, Lee’s movies can be seen as a sort of litmus test for audiences. Some might empathize with some of the characters and deride the others, while a different audience will feel a completely different way. Lee’s ability to conduct an orchestra of colour, feeling, and passion for his audience is part of what makes him special.

Whether he’s frustrating, comical, angry, or thoughtful, Spike Lee is always interesting. Even at a Knicks game, he might be the most mesmerizing person there. He once said that only white people could be racist because black people didn’t have the power to be racist. He never keeps his mouth shut, never holds his tongue, and never hides his opinion.

With Spike Lee, you either love him or you hate him. You either find beauty in his films or you don’t. There’s not much room for middle ground with him. As he grows older, his movies take on a more poignant feel and something unique appears to be on the horizon. Lee has made most of the movies he’s always wanted to make, or so he says, but he’ll likely never stop being appealing. With Miracle at St. Anna due in October 2008, perhaps a new chapter in his life will be set to film.

Suggested Filmography

  • She's Gotta Have It - 1986
  • Do the Right Thing – 1989
  • Jungle Fever – 1991
  • Malcolm X – 1992
  • 4 Little Girls – 1997
  • Summer of Sam – 1999
  • Bamboozled – 2000
  • 25th Hour – 2002
  • Inside Man – 2006
  • When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts - 2006

page 1 | 2 | 3
Jordan Richardson likes to review movies as the Canadian Cinephile here and enjoys reviewing music of all genres as the Canadian Audiophile here.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Filmmakers Who Matter: Spike Lee
Published: March 18, 2008
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Film and TV Business, Video: Drama, Video: Documentary, Video: Comedy, Video: Thriller, Video: Urban
Part of a feature: Filmmakers Who Matter
Writer: Jordan Richardson
Jordan Richardson's BC Writer page
Jordan Richardson's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Jordan Richardson
Video: Film and TV Business
Video: Drama
Video: Documentary
Video: Comedy
Video: Thriller
Video: Urban
All Video Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 18, 2008 @ 16:48PM — Dan Schneider [URL]

'With Spike Lee, you either love him or you hate him. You either find beauty in his films or you don't. There's not much room for middle ground with him.'

Lee is a one dimensional filmmaker w no understanding of narrative nor characterization. He would have been far better as a cinematographer, and let most of the scripting duties fall to competent screenwriters.

And, his direction of actors is not good at all. He coaxes the most facile performances possible- be it actors like Wesley Snipes or John Turturro.

In that sense, he's akin to Steven Spielberg- another filmmaker w a great visual sense, but utterly bankrupt of storytelling powers. Whereas Spielberg goes saccharine, Lee goes moralistic. Either way, w either one, though, the experience after the film is always a disappointment.

So, that's middle ground, and why Spike Lee- save for his status as a black filmmaker, won't be studied in film schools fifty years from now.

#2 — March 18, 2008 @ 18:05PM — bliffle

I agree with Dan. I just reprised "Clockers" last week and while I found it interesting to watch, and thought the Harvey Keitel characterization was interesting, I just couldn't get involved with any of the characters or plots.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/74914)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments