REVIEW

TV Review: House, MD - "Meaning" (Revisited)

Written by Barbara Barnett
Published March 09, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3

While House wends his way through this uncharted territory emotional territory, everyone suspects that he has an agenda; that he’s playing with the patient for his amusement, creating a puzzle for himself where there is none.

Not satisfied with leaving the patient and his family with the status quo, House considers the possibility that the patient’s paralysis might be something curable after hearing the patient grunt (which House translates as speech). But everyone attacks House’s motives. Cameron mocks him; Cuddy accuses; Wilson lectures and scolds. Meeting House at the park, Wilson accuses him of fabricating a mystery for his amusement.

"You didn't tell the wife it was just a grunt?"

"No, of course not."

House retorts that he's built them up with too much false hope and can't let them down, playing up his image as a jerk. It’s a safe fall-back position for him. But in his encounters with the wife and the patient, there is nothing in House’s demeanor, body language or remarks that suggest anything other than sincere belief that the paralyzed, wheelchair-bound patient has something curable. And that there's a chance that his quality of life for both patient and family will be improved. There is an idealism in House's approach to medicine that comes out in moments like this.

At the same time, House’s begins to fear that the ketamine treatment is failing. Skateboarding in the park, House feels a sudden pain in his thigh. Clearly unnerved by this sudden pain, House confides his fears to Wilson, asking him to write a prescription for pain medicine. Dismissing House’s soreness as “middle-aged aches and pains,” Wilson suggests that House is scamming him. I think Wilson’s wrong. If House is concerned enough to tell Wilson, it's got to be either bad or extremely frightening. House has been riding high on his newly pain-free life, suddenly able to do (physically) what he’s been unable to do for years. The return of the pain probably is his deepest fear.

As House leaves his office, Wilson finally acknowledges the extent of House’s fear, reassuring that procedure worked and that it will just take some time to feel good again (in all ways).

There is a second running scene in “Meaning,” a stark contrast to the joyful opening scene. Starkly shot and darkly atmospheric, it is devoid of the the first scene's promise and hopefulness. The gracefulness of the first running scene is replaced by desperation; House is running away — from his fear; from his demons.

But House has an epiphany about his patient, and, late at night, taps at Cuddy’s window, waking her. I loved seeing House, breathing heavily, hot, exhausted, talking a mile a minute, running (not walking) Cuddy through his scientific reasoning. He is excited, delighted and, as Cuddy says, high.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Barbara Barnett grew up on politics and pop culture. Her professional life has been ecclectic and eccentric, having acquired university degrees in biology, Political Science and Public Policy. Her real passions are writing, music, reading sad novels and spy novels, and discussing House MD, and its star Hugh Laurie.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Ketamine : Dreams and Realities Ketamine : Dreams and Realities
Karl Jansen
Book,
The Medical Science of House, M.D. The Medical Science of House, M.D.
Andrew Holtz
Book,
Meaning Meaning
TV Series Episode Video on Demand,

TV Review: House, MD - "Meaning" (Revisited)
Published: March 09, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Television, Video: TV Recap, Video: Drama
Part of a feature: Welcome to the End of the Thought Process: House MD
Writer: Barbara Barnett
Barbara Barnett's BC Writer page
Barbara Barnett's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Barbara Barnett
Video: Television
Video: TV Recap
Video: Drama
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 9, 2008 @ 15:05PM — hl_lover [URL]

Great review, Barbara!

I think one of the key things of this episode, looking at it in the retrospective light of the further events of Season 3 (what is referred to as the 'Tritter Arc'),as you pointed out, was the isolation House was placed in by having his team reject this new 'persona' that he was projecting and by the loss of his two closest friends and supporters. Everything that subsequently happened, including the return of House's pain, can be linked to these events.

What I found to be interesting from these first few episodes of Season 3, too, was that the speculation that House needed to be in pain and on narcotics was a necessary part of his brilliance. Imo this episode showed that it wasn't true...that House fundamentally was brilliant, and being miserable or in pain was not the trigger for his unique ability to process information.

#2 — March 9, 2008 @ 22:10PM — Barbara Barnett [URL]

I completely agree with you HL_L. The tragedy of this episode was that it started House on a downward spiral--one that his colleagues should have suspected would happen. (Especially Wilson). House was in such isolation at the end of the episode. He felt trapped and that no good had come from the ordeal he had put himself through by "choosing life" (as Wilson said.)

#3 — March 10, 2008 @ 18:37PM — NLP

Brilliant review as always, I love your "revisited" reviews! I so enjoyed seeing House be happy; I had hoped that TPTB would not end that joy quite so fast. But everyone's reactions to House foreshadowed all that I hated about Season 3 -- and that was a lot. I agree that what they did to House was unforgivable.

Blowing his idea off as a "hunch" was just stupid and totally unbelievable. Experienced people who have hunches (doctors, law enforcement officers, scientists, etc.), aren't just blindly guessing. They may not be able sometimes to articulate very well what is behind their "hunch," but it is still a deduction made from a lifetime of experience. I try to just keep telling myself, "artistic license," the need to create drama, the need to keep the drama going, etc., etc., yet I still get infuriated!

I just thought everyone around House in Season 3 (especially Cameron & Wilson) was/were acting out of character (from the way they'd been carefully crafted & set up in the 1st 2 seasons). I hated, and still hate that.

#4 — March 12, 2008 @ 15:36PM — Tigerfeet

Barbara.

I have been a silent reader of your articles on House since you "took over" frome Diane Kristine. I love them, they are so well written and expresses most of my own thoughts on House and the fabolous acting of Hugh Laurie. (Are there ANY emotions he is not able to express, or ANY more or less outragous behaviour he can't convey without grace and humour!? He seems to bring out new nuances to his acting all the time.)

Like so many of your readers you have also opened my eyes to the more subtle messages of the episodes and the series as a whole. Thank you! This has also made me read all your previous posts on Thought Process. And for the first time in my life I have read some fan-fiction!

Thanks for enhancing my already huge enjoyment of House and Hugh!


#5 — March 12, 2008 @ 16:57PM — Barbara Barnett [URL]

Thanks NLP and Tigerfeet. I was a big fan of Diane's reviews (and she was a lot quicker to get her reviews up than I am--still don't know how she mangaed that).

I will continue the "revisted" episode reviews while we're waiting for new episodes to appear. This week (and it appears that FOX is rerunning season three in order now. Cool) we have episode 2 of season three, "Cane and Able," which features such a brilliant performance by Hugh L.

And Tigerfeet--welcome to the guilty pleasure of fanfiction!

Up later today: The "Thought Process" House Trivia Quiz

#6 — April 12, 2008 @ 21:40PM — Jane [URL]

How real is House's not understanding self-sacrifice? He is perfectly willing to sacrifice himself, not generally for another person, but for his principles. (Think of the Vogler speech.)

#7 — April 12, 2008 @ 22:07PM — Barbara Barnett [URL]

How real is House's not understanding self-sacrifice? He is perfectly willing to sacrifice himself, not generally for another person, but for his principles. (Think of the Vogler speech.)

I think that House not only understands self-sacrifice, but (in his own) was does it. As you say, he self-sacrifices for a principle (and his very strict--though elaborate--moral code); he also has done it for patients--Carly for one, but also when he's risked suspension or firing for other patients as well (Mark Warner, The Howard Hessman character in Sex Kills, among others).

But I don't think that House perceives what he does as "self-sacrifice" as he said to Wilson in Don't Ever Change. He is self-aware of many things. He is not self-aware of his better nature.

#8 — April 13, 2008 @ 16:29PM — Jane [URL]

And if he doesn't sacrifice for Stacy, I don't know what he does. Now, Wilson is not entirely wrong to say that House, on some level, wants to be miserable. A person can get stuck living in a certain way and be afraid to change, even when they know change would be good. But there's more to House's actions than just fear or self-pity or emotional inertia.

Funny, I haven't done this kind of character analysis since high school English class -- and never thought I'd be doing it on a TV character!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/74629)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments