Book Review - Human Rights Watch: World Report 2008
Published March 03, 2008
I've got a question for you: what are human rights? You probably hear or read the phrase at least once a day in the media, but have you ever stopped to think what it should entail? Don't worry if you haven't because I'd lay odds you're not alone. The phrase is bandied about so much these days that if it ever had an agreed-upon meaning in the eyes of the general public it's been long forgotten.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights created by the United Nations in 1948 has 30 articles, most of which will probably sound familiar to any of us who live in countries which have a Bill of Rights or the equivalent. You know the usual stuff: everybody will be treated the same regardless of race, colour, sex, religion, creed; no one will be subjected to torture or cruel and inhuman punishment; everyone is entitled to protection under the law and nobody is above the law; everybody has the right to privacy, freedom of thought, and freedom of opinion.
Over the years its of course been updated and some specifics have been added like the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Of course that these addendum were needed goes to show just how well people were complying with the original declaration. If countries had been treating people equally regardless of sex there would have been no need for any convention dealing specifically with violence against women.

That's the thing, isn't it? Everybody talks a good game — our governments in the West especially — but there's probably not a government in the world that's not guilty of a violation of somebody's human rights. Take a look at the partial listing of articles I've mentioned above, and you'll notice that the United States, who have one of the most comprehensive Bill Of Rights of any country, has contravened every single article listed.
Of course, they aren't the only ones; according to the organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) there's a distressingly huge number of countries all over the world making a mockery of the declaration according to Human Rights Watch World Report 2008, their annual report on how well countries around the world are abiding by the statutes put forward more then fifty years ago.
After my first glance through the volume I couldn't decide which was the more depressing thought - the fact that it exists at all, that it is over 560 pages in length, or that it doesn't list all the countries or all the categories where there were infringements of Human Rights around the world in the year 2007. I think it's the last one that bothers me the most, especially when the writers say that they really have no way of knowing how much they miss, because there aren't many countries that are going to give you access to documentation proving they've been violating the rights of their population.
- Book Review - Human Rights Watch: World Report 2008
- Published: March 03, 2008
- Type: Review
- Section: Books
- Filed Under: Books: Nonfiction, Books: Philosophy, Books: Politics and Affairs, Culture: Society, Politics: Law and Rights, Review
- Writer: Richard Marcus
- Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
- Richard Marcus's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
- RSS Feeds
- All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Richard Marcus
Books: Nonfiction
Books: Philosophy
Books: Politics and Affairs
Culture: Society
Politics: Law and Rights
Review
All Books Articles
Richard Marcus's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments


Richard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at 






