<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;The Other Boleyn Girl&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:36:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by The 49th Assassin on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;The Other Boleyn Girl&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/03/01/144148.php#comment-703248</link>
<description>Movie lacked so much. &quot;no sex?&quot; What the hell were you watching the whole movie was based on sex very bad movie. Very little wait no &quot;no action&quot;. Made history very boring. The jokes thrown in the lines (script) were not even remotely funny. Very Dry. My girl fell asleep it was so bad.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">703248@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:36:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fred on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;The Other Boleyn Girl&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/03/01/144148.php#comment-700025</link>
<description>Sad experience</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">700025@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:19:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;The Other Boleyn Girl&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/03/01/144148.php#comment-699675</link>
<description>WOWSERS! What a great flick! It shows you can make a good movie without all the sex.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">699675@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:25:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fran on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;The Other Boleyn Girl&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/03/01/144148.php#comment-699529</link>
<description>OH! this movie was very nice. I loved it!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">699529@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:35:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Toria on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;The Other Boleyn Girl&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/03/01/144148.php#comment-699182</link>
<description>I liked this movie. It was a bit more accurate than that of the TUDORS series on SHOW TV. Also, it didn&#039;t have so much blah blah sex in it. I went for the history and not the sex, so I rather enjoyed it. However though there was very, very little truth in the trashy TUDOR series on TV. My advise to others is not to watch it. It is filled with nothing but trashy lie after lie.

I was however very pleased that the truth came out about Mary Boleyn, who had the only living child of Henry Tudor, (Henry Tudor Carey) Should be Henry Tudor Jr. and not Carey by rights. This child of Mary Boleyn, as well has living descendant today. I happen to one of them.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">699182@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:20:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by vicki on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;The Other Boleyn Girl&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/03/01/144148.php#comment-699077</link>
<description>Spend your money diffrently and buy the book it was so much better then the movie. I&#039;ve been looking forward to this movie coming out for 6 months now, and now wished I hadn&#039;t seen it. It doesn&#039;t due the story justice. I know they have to shrink down the story for the big screen but they left out some key elements and added in some &quot;hollywood&quot; that I could have done without. Just my opinion but I&#039;d stick with the book.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">699077@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Mar 2008 02:26:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>