<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:28:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Alexandria on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-702048</link>
<description>The lesson I learned was that this lollipop review got more traffic and more emotion than most of my reviews (combined!).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">702048@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:28:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by El Bicho on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-702045</link>
<description>Maybe the lesson is it&#039;s a thankless task volunteering for material to help out a woefully stacked section.

Mr. Plow, if the phrases &quot;there is no alcohol&quot; and &quot;While you won&#039;t get a buzz off them&quot; don&#039;t make that abundantly clear, I am not sure what would.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">702045@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:41:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mr. Plow on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-702021</link>
<description>Perhaps what anyone who is thinking of getting them would like to know is &quot;Do they affect your taste buds and nothing else?&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">702021@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:32:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anna Creech on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-699366</link>
<description>Matt, Bennett, &amp; Josh: Calm down, boys. Maybe the lesson here is that it&#039;s hard to write a substantive review of a lollipop without sounding like a press release for the company?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">699366@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:39:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mat Brewster on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-698376</link>
<description>Personally, I&#039;d like to know how many licks it takes to get to the center, and then, perhaps, how many other orifices El Bicho tried to stick the pops into.

What the crap, people!  It&#039;s a dang lollipop, how much more of a review do you want?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">698376@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:07:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Josh on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-698370</link>
<description>Looks to me like two paragraphs of history, a paragraph on the product, and a paragraph to help interested parties obtain the product.  I don&#039;t see the problem.  Hell, it&#039;s a lollipop.  How many complexities are there to cover?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">698370@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:20:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bennett on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-698365</link>
<description>Honestly, how much more can you say about a flavored lollipop?  I think the author did a hell of a job in stretching out the article to meet the requirements.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">698365@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:03:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anna Creech on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-698354</link>
<description>I don&#039;t think the 300 minimum is a problem. Maybe more description of the product? You spent two paragraphs on absinthe and two sentences on what you thought of the pops.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">698354@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:51:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by El Bicho on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-698235</link>
<description>People would want them if they enjoyed the taste of licorice, which is why I described them as &quot;tasty treats.&quot;  Sorry, if the review isn&#039;t up to your standards, but other than dealing with the perception that there may be alcohol in them, there&#039;s not much else to say about the item.  What else do you want to know?  The number of licks it takes to finish?  The composition of the stick?  If you have a problem with the new word minimum being 300 words, take it up with management because I didn&#039;t set the limit.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">698235@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:12:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anna Creech on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-698176</link>
<description>What Phillip said. Not much reviewing going on in this article.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">698176@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:19:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn on Product Review: Absinthe Lollipops</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/26/102715.php#comment-698132</link>
<description>So people would want these because of... marketing?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">698132@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:17:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>