OPINION

Reactions to Oscars 2008

Written by moviejohn
Published February 26, 2008

I am not going to beat around the bush in saying that this year’s Oscars has actually been the most satisfying in quite a long time. After being disappointed again and again at the Academy’s questionable choices, this is the first time in many years where I feel they have gained some true credibility in going for real quality over popularity. And despite the slightly noticeable sense of exhaustion in the aftermath of the writers’ strike, the ceremony delivered more than its share of heartfelt speeches and riotous one-liners thanks to host Jon Stewart.

As most everyone guessed, the Coens’ No Country for Old Men took home Best Picture as well as Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Supporting Actor for Javier Bardem, who became the first Spanish actor to ever win the Oscar. One memorable highlight was the humorously laconic reaction of younger brother Ethan Coen who, after only saying “Thank you" after accepting the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay, said upon their return to the podium for Best Director, “I don't have a lot to add to what I said earlier. Thank you.” Meanwhile, Bardem, after thanking his cast and crew in English, dedicated the second half of his speech to his mother in Spanish, which sounded so natural and moving even if you did not understand exactly what he was saying.

The win I really let out a whoop for, however, was Marion Cotillard’s Best Actress award for her towering performance La Vie en Rose, making her the first French actress to win since Simone Signoret in 1960 and the first one to win for a performance in a foreign language since Sophia Loren in 1962. This surprised many pundits who thought the Academy would not be able to get past the foreign language barrier and vote for Julie Christie instead (though I predicted it). But few will contest that the Academy really vouched for sheer quality this time around over simple veteran respect or sentimentality and I think most people will also agree that Cotillard gave a more sincere and heartfelt acceptance speech than anything Christie would have delivered. Indeed, no other winner in the evening was more speechless and ecstatic about their win as she shouted, "Thank you, life! Thank you, love!" More attentive viewers also noticed the enthusiastically surprised reaction of fellow nominee Cate Blanchett upon presenter Forest Whitaker’s announcement of Cotillard’s name as the winner.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Joo-Wang John Lee is a computer programmer at Dartmouth Medical School by day and a movie critic by hobby. Upon insistent suggestion from people around him, he finally decided to start critiquing movies in writing instead of just verbal form among his friends. His writings can be found at John's Movie Blog.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Reactions to Oscars 2008
Published: February 26, 2008
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Awards Shows, Video: Film and TV Business
Writer: moviejohn
moviejohn's BC Writer page
moviejohn's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by moviejohn
Video: Awards Shows
Video: Film and TV Business
All Video Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 26, 2008 @ 01:44AM — El Bicho [URL]

"I think most people will also agree that Cotillard gave a more sincere and heartfelt acceptance speech than anything Christie would have delivered."

Considering we'll never know what Christie would have delivered, why would anyone agree to that?

"Now that she has the Oscar hurdle over her, she can continue to take even more impressive artistic risks in future projects."

If you followed her career or read her interviews, it doesn't seem like the potential for an Oscar ever affected the risk of her choices, so I don't see why that would change now.

"I somehow doubt the Oscars will be inviting Michael Moore up to the podium anytime soon."

Based on what?

#2 — February 26, 2008 @ 02:11AM — John [URL]

For Christie's possible speech, I am basing on what she said when she won the SAG award, which was certainly stately and professional but not nearly as heartfelt.

As for Tilda Swinton, I was never meaning to imply that she was an actress who worked solely for the Oscar. I should have really said that she has the award as a bonus because she has shown her skills in a mainstream project like Michael Clayton. I am meaning to say that she will be more encouraged to take more challenges that more people will hopefully see.

Finally, for Michael Moore, did you see his "Bowling for Columbine" acceptance speech five years ago? I think while the Iraq war is still going on, many people in the Academy will fear he will give another speech like that.

#3 — February 26, 2008 @ 02:59AM — El Bicho [URL]

The war had only been going for less than a week in 2003, and if it bothered the Academy, then why nominate him again?

"many people in the Academy will fear he will give another speech like that."

Got any proof of that? I haven't read any Academy members speak out about it. Considering the perceived politics of those in Hollywood, more members agree with him then disagree.

#4 — February 26, 2008 @ 03:03AM — El Bicho [URL]

The war had only been going for less than a week in 2003, and if it bothered the Academy, then why nominate him again?

"many people in the Academy will fear he will give another speech like that."

Got any proof of that? I haven't read any Academy members speak out about it. Considering the perceived politics of those in Hollywood, more members agree with him then disagree.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/74260)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments