<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Be Kind, Rewind&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:38:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by chris on Movie Review: &lt;em&gt;Be Kind, Rewind&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/24/092128.php#comment-703646</link>
<description>Sorry mate - this film is not good and not worth going to see.  I just wasted two hours and £14 on it and thought it no better than the plot of Cronation Street or Neighbours.  
The plot, such as it is, wastes little time in getiing worse as it goes on.  It opened badly, and got worse, albeit for the copy-cat Ghostbusters and Rush Hour 2 parts. 
Naff ending that finished abruptly and too corny.  
Bull doze the shop and scrap the film.  Wouldn&#039;t even suggest getting the DVD to confirm what I&#039;m saying.  I promise you, it&#039;s lower than average!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">703646@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:38:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>