<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:09:38 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697800</link>
<description>The Golden Compass, best visual effects? Really? ....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697800@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:09:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697796</link>
<description>Two awards in and I&#039;m 1 for 2.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697796@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:54:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bliffle on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697502</link>
<description>Oscar for Best Suit Tailor goes to George Clooneys costumer in &quot;Michael Clayton&quot;. Perfect.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697502@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:17:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jordan Richardson on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697437</link>
<description>Chomet&#039;s good, but he&#039;s not really done many films. Les Triplettes de Belleville was good and his short The Old Lady and the Pigeons was entertaining, but I&#039;d like to see more from him before I&#039;d personally cite him. He has a new film coming in 2009, but there aren&#039;t many details about it.

Other than Chomet, there&#039;s Michel Ocelot (who has had stuff released through Ghibli) and obviously Vincent Paronnaud, who did Persepolis. Rene Laloux MAY be someone I&#039;d consider, but I don&#039;t know that French animation really stands out apart from them in my mind. Do you have any other recommendations, zingzing?

As for Japanese animation, there&#039;s a long list of stuff that&#039;s impressed me:

Satoshi Kon, obviously. His films are anything but flashy and his stories are immense.

Osamu Dezaki is remarkably talented, too, although I&#039;m embarrassingly ignorant of most of his work. His 2007 film Clannad was quite nicely done.

Shigeyuki Hayashi (Rintaro) is obviously a great one. 2001&#039;s Metropolis is an awesome film.

Yoshiaki Kawajiri is another good one.

You already mentioned Miyazaki and Isao Takahata, who are truly great.

There&#039;s also Katsuhiro Otomo, Shinji Aramaki, Shinichir&amp;#333; Watanabe, and Mamoru Oshii. Personally, I find anime to be one of the more compelling and adventurous art forms in the world right now. Nobody is taking the strides the Japanese are taking with animation, but there is some good stuff out there to check out.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697437@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:56:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by zingzing on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697435</link>
<description>guppy... french animation is the shit.  have you never heard of sylvain chomet?  and persepolis is amazing.  the animation is very fluid and life-like in its simplicity.  

japanese animation is certainly good, although a bit flashy.  miyazaki is a true master, as is his partner at studio ghibli... but there hasn&#039;t been much coming out of japan lately that has really impressed me.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697435@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:28:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brandon Valentine on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697401</link>
<description>Ditto Dusty on Diving Bell.  It deserves a &quot;Best Picture&quot; nom.  Let&#039;s hope it brings home the bacon for cinematography.

Good article Chris.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697401@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:50:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian aka Guppusmaximus on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697391</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;but it&#039;s simplicity and primarily black and white look give it a uniqueness that is refreshing without being overbearing.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I guess... To me,that kind of animation seems to be a cop out of sorts. I think it would down-play the importance of such a message but that&#039;s my opinion. 
&lt;br&gt;
Honestly, the animation isn&#039;t really that unique or refreshing,no offense. It kinda reminds me of &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=sj2XOhC1YlM&quot;&gt;Madeline&lt;/a&gt; but I&#039;m trying not to be rude. It doesn&#039;t seem like the french have progressed in this area which is rather odd considering that they are supposed to be the ultimate destination for art. Though, I don&#039;t think Madeline was made in France.
&lt;br&gt; 
I guess, I just feel that &lt;i&gt;Paprika&lt;/i&gt; was absolutely brilliant &amp; it didn&#039;t have to touch upon actual human tragedy to stand out...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697391@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:18:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697360</link>
<description>Was not aware of Greenwood&#039;s ineligibility. Do you know where the material appeared originally?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697360@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:38:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dusty Somers on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697355</link>
<description>Greenwood&#039;s score for There Will Be Blood wasn&#039;t eligible for Original Score, since much of the music had been composed for other works originally. 

It&#039;s a shame that The Diving Bell and The Butterfly wasn&#039;t nominated for Best Picture - it&#039;s definitely the best film of the year. Hopefully it will at least pull out a win in the cinematography category, but it&#039;s extremely doubtful that it will win in the directing or adapted screenplay.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697355@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:31:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697335</link>
<description>It wasn&#039;t? Man what am I thinking of then... exposing my ignorance once again....

As for Sweeney, well that was just a flat out screw up, I know it&#039;s not an original.. busted.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697335@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:24:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by El Bicho on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697331</link>
<description>How could Sweeney Todd be up for original screenplay?  Even Borat, which was all original material, was nominated for adapted because it was based on the TV show.

You are right that films need to be shown in their home countries first but City of God was not nominated in consecutive years.  It wasn&#039;t nominated for Best Foreign Film and if it had been, it would not have been ineligible the following year.  

Rule 14 from the Academy website: Films nominated for the Best Foreign Language Film Award shall not be eligible for Academy Award consideration in any category in any subsequent awards year. 

I hope you are right about Sound Mixing because Kevin O&#039;Connell from Transformers is 0-20 at the Oscars.  Susan Lucci thinks that&#039;s a bad losing streak.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697331@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:20:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jordan Richardson on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697277</link>
<description>Ah, that&#039;s right. Thanks for clearing that up, Chris. 

Nice article, btw.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697277@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:10:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697268</link>
<description>No problem, Brian! Persepolis is a good, personal film. The animation is simplistic in nature but has a very distinctive feel and is well worthy of its nomination. It very easily cold have been a live action, but it&#039;s simplicity and primarily black and white look give it a uniqueness that is refreshing without being overbearing.

Jordan,
It was a 2006 film, but it was not released theatrically in the US until 2007, making it an eligible film. 2006 it would have been eligible in the Best Foreign Language, but not for Best Animated, since it hadn&#039;t had a US release yet, now that it has, it is. I hope that made sense.... An example of a film nominated for awards in consecutive ceremonies is City of God, one year as Best Foreign and the next it was up for Best Director.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697268@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:47:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian aka Guppusmaximus on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697258</link>
<description>Sorry if I misread, I tend to do that when someone else mentions a film(or cd) I love...

I agree that it helps that &lt;i&gt;Persepolis&lt;/i&gt; was nominated though,imo, the movie looks pretty weak in the animation department &amp; doesn&#039;t even compare to Paprika. I guess,maybe, they are focusing on the storyline which,hopefully, will open some doors for other films.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697258@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:14:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jordan Richardson on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697257</link>
<description>I thought Paprika was a 2006 film.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697257@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:13:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697249</link>
<description>Thanks, Brian. DOn&#039;t get me wrong, I did not mean to imply that Paprika was better than Ratatouille. I feel the Pixar film was by far the best animated feature of the year. Period, end of story. It even made my top ten. It is beeautifully animated, wonderfully told, it was just a wonderful movie. 

I do agree with the much in need of update attitudes in AMerica regarding animation, at least in the mainstream. It does help that Persepolis was nominated, it was a mature, adult animated feature.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697249@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:50:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian aka Guppusmaximus on My Oscar Predictions: 2008 Edition</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/22/073332.php#comment-697247</link>
<description>Great Predicitions...

Here is where I am out of my territory but I would have to agree with you that &lt;i&gt;Paprika&lt;/i&gt; was a far better film than &lt;i&gt;Ratatouille&lt;/i&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;
The major difference is that Satoshi Kon&#039;s masterpiece is a film for adults &amp; showcases some of the best artwork,storyline &amp; music I have ever witnessed in Anime since &lt;i&gt;Ghost in the Shell&lt;/i&gt; &amp; &lt;i&gt;Akira&lt;/i&gt;. IMHO,I believe this movie surpasses those two pioneering titles.
&lt;br&gt;
The big problem in this country is that animation is still considered for children &amp; movies like &lt;i&gt;Ratatouille&lt;/i&gt; do not showcase the imagination or cover the social &amp; mental ground that anime does. For animation, these movies can make you forget that you&#039;re watching animation &amp; I feel that they could hold up against the best live-action movies we have to offer.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love alot of these Pixar films just like the next person but I do feel they have lost their innovation over time &amp; they are constantly immature. I would love to see Pixar release an adult title that would rival the work by Katsuhiro Otomo(Akira,Steamboy) or Satoshi Kon...
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697247@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:45:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>