OPINION

Three Cheers for The Sporting Life?

Written by Realist
Published February 18, 2008
page 1 | 2

This is where the Olympics loses me. If the Olympics really were about athletic competition, then the events would focus on the athletes. There is far more time spent waving national flags and playing national anthems than there is actual "national" competition. The individual athletes and their achievements get lost in the shuffle.

From the time that the modern Olympics were begun, it rapidly became a means of international diplomatic maneuvering at the expense of the athletes, most blatantly during the 1936 Olympics in Hitler's Berlin. The plan then was to demonstrate to the world the "obvious" superiority of Naziism, but that strategy was upset by the athletic victories of a Swartzer untermensch. After WWII, the venues and the politics shifted, with the opposing philosophies changing from democracies and monarchies vs authoritarian dictatorships to capitalist authoritarian nations vs state authoritarian nations, but the athlete never really regained prominence.

The athletes could only gain the spotlight when they did something personal in protest against conditions in their homelands (see: Tommie Smith and John Carlos, Summer 1968), or when they became the pawns of international struggle as in Munich in 1972. In both cases, the exploits of the individuals were lost in the larger antagonisms.

The pending games in Beijing are already causing more hate and discontent among nations than they are fostering friendship and understanding. Host nation China expects international athletes to keep their mouths shut concerning their critiques of Chinese life while at the same time announcing that everyone who enters the country to participate in Olympic events will be thoroughly investigated. In return, activists are attempting to pressure Olympic corporate sponsors to use their influence on the Chinese government to take a more pro-active role in ameliorating the Darfur crisis.

Do attempt to convince me that any of this has any connection to athletics whatsoever. Is there really any benefit for the competitors themselves? The obvious answer is no.

Athletics should be about the individuals and their efforts, not about the nation which seeks to benefit without a quid pro quo. Take the jingoistic nationalism and the flag-waving out of the Olympics, and I might care enough to pay a little attention. But until then, I'd rather watch the neighbor kids pretending to be some sport hero while playing in the street.

At least kids, unlike their adult contemporaries, are expected to play - and pretend to greatness.

page 1 | 2
You don't have to be Pessimist to become Realist - but it certainly helps!
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Three Cheers for The Sporting Life?
Published: February 18, 2008
Type: Opinion
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Books: Business and Economics, Culture: Business and Economics, Culture: Celebrity, Culture: Society, Politics: International
Writer: Realist
Realist's BC Writer page
Realist's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Realist
Books: Business and Economics
Culture: Business and Economics
Culture: Celebrity
Culture: Society
Politics: International
All Sports Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 18, 2008 @ 11:09AM — Dr Dreadful [URL]

While you're right that the Olympics tend to be a media magnet for prancing political primadonnas, you lose me when you claim that the exploits of the athletes get lost in the crush.

It's sadly true that the 1968 Games, for example, are remembered mainly for the Black Panther salutes of African-American medal winners, and the '72 Games for the massacre of the Israeli athletes. It is also true, though, that since the end of the Cold War, the Games have been far less politically contentious.

People's concerns about the Chinese are legitimate, and it's natural that questions should be asked of them since they're hosting such a major international event. However, once the Games start, we'll be turning on our TVs and opening our newspapers to follow the sporting performances, not the political ones.

#2 — February 18, 2008 @ 11:13AM — Joe [URL]

I stopped watching the Olympics as well as most sporting events beyond high school level. Most sports have nothing to do with athletics anymore. It's all about $, face time for sponsors and tv ratings. The spirit of sports is lost forever.
Metal on bros,
Joe

#3 — February 19, 2008 @ 14:11PM — Pee Kay [URL]

I think you meant BRANDI CHASTAIN not MIA HAMM. Mia retired on her own accord. Brandi was shown the door b/c she was OLD.

#4 — February 20, 2008 @ 15:57PM — Marcia L. Neil

Actually, Chastain became involved in a telephone-call networking operation that disturbed other people not residing in that region to play sports.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/74005)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments