<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on A Modest Proposal For Reforming The Health Insurance Industry</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:36:32 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by bliffle on A Modest Proposal For Reforming The Health Insurance Industry</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/16/025317.php#comment-697856</link>
<description>The insurance companies have created a marvelous illusion: that somehow Health Care depends on Health Insurance. They&#039;ve employed this illusion to place themselves at the center of the entire &quot;Health Industry&quot; and thus reinforce their monopolistic grip on that entire segment of society. They&#039;ve created the notion that you can&#039;t have Health Care without Health Insurance.

Now, we have presidential candidates who are seriously advancing proposals to enslave US citizens to Insurance companies though &#039;mandates&#039;, which put one in mind of Indentured Servitude, which is the (only slightly) less ugly sister of slavery.

Hasn&#039;t it occured to people yet that the jury-rigged facade of capitalistic health care has completely collapsed?

Nothing could be further from the truth.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697856@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:36:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rod Reasen II on A Modest Proposal For Reforming The Health Insurance Industry</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/16/025317.php#comment-697812</link>
<description>It is interesting that most claims for reform are directed at insurance companies not the system as a whole.  I find it mind bogling to believe that Americans are as foolish as many may make them out to be.  The health care system is made up of three primary components:  You and Me; doctors and facilities and payers.

The main problem with our current system and the direction that we should focus is TRANSPARENCY. 

You and I don&#039;t actually know where most of the cost comes from in a bill.  I submit that if we were fully aware of all charges from all parties we might have a basis for discussing change.  Until we have this, we are simply submitting ourselves to idle chatter.  

Rod Reasen II
President TriplePoint Consulting
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">697812@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:17:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DHL on A Modest Proposal For Reforming The Health Insurance Industry</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/16/025317.php#comment-696321</link>
<description>The catastrophic illness plans are interesting, but may not contribute much to solving the problem of providing coverage to those currently uninsured. The product idea is not new, insurance companies do offer &quot;high-deductibles&quot; to cater to individuals who have affordability problems. If it is not mandatory, not all car owners may buy liability insurance. Our &quot;health care&quot; crisis is not just a health insurance crisis. In reality, health insurance companies are becoming the popular whipping boys. They are blamed for inefficiency, and bureaucracy, and being profit-minded (Blue Cross/Blue Shield are not-for-profit) at the expense of patients&#039; well-being. We are not sure if we can safely remove the roles of insurance companies from our system without creating another form of crisis. Substituting the insurance companies with a government body may not be a better solution, as seen in the public transportation system or our public education system.

The aging population, the availability of more expensive advanced technology that treats diseases that were terminal previously, and even economic growth all contributed to our rising health care expenses as a nation. In the book entitled &quot;The Fattening of America,&quot; by Eric A Finkelstein and Laurie Zuckerman, it was reported that over two-thirds of Americans are overweight or obese. Over the past three decades, the number of obese Americans has more than doubled, across the socioeconomic spectrum, and for all racial and ethnic groups, most dramatically, for America&#039;s children. According to Eric, America&#039;s growing waistline is a by-product of our economic and technological success. It has been estimated that the annual cost of overweight and obesity in the U.S. is $122.9 billion, a sum that is comparable to the economic costs of cigarette smoking.

All health care crisis has to be tackled on all fronts, and as you pointed out, reform could involve a grassroot movement. You suggested that we should band together to limit the role of insurers with or without help from the government. On the positive note, grassroot organizations have already started to direct the effort in discouraging smoking, addressing obesity, and adopting a healthy lifestyle. These are sure steps in bringing health care burden under better control in the long run.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">696321@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by P.Marlowe on A Modest Proposal For Reforming The Health Insurance Industry</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/02/16/025317.php#comment-696196</link>
<description>good article... Long article... really, really long, but good!

Marlowe</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">696196@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:54:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>