Movie Review: There Will Be Blood
Published February 06, 2008
Early buzz about the movie set the bar unnaturally high for Daniel Day-Lewis’ performance as the oilman, Daniel Plainview. In a rare occasion, all the expectations are trumped. For the nearly two hours and forty-minutes the actor’s on the screen, he never takes a breath as anyone but Plainview. The highest compliment that can be extolled upon the actor is that he makes a character like Plainview so viewable and memorable. His performance ranks among the greats in many aspects.
Day-Lewis easily matches Robert De Niro’s bruising performance in Raging Bull, as a man whose personal demons threaten to destroy him. The performance is even comparable to Jack Nicholson’s performance in One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest, in detailing a man that walks a fine line between coherence and insanity. There’s not enough that can be said about Daniel Day-Lewis’ work in this film.
The other elements of the film are also top-notch in every aspect. Each actor gives an exceptional performance, especially Paul Dano and Dillon Freasier. Dano believably goes toe-to-toe with Day-Lewis as Eli Sunday in the film’s most squirm-inducing moments, including the incredible finale (which also includes an instant classic of a quote). It’s a shame that Dano didn’t get an Oscar nod for Supporting-Actor.
Freasier plays Plainview’s son with an incredibly stoic presence. I’ve never been one that particularly cared for child actors, but this kid has tremendous talent. It’s a shame I can’t talk more about his performance and meaning to the film, for he’s a key aspect to Plainview’s character and the film’s plot development.
One of the other standout features of the film is the score. If Dano’s overlook from the Academy can be considered a shame, it’s an absolute travesty that the Academy ruled Jonny Greenwood’s score ineligible for Oscar-contention. Greenwood (who is the main hand behind the genius that is Radiohead) creates musical pieces for the film that range from sublime, moving compositions to nerve-shattering, pulsating string-arrangements. The film also employs works by Brahms and Arvo Part that complements the atmosphere perfectly.
Still, the greatest praise for There Will Be Blood belongs to the writer/director, Paul Thomas Anderson. With his fifth picture, Anderson has become one of the most important American directors that still makes films. There were many moments when I had to remind myself it was directed by Anderson, and not somebody like John Huston or Stanley Kubrick. The film actually seems like the type of western that Kubrick would have made. In my opinion, that’s the greatest compliment a director can receive for his work.
Whether you love it or hate it, There Will Be Blood is a film you won’t easily forget.
- Movie Review: There Will Be Blood
- Published: February 06, 2008
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Drama, Review
- Writer: Zack Williams
- Zack Williams's BC Writer page
- Zack Williams's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
i understand all except...... what happened to Paul .....???
Are you asking what happened to Paul Dano, or his character...
Sorry, but I'm a little lost by your question. If you've seen the movie, you know exactly what happens to his character and why.
Or you asking what happened to Paul Thomas Anderson...?
i ask too: what happned to paul, or is he really a side of ilay?
Oh, Paul... the other Sunday.
He was smart, like Plainview said. He took his money and didn't go back to Little Boston. I don't think P.T. Anderson was trying to trick the audience or anything with Dano playing both actors. I read that someone else was supposed to play Paul Sunday, but Anderson didn't like this performance, or something of that nature


![There Will Be Blood [Theatrical Release] There Will Be Blood [Theatrical Release]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41pcpi5Z9FL._SY90_.jpg)






There will be blood, a plot-less, character driven mess that has no point or purpose except to expose the degredation of our society and humantiy. Three hours of pointless meanderings into the life of an "oil-man". What do we pull from this movie, a metaphor for the American greed machine, who will stop at nothing to get what he wants? Or maybe a psychopathic entrepreneur that has no idea of what life is really about? Or maybe the director is thumbing his nose at the American cinematic viewer, trying desperately to antagonize us into believing that we can have sympathy with a man with such merit because we all have a little bit of Daniel Plainview in us...my favorite part of the movie though is the end..."God is a superstition" Amen to that...a hefty Amen to that...can we all just realize that God is not real...and if he does exist, that he does not care about us!!!