REVIEW

Movie Review: Your Mommy Kills Animals

Written by Richard Marcus
Published February 03, 2008
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Whether we like them or not, they have had a certain amount of success in achieving their goal of making it increasingly difficult for companies to conduct business in the manner to which they were accustomed. In fact it's their very success which caused the implementation of the new act mentioned earlier in this review. Of the first seven individuals who were charged under that act, six have been found guilty and been sentenced to anything from one to six years in jail and ordered to pay one million dollar fines; are all interviewed in this film and don't seem any more dangerous than you or I.

None of them were charged with actually carrying out any acts of violence, and none of them have taken part in any activities described earlier. They were all charged because of information that was posted at a website encouraging people to take action against Huntington Life Sciences, in spite of the fact there is no proof linking them directly to the website's publication. As a person in the film who doesn't agree with their tactics said, though, the most troubling part of all this is the fact that they were charged for advocating activities that anti-abortion groups, anti-homosexual and AIDS organizations groups, and the Klu Klux Klan are allowed to advocate or carry out with impunity. America's cherished constitutional clause guaranteeing free speech seems to be very selective.

You may have noticed that I've not mentioned People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) in this review, and been wondering why a film about animal activism doesn't talk about them. First of all, PETA refused to be interviewed for the movie and so they weren't able to rebut any of the accusations leveled against them. It seems that people on both sides of the issue, form the animal rights camp to the animal welfare camp and the people who argue in favour of animal testing, can agree on at least one thing — an intense dislike of PETA.

While most people seem intent on preserving the lives of animals, or making their situation better, PETA has been steadily running up the highest euthanasia percentage among all animal rescue groups. In one year they put down 85% of the animals they took in from shelters instead of either housing them of finding them new homes. We're talking about healthy animals that would have lived years, but PETA decided that it's better to kill them than to keep them penned up. In general PETA is another organization that comes across as being more interested in their status and seeking celebrity endorsements then the welfare of animals.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Copy02-11-Richard portrait-72-4x4.jpgRichard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at Leap In The Dark and Epic India Magazine.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Your Mommy Kills Animals
Published: February 03, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Documentary, Politics: War and Terrorism, Culture: Society
Writer: Richard Marcus
Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
Richard Marcus's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Richard Marcus
Video: Documentary
Politics: War and Terrorism
Culture: Society
All Video Articles
Richard Marcus's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 4, 2008 @ 14:58PM — xurbanveganx [URL]

I've seen this film, and though it is very interesting look into the world of animal rights, it is actually very very biased film. the notorious lobby group CCF - Center for consumer freedom paid over 300 000$ to produce this film and make large groups (PETA and HSUS (not USHS)) look bad.

Not only does this betray the publics trust but loses journalistic credability

for more info check out

for the animals,

Lucas
Montreal, Canada

#2 — February 4, 2008 @ 16:03PM — Maddy

CCF sued the filmmaker specifically because he did *not* do a hatchet job on PETA/HSUS. If this film really had been a CCF-sponsored hit job, CCF would never have allowed their involvement to become public.

#3 — February 4, 2008 @ 16:55PM — Tracy

Animal rights is about realizing that all living beings deserve compassion. Also, there are MANY animal-rights supporters who care for dogs and cats. I, myself, foster dogs for a rescue organization.

I also help reduce animal suffering by being vegan (ie. not financially supporting companies that slaughter animals).

#4 — February 4, 2008 @ 23:07PM — etbmfa

7 Things You Didn't Know About PeTA

1. PeTA has stated repeatedly that their goal is "total animal liberation." This means no pets, no meat, no milk, no zoos, no circuses, no fishing, no hunting, no farming, no leather, and no animal testing for lifesaving medicines.
2. PeTA has given tens of thousands of dollars to convicted arsonists and other violent criminals.
3. PeTA funds the misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine an animal-rights organization that presents itself as an unbiased source for nutritional information and has links to violent animal-rights groups called SHAC and ALF.
4. PeTA has used their contributors tax-exempt donations to fund the North American Earth Liberation front and the Animal Liberation Front, FBI-certified domestic terrorist groups responsible for fire bombs and death threats.
5. PeTA regularly targets kids as early as elementary school with anti-meat and anti-milk propaganda. They are totally opposed to traditional farming methods.
6. PeTA spends less than one percent of its $13 million budget actually caring for animals. PeTA kills animals.
7. PeTA has repeatedly attacked groups like the March of Dimes, the Pediatric AIDS Foundation, and the American Cancer Society, for conducting animal testing to find cures for birth defects and life-threatening diseases.


#5 — February 5, 2008 @ 11:25AM — Tracy

About the Center for Consumer Freedom:

Guest Choice Network, the predecessor organization to CCF, was formed in such a way so as not to appear "owned" by Philip Morris, to address the lack of interest restaurant owners had in Philip Morris's "Accommodation Program," and to have a broader appeal to industry than just tobacco. GCN was designed to "create an aggressive mentality by [restaurant] operators [to oppose} government smoking bans," according to a letter by Rick Berman to Philip Morris [2073148834]

In a 1995 letter to Philip Morris (PM), Rick Berman (of the public affairs company Berman & Company) proposed that PM form an aggressive front group called the "Guest Choice" network to motivate restaurant owners to aggressively fight smoking restrictions while appearing to be acting on their own. Berman said to PM, "...if you want to gain more ground quickly for the smokers' rights issue, the [Guest Choice] program must create a proactive, aggressive mentality by [restaurant] operators regarding government smoking bans..." Berman described how hiding Philip Morris' involvement would allow the group take more aggressive action:

"Additional benefit -- if externally perceived as driven by restaurant interests, there will be more flexibility and creativity allowed than if it is 'owned' by Philip Morris. The American Beverage Institute, which opposes overly aggressive DWI laws, enjoys this profile."[1]

PM took Mr. Berman's suggestion and formed the "Guest Choice Network," changing its name in recent years to the "Center for Consumer Freedom," which in addition to fighting smoking bans also fights the organic food movement and lobbies against lowering the legal blood alcohol limit for drunk driving.

For more information

#6 — February 9, 2008 @ 11:46AM — Ariana [URL]

This film verges on bias personified. The only thing is, it's so cleverly hidden with a 'we don't take sides' feel.

Whether you're religious or an atheist, whether you believe in souls or whether you believe other animals have souls or not, one thing is clear. Man has no right for doing what he does to other animals. Look for any excuse you want, economically, compassionately or whatever, make a movie about it, the fact remains.

In over twenty four years of working with animals, I have never seen a kitten duct-tape a live human baby to a freeway. I also have never seen a cat find enjoyment from setting a human on fire. I've never gone hiking in the desert to find a child that dogs have left tied to a stake, without food and water, subjecting it to a painful death in the desert heat. I have never seen a chicken force two unwilling humans to fight in a ring with razor blades attached to their feet while the chickens place bets on who will be the first to die. I haven't seen a puppy place eight children in a gunnysack and drown them in a river.

Neither have I seen an eagle aim a shotgun at an unarmed human. I have yet to see a bear kill a human simply to place a head on the wall of their cave. And to this day, I have not seen a pigeon drive a car down the road and aim for humans who were walking around the park.

Let me tell you what I have seen. I have seen my own cats sleep next to me so they may keep me a little warmer when I was ill or upset by something. I've seen my dogs play games with me just to force a smile to my face. I have seen a cat rush into a burning home not once, not twice, but six times to save her kittens, nearly losing her own life in the process. I have seen a ferret pull a frightened kitten out of a deep hole in the ground. I have seen a coyote fetch another dog so that it may get the proper medical care that it needs.

I've seen a dog, who loves to jump on people, avoid jumping on me when I was injured and using a cane for stability. I've seen elephants cry. I've seen monkeys scream in empathy when one of their own were injured. I've seen puppies whine all night long when they were separated from their mothers. I've seen a dog pull a child away from a fire. I have seen a mother cat place a child's sock to her teat when her family is torn from her prematurely.

And I can look at the faces of those I care for in my home and know they are spiritually no different than I am, only lacking protection from those who seek justification for killing them.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/73514)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments