Movie Review: Your Mommy Kills Animals
Published February 03, 2008
Ever since Greenpeace started photographing pictures of baby seals being clubbed to death during the annual seal hunt in Newfoundland Canada and putting themselves between whalers' harpoons and their prey, the issue of humanity's relationship with the creatures we share the planet with has become an increasingly hot topic. The fur industry, cosmetic industry, soap companies, food industry, whaling industry, and companies that use animals in any sort of laboratory testing have all been subject to intense scrutiny, and forced to change their practices due to the activities of groups like Greenpeace and Sea Shepherds.
It wasn't that long ago when it was considered perfectly acceptable for a company to do whatever it wanted to animals when it came to testing if their latest shampoos would make your eyes water. Now of course no one would dream of putting out a shampoo or skin care product which didn't contain the magic words "NO ANIMAL TESTING" or variations on that theme or risk the ire of animal activists. Huntington Life Services found out what that mean as the campaign against them was so successful that it resulted in various corporations across the United States severing ties with it, and the company being forbidden from trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
Like any other emotionally charged issue where people tend to check their brains at the door and have knee-jerk responses on both sides of the argument, finding anything approaching a fair and balanced look at the issue has been next to impossible. It hasn't helped matters that the government of the United States has rushed to protect the people that guarantee their elections each year by passing the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act in 2006 making activities affecting the profit-making ability of a business conducting animal testing an act of terrorism under the Patriot Act. Heavy-handed reactions like that aren't liable to create conditions conducive to calm and rational debates.
So I was delighted to find that the documentary feature film Your Mommy Kills Animals, just released on DVD, made a concentrated effort to be as unbiased and even-handed as possible. While it's obvious the makers have sympathy for the work done by certain organizations in regards to animal welfare, and they regard the prosecution of individuals charged and sentenced under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act as unconstitutional, they do their best to merely observe and report.
- Movie Review: Your Mommy Kills Animals
- Published: February 03, 2008
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Documentary, Politics: War and Terrorism, Culture: Society
- Writer: Richard Marcus
- Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
- Richard Marcus's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
CCF sued the filmmaker specifically because he did *not* do a hatchet job on PETA/HSUS. If this film really had been a CCF-sponsored hit job, CCF would never have allowed their involvement to become public.
Animal rights is about realizing that all living beings deserve compassion. Also, there are MANY animal-rights supporters who care for dogs and cats. I, myself, foster dogs for a rescue organization.
I also help reduce animal suffering by being vegan (ie. not financially supporting companies that slaughter animals).
7 Things You Didn't Know About PeTA
1. PeTA has stated repeatedly that their goal is "total animal liberation." This means no pets, no meat, no milk, no zoos, no circuses, no fishing, no hunting, no farming, no leather, and no animal testing for lifesaving medicines.
2. PeTA has given tens of thousands of dollars to convicted arsonists and other violent criminals.
3. PeTA funds the misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine an animal-rights organization that presents itself as an unbiased source for nutritional information and has links to violent animal-rights groups called SHAC and ALF.
4. PeTA has used their contributors tax-exempt donations to fund the North American Earth Liberation front and the Animal Liberation Front, FBI-certified domestic terrorist groups responsible for fire bombs and death threats.
5. PeTA regularly targets kids as early as elementary school with anti-meat and anti-milk propaganda. They are totally opposed to traditional farming methods.
6. PeTA spends less than one percent of its $13 million budget actually caring for animals. PeTA kills animals.
7. PeTA has repeatedly attacked groups like the March of Dimes, the Pediatric AIDS Foundation, and the American Cancer Society, for conducting animal testing to find cures for birth defects and life-threatening diseases.
About the Center for Consumer Freedom:
Guest Choice Network, the predecessor organization to CCF, was formed in such a way so as not to appear "owned" by Philip Morris, to address the lack of interest restaurant owners had in Philip Morris's "Accommodation Program," and to have a broader appeal to industry than just tobacco. GCN was designed to "create an aggressive mentality by [restaurant] operators [to oppose} government smoking bans," according to a letter by Rick Berman to Philip Morris [2073148834]
In a 1995 letter to Philip Morris (PM), Rick Berman (of the public affairs company Berman & Company) proposed that PM form an aggressive front group called the "Guest Choice" network to motivate restaurant owners to aggressively fight smoking restrictions while appearing to be acting on their own. Berman said to PM, "...if you want to gain more ground quickly for the smokers' rights issue, the [Guest Choice] program must create a proactive, aggressive mentality by [restaurant] operators regarding government smoking bans..." Berman described how hiding Philip Morris' involvement would allow the group take more aggressive action:
"Additional benefit -- if externally perceived as driven by restaurant interests, there will be more flexibility and creativity allowed than if it is 'owned' by Philip Morris. The American Beverage Institute, which opposes overly aggressive DWI laws, enjoys this profile."[1]
PM took Mr. Berman's suggestion and formed the "Guest Choice Network," changing its name in recent years to the "Center for Consumer Freedom," which in addition to fighting smoking bans also fights the organic food movement and lobbies against lowering the legal blood alcohol limit for drunk driving.
For more information
This film verges on bias personified. The only thing is, it's so cleverly hidden with a 'we don't take sides' feel.
Whether you're religious or an atheist, whether you believe in souls or whether you believe other animals have souls or not, one thing is clear. Man has no right for doing what he does to other animals. Look for any excuse you want, economically, compassionately or whatever, make a movie about it, the fact remains.
In over twenty four years of working with animals, I have never seen a kitten duct-tape a live human baby to a freeway. I also have never seen a cat find enjoyment from setting a human on fire. I've never gone hiking in the desert to find a child that dogs have left tied to a stake, without food and water, subjecting it to a painful death in the desert heat. I have never seen a chicken force two unwilling humans to fight in a ring with razor blades attached to their feet while the chickens place bets on who will be the first to die. I haven't seen a puppy place eight children in a gunnysack and drown them in a river.
Neither have I seen an eagle aim a shotgun at an unarmed human. I have yet to see a bear kill a human simply to place a head on the wall of their cave. And to this day, I have not seen a pigeon drive a car down the road and aim for humans who were walking around the park.
Let me tell you what I have seen. I have seen my own cats sleep next to me so they may keep me a little warmer when I was ill or upset by something. I've seen my dogs play games with me just to force a smile to my face. I have seen a cat rush into a burning home not once, not twice, but six times to save her kittens, nearly losing her own life in the process. I have seen a ferret pull a frightened kitten out of a deep hole in the ground. I have seen a coyote fetch another dog so that it may get the proper medical care that it needs.
I've seen a dog, who loves to jump on people, avoid jumping on me when I was injured and using a cane for stability. I've seen elephants cry. I've seen monkeys scream in empathy when one of their own were injured. I've seen puppies whine all night long when they were separated from their mothers. I've seen a dog pull a child away from a fire. I have seen a mother cat place a child's sock to her teat when her family is torn from her prematurely.
And I can look at the faces of those I care for in my home and know they are spiritually no different than I am, only lacking protection from those who seek justification for killing them.


Richard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at 








I've seen this film, and though it is very interesting look into the world of animal rights, it is actually very very biased film. the notorious lobby group CCF - Center for consumer freedom paid over 300 000$ to produce this film and make large groups (PETA and HSUS (not USHS)) look bad.
Not only does this betray the publics trust but loses journalistic credability
for more info check out
for the animals,
Lucas
Montreal, Canada