OPINION

A Hillary-Bill Ticket? Make It Happen

Written by Matthew T. Sussman
Published January 27, 2008

We all knew, once Bill Clinton left presidency in 2000, that at some point his legally-binding life partner Hillary would run for president, prompting Bill to perhaps become the country's first ever First Dude. But it was too much to speculate about who her potential vice president would be — veeps are practically figureheads anyway — although at this point in history it's probably going to be some pretty boy like John Edwards.

An odd idea struck me this week, and the idea resonated stronger as Bill campaigned for Hillary in South Carolina, just as he did in Nevada.

Assuming she nabs the Democratic nomination (Who knows if it'll happen, but let's pretend. Otherwise this column pretty much sucks.), how about Bill Clinton as Hillary Clinton's running mate? Why the hell not? It may not make any sense. In fact, it makes probably so little sense, that it makes too much sense. Did I just blow your mind? Good, now you agree with me.

Anybody suffering from political apathy would be cured with a Clinton-Clinton campaign. People alienated from politics would finally pay attention again. Forget their platforms. A married couple as president and vice president. The First Couple.

Before anybody gets ridiculously excited about the possibility of this, we have to find out if this is in fact constitutionally legal. About two years ago the Washington Post's Peter Baker delved into this very subject, and there are two schools of thought. While the 22nd Amendment limits a U.S. president to two elected terms, it also puts the cap at 10 years, meaning you can squeeze two contingency years in there somewhere. But another clause says if you're ineligible to be President, you cannot be elected vice president. He isn't eligible to be elected, but he can still serve two years.

page 1 | 2
Matt SussmanMatt Sussman is the former sports editor of BC Magazine and also writes for Deadspin, SPORTSbyBROOKS, The Futon Report, and the Toledo Free Press. Catch him with Tuffy on Treehouse Fort, the official show of BC Sports.

Feed the feedback back to matt.sussman@blogcritics.org.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
A Hillary-Bill Ticket? Make It Happen
Published: January 27, 2008
Type: Opinion
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Humor and Satire, Politics: Elections and Candidates
Part of a feature: On The Road To 2008
Writer: Matthew T. Sussman
Matthew T. Sussman's BC Writer page
Matthew T. Sussman's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Matthew T. Sussman
Culture: Humor and Satire
Politics: Elections and Candidates
All Politics Articles
Matthew T. Sussman's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 27, 2008 @ 16:39PM — Dr Dreadful [URL]

This should probably be filed as satire. I'm pretty sure we're not supposed to be taking you seriously, but...

Anyway, Bill has pretty much categorically ruled himself out. Apart from anything else, the mere floating of the idea would inevitably spark a Supreme Court ruckus that would fatally impact the Clinton campaign.

Love that photo though. Where did you dig it up?

#2 — January 27, 2008 @ 17:34PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

It was taken last March. I've seen it before, and I was hoping to find the Reuters version from a slightly different perspective where he's actually between the legs. Here's the thumbnail, but I can't find the hi-rez.

#3 — January 27, 2008 @ 19:08PM — peace

I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your opinion regarding the Clinton-Clinton '08 ticket. Bill Clinton's image was tarnished by the Lewinsky's scandal during his presidency (which should never had happened), thus affected the husband-and-wife relationship between Hillary and himself.
Would that given him or her a good impression as a good Evangelical Christian as well as competent President of the United States?
Even if they successfully become Americas next president. Can they solve all of America's past and current problems? I don't think so. I have some Christian friends of mine
who felt shame to be a Christian because of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush evil deeds.
I think its utter ridiculous that the Clintons can resolve their differences so quickly, just for their own benefit and cause. Give peace a chance, please elect the right and smart US president this time.

#4 — January 28, 2008 @ 13:40PM — Baronius

Excellent article and photo.

#5 — January 29, 2008 @ 19:48PM — Herb

If they get a divorce, Hillary would do it 9 years ago. Is Bill hurting Hillary's campaign? I do not think so. Once Bill made a speech "all the black vote for Obama, all the women vote for Hillary!" , I think that really helps for Hillary's campaign. Hillary, I think I grant that eight years of being a very politically involved First Lady do count for something in terms of experience. I think this book "For Love of Politics: Bill and Hillary Clinton" tells everything.

#6 — January 29, 2008 @ 22:27PM — Cap

The photo was brilliant.

As for the concept of Clinton-Clinton in '08. I would cry a moment, and then head for Canada.

I hope that that combo could never become a reality.

#7 — February 5, 2008 @ 02:28AM — gervase

Bill Clinton:
"But I wanna say one thing to the American people: I want you to listen to me. I'm gonna say this again. I did NOT have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie. Not a single time, never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people."

yeah right!! oh come on...Bill

Why did you say that to the American people Bill Clinton? Why did you lie to your wife Hillary?
Why did you scold us for your philandering and why did you lie to us at the same time you were scolding us angrily.

#8 — February 7, 2008 @ 18:54PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

You're all over the map here Gervase, just come right out and say it.

#9 — February 7, 2008 @ 18:59PM — Christopher Rose [URL]

peace/gervase: please confine yourself to just one name when commenting here or I shall be annoyed.

Blogcritics Comments Editor

#10 — February 7, 2008 @ 19:05PM — gervase

I'm sorry I was frustrated.

#11 — February 7, 2008 @ 19:21PM — Christopher Rose [URL]

Please don't post your personal contact details either. Maybe you should take a moment to read the Blogcritics Comments Policy...

#12 — February 7, 2008 @ 19:50PM — gervase

i made a mistake, sorry about that. pls disregard my comments about Hillary. Apologies for any troubles caused

#13 — February 7, 2008 @ 19:56PM — Christopher Rose [URL]

No problem, you can make any comment you like within reason, just stick to one ID and don't post personal info, that's all.

#14 — February 7, 2008 @ 20:29PM — gervase

ok, you have my word and assurance, thanks for your understanding. I really appreciate it.

#15 — February 9, 2008 @ 17:22PM — CATE

OK I HAVE TO SAY i do not think of bill clintons presidence as tarnished because of the lewinsky thing... to me it tarnished the republican party more in the long run.. they chose to go after the man and wast billionsof tax dollars to do so so that the next pres and 8 yrs look where we are ? the oath of office does not say that a president is above being human and that they give up all their private lives .. that should have remained private .. I would rather see those dollars that were used to try to impeach bill .. to look into our current administration .. and his people and how there are many issues about the reasons for war.. putting our troops in harms wayfor one reason but when really it was something else oops..sorry .. bill getting a bj.. whether hillary and him were able to move beyond that is not our business..but it is our contries biz about the economy, the war and our safety ..

I would think Bill back in the office of VP would be great.. he is a brilliant man.. and they clearly make a great "team".. if not bill sure id love to see Edwards.. another great man with his heart definately focused on not making $$ and he really wants to make a difference...
think people..... we voted on emotion for the last two and see where we are.. time to wake up and get smart!!! the welfare of our country is at stake..... to me alot more important than a bj!

#16 — February 9, 2008 @ 18:05PM — Ruvy in Jerusalem [URL]

Bill Clinton's not president anymore? Boy, I feel like I've just gotten up from a long sleep and nothing has changed. If he's not president anymore, why is his wife running around like a professional madame pimping out her little girl?

#17 — February 9, 2008 @ 18:34PM — Victor Lana [URL]

I got a new name for Bill (thanks to that photo you included, Matt): King Leer! Long live the king! It would actually be a riot if they ran together and won. Maybe Roslyn Carter can be next. Yippee!!

#18 — February 9, 2008 @ 19:13PM — Dr Dreadful [URL]

why is his wife running around like a professional madame pimping out her little girl?

And Chelsea Clinton shouldn't be supporting her own mother's presidential campaign because...?

#19 — February 9, 2008 @ 19:52PM — Clavos

"And Chelsea Clinton shouldn't be supporting her own mother's presidential campaign because...?"

Because she's a Libertarian and is voting for Ron Paul?

Or....She's a Bilderberger and has orders to derail her mom's campaign...oh no, wait...that's Bill's role -- remember, he was a Rhodes Scholar, Doc!

#20 — February 11, 2008 @ 06:27AM — gervase

How about Hillary Clinton as President with Obama/Edwards/Al Gore as her running mate? What do you think?

#21 — February 21, 2008 @ 18:50PM — gervase

The stubborn Americans and Republicans Hawkish Bush did it again by repeating the history of blatant interference into other countries affairs. what can I say the Americans are very ignorant people by unilaterally supporting Kosovo province being the independent country without consulting Serbia and Russia first. This, in my opinion, is totally illegal and extreme disrespect towards Serbia.
it sets a dangerous precedent in this world
and threat to world peace..(Don't they read and learn their history lessons..Do Americans have a foreign policy? I don't think so..)
It also touched the sensitive nerve of other countries who longed to breakaway from their motherland -- As Kosovo unilateral declaration of independence is considered illegal.. and caused a split in the UN (thanks to America :()
No wonder America are most hated than other countries. No wonder Americans are most hated so much because of their extreme ignorance, arrogance and ineptitude towards other countries history and feelings.
I will not recognize Kosovo being an independent country as Kosovo is part of Serbia and province territory of Serbia (Serbian soverignty) it is part of Serbian historic identity,
and will ALWAYS FOREVER be Serbia and Serbian (period)

#22 — February 22, 2008 @ 00:34AM — gervase

My apologies for such controversial comments if it offended you I guess I was naive, Apologies for any troubles caused Please delete it..thanks

[No trouble, Gervase, and your comment will stay.

Blogcritics is an open forum and you can express any views you choose, even if they might offend some readers. We'll delete personal attacks and comments which are pointlessly idiotic - yours was neither.

I hope you're enjoying the site and will continue to comment.

Thanks,
Assistant Comments Editor]

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/73297)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments