REVIEW

Movie Review: A Scary, Breathtaking Walk Through Cloverfield

Written by Vichus Smith
Published January 19, 2008

I have been waiting for something to scare me for a long time. Until I saw Cloverfield, the last movie that I expected to frighten me was Hostel. It kind of failed. I actually thought of it more as a really dark comedy. With all the American cut n’ paste movies taken from Japan and all the Saw films, I have not really been sucked in by most of these viewing experiences.

There was a bit of good buzz on Cloverfield before it opened. I was all over Rotten Tomatoes because I needed a good reason to go through a movie theater experience. For me to go to a theater these days, the movie has to be damn good. So I took a chance and I saw Cloverfield. I am so glad I took a chance and did not wait for DVD.

Cloverfield takes place roughly within a day, and it is shot from the perspective of a camcorder. Are you still with me? I don’t know if you are, because this is - wait for the obvious reference - Blair Witch-style shaky cam. Director Matt Reeves’ idea was to put the audience inside this film as a character. It’s sort of like a first person shooter video game, like Half-life. You don’t get to see anything unless the guy holding the camera decides to focus on it.

Things go boom, then the wacky hijins begin! :)Our cameraman for this experience is named Hudson (T.J. Miller), or Hud for short. Hud is a total meathead. When you first meet Hud, he says something stupid, and until the end of the movie, he’s either saying something stupid, inappropriate, funny, or a mix of all three. He’s your comic relief, and he gets off some good lines. I guess they pick this dumb-but-loveable guy as the cameraman because he doesn’t entirely know when his behavior is appropriate. You need that type of person to be shooting some of the horrific happenings of this night, because anyone else might have abandoned the camera after the initial explosions.


The rest of the survivors include Marlena (Lizzy Caplan), the apple of Hud’s eye; Lily (Jessica Lucas) and Jason (Mike Vogel), a couple who planned the surprise party; and finally Rob Hawkins (Michael David-Stahl), who is leaving New York for Japan to be a vice president at an unnamed company.

page 1 | 2 | 3

"Vichus Smith" (K.L. Jr) also reviews movies and anime on Epinions.com and video games at GameInfoWire
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: A Scary, Breathtaking Walk Through Cloverfield
Published: January 19, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Horror, Video: Action
Writer: Vichus Smith
Vichus Smith's BC Writer page
Vichus Smith's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Vichus Smith
Video: Horror
Video: Action
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 19, 2008 @ 12:20PM — qer

hmmm....not yet seen the movie, but from reviews and reader comments it appears to have an over 90% rating which is simply amazing for such an unbelievable nonsense as a outsize monster rampaging through a city !!! and that too with countless godzilla, king-kong type movies already becoming history, seems the movie producers have pulled off the impossible...glurk !

guess its worth seeing.......off to the ticket booking counter !

#2 — January 19, 2008 @ 12:39PM — HF [URL]

A NOT scary nauseating walk through Cloverfield..

My ex-mother-in-law is scarier than the monster and I get her for free. I got dizzy while watching this movie because the camera is so blury and jumpy. Blair Witch used this style, but at least that movie had a story. The character who was filming the home movie was annoying. I know that kid. I have kicked him out of my house and now he's in a movie. Nice...You don't really get to see the monster clearly, only at the end and just for a second. It looked like a muppet.

#3 — January 19, 2008 @ 16:16PM — V. Smith [URL]

You're welcome to your opinon on how scary the monster is; What I found scary about the mosnter was how destructive it was more than it's look.

However, there was never any promise that there would be a full on look at the monster. You do get to see views of the monster, but never a full view of the monster from front to back. I still can't piece together how it looks. Since the movie, I have seen art of the monster, and I would have thought it would have looked more octopus-like.

Oh, and BTW, this has more of a story than the Blair Witch Project. I will stand up to that statement as a fact. There's a lot of backstory on who the characters are in Cloverfield. We know Rob is a VP for a big company with offices in Japan. We know that Hudson is his friend and Jason is Rob's brother. We know that Rob and Beth have a certain type of
relationship. We know a lot of details about them. Further along in the story, when characters meet other people, they learn a little more about the monster and its offspring. What's missing is the history of the monster and how it was created, which you aren't supposed to know anyway.

I'm not a big fan of when people say a movie has "no plot." I have watched movies (usually extremely low budget ones) that literally have no plot.

Also, don't tell me you didn't laugh at the thing Hud said about a homeless guy while they were in the tunnels. That had me laughing hard!

#4 — January 20, 2008 @ 22:26PM — kiki23

I thought that this movie was great. It had me interested through the whole movie, not like the Blair Witch. I liked how Cloverfield made me feel like I was watching a news breif on what was happening in NYC. It was all over just a great movie!

#5 — January 23, 2008 @ 13:36PM — joe

My theory is that watching this movie is much like looking at a 3D movie or a 3D image on paper. It's like when you draw a cube on a paper... some people see a cube when they look at it, but a small percenetage of the people only se a bunch of lines... thats probably because their brains are still very primitive or they lack something that allows the rest of us to grasp abstract concepts and ideas. To make a long story short, if you get motion sicknes from watching something on TV or Theater then your'e a fucking idiot.

#6 — January 23, 2008 @ 13:43PM — V. Smith [URL]

Calm yourself :)

If you want to make a leap from motion sickness to stupidity, that's all you. a vast array of people, some who I know personally, some who I don't, complained of catching motion sickness from the camera flaying wildly. It's just, I don't know, something genetic. All I know is that I've never gotten physically sick from a wild camera.

#7 — January 23, 2008 @ 21:37PM — joe

I believe you may be correct and what you said is exactly what I meant. It most likely is something genetic. It's just saddening to hear that there's so many people that have the same reaction. It even made CNN.com. I personnaly thought it was a great movie, and at no point during the movie did I feel nausea or motion sickness. I wonder... if I were to draw something on a paper and let one of them look at it while I shake it all around, would they get sick then too? It's very sad to hear that so many people have no appreciation for the arts.

#8 — January 23, 2008 @ 22:06PM — joe
#9 — January 23, 2008 @ 22:13PM — V. Smith [URL]

Um, yeah. I don't know what agenda you're on about, or why you think that linking to wikipedia makes any sense, but OK.

For some reason you hate people for having a reaction they are not completely in control of.

If you want to continue this conversation you can come here.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/73051)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments