NEWS

Human Growth Hormone Hysteria

Written by Sal Marinello
Published January 17, 2008

As this story has evolved and those who are charged with covering it continue to struggle with the issue, baseball pundits, journalists, fans and just about everyone else is shouting out their opinions. And in the aftermath of Tuesday’s Congressional Hearings investigating the use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) in MLB, people from both sides of the issues are screaming out of turn in order to be seen and heard.

The vast majority of these folks are wrong. There are too many of these “types” to discuss and at the same time keep this item short, so I’ll start with the worst offenders.

There are know-nothing journalists like the guy from the Palm Beach Post who wrote a column titled, “Hearings not worth Hill of beans” (sic). If only this writer spent half as much time trying to understand the issue as he did thinking up this lame headline pun his readership would be better off.  And he'd be doing his job.

People like this writer shrug their shoulders and say “big deal.” People with this attitude are in large part responsible for the PED scandal. Journalists who didn't want to be bothered then, and don't want to be bothered now, with inconvenient tasks like critical thinking, intellectual honesty and the basic concept of “playing within the rules” should remain silent.

Any professional journalist aware of the testimony from Tuesday’s hearing that says the effort amounted to “a Hill of beans” is an embarrassment as they missed several huge moments. Here’s a recap for those who are too shallow, lazy or disinterested to pay attention.

A potential blockbuster featured Christopher Shays, a member of the United States House of Representatives, who proposed a change to federal labor law that would draw a distinction between testing for recreational drugs and drugs that are performance-enhancing, or “drugs for cheating.” According to legal experts this fundamental change in the labor laws of America is revolutionary and would remove the players’ union from any role in testing for PEDs. If Congress were to approve such a move, MLB would not have to bargain with the union for any change in the league’s drug-testing program.

This is a big deal and nobody should discount Capitol Hill’s willingness to get actively involved with any aspect of baseball’s attempts to clean house.

page 1 | 2
Sal Marinello is a National Strength and Conditioning Association Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist and Certified Personal Trainer, a U.S.A. Weightlifting Certified Coach, a full-time, private Professional Strength and Conditioning Coach, an assistant football coach and a Head Strength Coach for a suburban New Jersey High School. He writes a lot and has no free time.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Human Growth Hormone Hysteria
Published: January 17, 2008
Type: News
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Culture: Crime and Court, Politics: Government, Sports: Baseball
Writer: Sal Marinello
Sal Marinello's BC Writer page
Sal Marinello's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Sal Marinello
Culture: Crime and Court
Politics: Government
Sports: Baseball
All Sports Articles
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 17, 2008 @ 16:49PM — alessandro

I was wondering: what's your position of WADA involving itself in the matter?

#2 — January 17, 2008 @ 16:56PM — sal m

as the worldwide leader in the field i have no problem with WADA asserting their position and calling out MLB.

the urine test for HGH is a pipe dream and to spend money on research for it is a waste. and while there may be issues with freezing blood, this is an effort worth researching so that it becomes a more viable option.

join me on my internet radio show to discuss this and related issues.

#3 — January 17, 2008 @ 19:14PM — alessandro

The President of WADA described it as a "serious threat to public health"

Is it?

I kinda have a problem with WADA - a public organization (connected to the IOC) - chastising private enterprises. It's ok to lean on them but call me a cynic (which I'm not) about their attempts to make a buck here.

But hey, Mitchell (as you point out) and Dick Pound are by all measures honorable men.

#4 — January 17, 2008 @ 20:03PM — sal m

when you consider that hgh messes with the endocriine system, allowed to go unchecked hgh use could cause problems for people who abuse it. and there hasn't been enough research for people to just run out and start using it for anti-aging and performance. when you realize that people may be buying it from who-knows where with no way to know if what they are getting is the real thing and/or safe to take i can see why WADA and other authorities are concerned.

i think people have to take a little step back in the light of this and realize that as an organization that has the task of policing the world of doping, they can be excused for engaging in a little hyperbole.

that being said, when you look at the clinical trials that have been completed or are being done right now, hgh has been/is being studied for a wide range of uses, so there's enough of a comfort level with the regulators to allow this drug to looked at as a treatment for the masses.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/72996)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments