REVIEW

Movie Review: In the Name of the King - A Dungeon Siege Tale

Written by Chris Beaumont
Published January 14, 2008
page 1 | 2

Next up are the sets, which look like the forest next to your house. Then there is the script, which has the actors delivering some of the worst lines to grace the screen since, well, last week's One Missed Call, but you get the idea. The performances are all laughable, making you wonder how Boll manages to attract the talent that he does. Finally, there are the numerous action scenes that cannot be distinguished one from the other.

At just north of two hours, In the Name of the King is a good 20-30 minutes too long. This is no Lord of the Rings and Uwe Boll is no Peter Jackson. The action scenes drag on and on and become dreadfully dull. The choreographed skirmishes don't offer anything of real interest, are bereft of blood (to avoid an R rating), and many of the blows don't land convincingly.

The performances are a mix of genuine earnestness and over-the-top hamminess. Jason Statham leads the cast and comes out of the experience relatively unscathed. He has the bad-ass persona down to a T. He does not really have a lot to do here, but he comes out okay. On the other hand, Burt Reynolds and Matthew Lillard are completely miscast; these two have no place in a fantasy movie, and it shows. The two are over the top in their performances and just feel off. As for the women in the film, Claire Forlani, Leelee Sobieski, and Kristanna Loken, they are given little to nothing to do other than look pretty, which they succeed at. I would be remiss if I did not mention Ray Liotta who seemed to know he wasn't supposed to be there and chose to take his performance as far as he could go with it.

Uwe Boll has been accused of being the worst director currently working. I don't feel that is completely accurate, but he sure doesn't shy away from controversy and seems to welcome being a target for derision. He has also been compared to Ed Wood in terms of his bad filmmaking, and that works on one level, but I have to believe that while Ed Wood was so in love with the art of movie making, Uwe has to be at least somewhat aware of the quality of the poor films he is helming.

Bottom line. This is not a good movie, but given the right friends and the right circumstances this can provide some fun. Still, this is not a good movie and I really doubt that Boll has a good movie in him.

Not Recommended.

page 1 | 2
Christopher Beaumont spends much of his time writing about entertainment when he isn't sitting in a movie theater. He is known around the office as the "Movie Guy" and is always ready to talk about his favorite form of entertainment and offer up recommendations. Interests include science fiction, horror, and metal music. His writings can be found at Draven99's Musings and Draven99's Media Center.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: In the Name of the King - A Dungeon Siege Tale
Published: January 14, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Adventure, Video: Fantasy
Writer: Chris Beaumont
Chris Beaumont's BC Writer page
Chris Beaumont's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Chris Beaumont
Video: Action
Video: Adventure
Video: Fantasy
All Video Articles
Chris Beaumont's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 14, 2008 @ 23:51PM — NancyGail [URL]

Considering Matthew Lillard played Shaggy in the Scooby Doo movies, this movie probably should be thought of as mediocre.

#2 — January 15, 2008 @ 06:49AM — Chris Beaumont [URL]

Lillard's skills are limited, but given the right role he is fine. I thought he made a great Shaggy, he was also fine in Scream and Wicker park. His, ahem, acting style is not suited to fantasy. But then, I don't Boll's are either.....

#3 — January 16, 2008 @ 20:19PM — Wes

Yeah, Lillard is ok otherwise, he (or the direction) just doesn't work in this film. I can handle Burt Reynolds, but, you nailed it about Liotta -- he seems to know he's not supposed to be there. And they dress him in a leather jacket!? I kept waiting for him to pull a 9mm instead of casting a spell. I caught the Ron Perlman Highlander episode soon after this. Pretty rough when a 60-million-dollar movie isn't even in the ballpark of a low-budget TV show.

#4 — February 11, 2008 @ 10:37AM — David Grant

Matthew Lillard should have never been chosen for the part he was cast in, i thought he was awful. The score was attrocious aswell it had me wanting to tear my eyes out and what the hell happened to the intro for the love of god most boring into to a fantasy ever

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/72894)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments