REVIEW

Movie Review: In the Name of the King - A Dungeon Siege Tale

Written by Chris Beaumont
Published January 14, 2008

The infamous Uwe Boll has struck again. He has unleashed his latest creation. Let me begin by saying that if you have a love for all things that are good about the movies, do not see In the Name of the King. However, if you derive perverse pleasure from bad films, or cannot help yourself when it comes to a Boll film, or if you just happen to like Mystery Science Theater 3000, by all means, go and spend your hard earned money on this bloated "epic." As I sat in the theater, I could not help but shake my head and roll my eyes (even if it was only for my personal benefit) as the nonsensical story played out in front of me.

The story is Lord of the Rings boiled down with the fat separated out. The problem is that rather than take the good stock, Uwe Boll scraped off the layer of fat, added some of his own lard and dropped it in the deep fryer with a healthy dose of cheese. If you couldn't tell, this is not exactly going to help you with your cholesterol level.

Farmer (Jason Statham) is - you guessed it - a farmer who lives in a remote part of the Kingdom of Ehb. He lives a quiet, simple life working the land and taking care of his wife, Solana (Claire Forlani) and his son Zeph. Meanwhile, the wizard Gaillan (Ray Liotta) and the simple-minded Duke Fallow (Matthew Lillard) are plotting to overthrow King Konreid (Burt Reynolds). The lives of all these characters are about to cross and become inextricably linked as their fates become clear.

Their respective journeys begin as vicious orc-like creatures called Krug attack. During the attack Farmer's wife is kidnapped and his son killed. Well, enough is enough. Farmer and a pair of friends head off on a journey to get to the bottom of the Krug attack and find his wife. Back at the castle, Fallow and Gaillan plot their next move as the Krug continue their rampage.

Before long, everyone's paths cross and secrets are revealed. If you don't guess what comes up during these revelations, you haven't been paying close enough attention. Everything plays it in a predictable manner that you will see coming miles away, even through all of the allusions to better films. It is an absolutely mind-numbing experience. In order to survive the flick, be sure to have your sarcasm stretched out and ready to run.

When it comes to a reason for what makes this movie so bad, it is difficult to choose just one. Looking at the big picture, it is, and I hate to be repetitious, a cheap knock-off of Tolkien and his Lord of the Rings universe. Not a good way to start.

page 1 | 2
Christopher Beaumont spends much of his time writing about entertainment when he isn't sitting in a movie theater. He is known around the office as the "Movie Guy" and is always ready to talk about his favorite form of entertainment and offer up recommendations. Interests include science fiction, horror, and metal music. His writings can be found at Draven99's Musings and Draven99's Media Center.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: In the Name of the King - A Dungeon Siege Tale
Published: January 14, 2008
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Adventure, Video: Fantasy
Writer: Chris Beaumont
Chris Beaumont's BC Writer page
Chris Beaumont's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Chris Beaumont
Video: Action
Video: Adventure
Video: Fantasy
All Video Articles
Chris Beaumont's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 14, 2008 @ 23:51PM — NancyGail [URL]

Considering Matthew Lillard played Shaggy in the Scooby Doo movies, this movie probably should be thought of as mediocre.

#2 — January 15, 2008 @ 06:49AM — Chris Beaumont [URL]

Lillard's skills are limited, but given the right role he is fine. I thought he made a great Shaggy, he was also fine in Scream and Wicker park. His, ahem, acting style is not suited to fantasy. But then, I don't Boll's are either.....

#3 — January 16, 2008 @ 20:19PM — Wes

Yeah, Lillard is ok otherwise, he (or the direction) just doesn't work in this film. I can handle Burt Reynolds, but, you nailed it about Liotta -- he seems to know he's not supposed to be there. And they dress him in a leather jacket!? I kept waiting for him to pull a 9mm instead of casting a spell. I caught the Ron Perlman Highlander episode soon after this. Pretty rough when a 60-million-dollar movie isn't even in the ballpark of a low-budget TV show.

#4 — February 11, 2008 @ 10:37AM — David Grant

Matthew Lillard should have never been chosen for the part he was cast in, i thought he was awful. The score was attrocious aswell it had me wanting to tear my eyes out and what the hell happened to the intro for the love of god most boring into to a fantasy ever

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/72894)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments