Re:Collection - Rush Permanent Waves (Mobile Fidelity edition)
Published January 09, 2008
The discs sat in my collection, surpassed as favorites by the 1997 remasters, until a few years ago when I was trying to conserve space and moved them. And then kind of forgot about them. Oh, I saw them sitting up there, on top of my big CD racks, but I never grabbed them to listen to. I had already made up my mind - the remasters sounded great, why bother?
The dorky completist fan in me made me salivate over the thought of this new MoFi Permanent Waves. For whatever reason, those long-ignored gold discs on my shelf suddenly grabbed my interest again. In the days before my order arrived, I pulled those discs down and gave them a listen. Audio nirvana - all those years listening to the remasters that I thought superior was erased by the calming, soothing, beautiful mastering of the Mobile Fidelity issues. I couldn't believe my ears. I jumped back and forth between the remasters and the MoFi discs, and, in the case of Moving Pictures, the original, unremastered CD. Things were different, very different - everything sounded better, clearer, brighter, cleaner . . . the soundstage is wider and more relaxed. Most of all, they were a pure joy to listen to. There's that weird thing I like to call "room sound." Some people I talk to know what I'm talking about, others don't. The MoFi discs reveal the room in which the instruments were recorded - one can sense the walls and space around them, especially Neil Peart's drums, which practically sound alive.
Permanent Waveshas arrived (stamped with #00398 in gold lettering - sweet!) and has gone through the same process - A/B-ing with the 1997 remaster - and the conclusion is the same. The latest Mobile Fidelity offering will not, however, find itself forgotten like the other Rush MoFi releases did. Nor will the previous three - they have found a permanent home on my Ipod, ripped in Apple Lossless format for the highest sound quality possible on that iconic little box. And what aobut you? The right listener, the picky listener, especially the Rush fan audiophile, on the right equipment, is going to have a second Christmas.
- Re:Collection - Rush Permanent Waves (Mobile Fidelity edition)
- Published: January 09, 2008
- Type: Review
- Section: Music
- Filed Under: Music: Classic Rock and Oldies, Music: Hard Rock, Music: Progressive Rock, Music: Rock
- Part of a feature: Re:Collection
- Writer: Tom Johnson
- Tom Johnson's BC Writer page
- Tom Johnson's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I'm not sure, Mark. It sounds pretty nice - a lot better than the remaster, at least. I haven't compared it to the original, but I will definitely do so and report back. It's blasphemy for me to say this, but 2112 is not a favorite of mine, so I really haven't spent a ton of time listening to it.
I will now prepare for the hate mail from the "real" Rush fans. Come on, people - when it comes to epic Rush, I'm all about Hemispheres and "Cygnus X-1 Book II."
The MoFi 2112 sounds WAY better than the original. There's a lot more detail revealed in their remastering. In fact, I'm amazed at how muddy the original pressing sounds compared to the MFSL disc. It's still, as you say, claustrophobic, but the revealed detail really opens it up.
It brings back memories of 1981....
Yes MOFI is back, and while they have cheaped out on the packaging, the firmware is as good as ever.
Drpth, no tinny, no BASS ID BEST modern mix, and even a bit of distinct stereo separatino clarity.
If you like lossless, still remember "virgin vinyl" and taking back 2 or 3 copies of that new LP to Wee Three till you found one that was free of pops and clicks, than you will appreciate this.
Bling Blingers in SUVS and Wrong Wheel Drive kiddies in rattling crapboxes,and those that think Youtube on your 16:9 is HDTV, need not bother.
Ah, memories are what makes life fun. :)
(embarrassed smiley here) Now I see why the "Please" in "Please preview your comments is in bold"...









does the 2112 mo-fi sound a lot better than the original? that was a very claustrophobic recording to begin with and then the first transfer to CD was pretty bad.
by the way, a friend of mine is a manufacturing engineer and worked on that lift-loc system, made by a company named Shape, from the state of maine.