<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Benazir Bhutto: In Life and Death, a Blessing to the Jihadists</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:41:19 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by temporal on Benazir Bhutto: In Life and Death, a Blessing to the Jihadists</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/07/010043.php#comment-685933</link>
<description>Benazir (Pinky) Bhutto was a lot of things but not a &lt;b&gt;jihadist&lt;/b&gt; as alamgir hussain would like us to believe in this post:

&lt;i&gt;These rabble-rousing statements speak volume of Benazir Bhutto&#039;s eager support for the Kashmiri separatists, clearly inspired by her Jihadi zeal.&lt;/i&gt;

*****

this is what i wrote recently on Benazir that describes her more accurately

&lt;b&gt;Benazir&#039;s Last Will Shows Her True Colors&lt;/b&gt;

In her death, she spoke like the feudal she was at heart, treating her party like her &lt;i&gt;jaagir&lt;/i&gt; (personal fiefdom.) She wrote the leadership of PPP should remain within the Bhutto clan.

While there are more eligible candidates in the Bhutto clan, she did not mean them, but her own son Bilawal Zardari, 19, who promptly and publicly consented to change his name to Bilawal Bhutto Zardari.

How can any party fight for democracy, and free and fair alphabet-soup of demands and display not one iota of conscience at this blatant travesty of democratic norms?

Today, greed won - injustice won - nepotism won- once again - and you, me and Pakistan lost.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685933@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:41:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Alamgir Hussain on Benazir Bhutto: In Life and Death, a Blessing to the Jihadists</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/07/010043.php#comment-685928</link>
<description>Dave,

What exactly is &quot;Islamic nationalism?&quot; How is it different from Jihad?

Muhammad founded the cult of Jihad for capturing the lands of the infidels and establish the supremacy of Islam that would eventually expand over the would world. Allah promises in the Quran to make Muslims the owner of the world and instigates them to fight until religion becomes Allah&#039;s [Islam] alone [2:193].

In the subcontinent, Jihad re-started in early 20th century leading to founding of Pakistan and Bangladesh. Next step in Jihad was to take away Kashmir. Then wait for another region to be dominated by Muslims... This has become the new strategy of the Jihadists in the changed world scenerio.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685928@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:31:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave Nalle on Benazir Bhutto: In Life and Death, a Blessing to the Jihadists</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/07/010043.php#comment-685755</link>
<description>There&#039;s a difference between Jihadism and Islamic nationalism.  Bhutto was more of a promoter of nationalism in Kashmir than Jihad, though she may have couched it in terms of holy war.  The desire to unite Pakistan, Kashmir and even Bangladesh into one Muslim nation of considerable size and power, able to stand up to India is a pretty strong seduction.  The fact that Bhutto embraced that nationalistic movement is by no means the same as supporting worldwide Jihad.

Dave</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685755@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:04:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>