INTERVIEW

The Metaphorical Medicine of House

Written by Diane Kristine
Published January 06, 2008
Part of House
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

She did give an example of a stand she took on a line in a script meant to imply sexual contact between two characters, a line that violated the precise terminology she holds dear about medicine. "I wrote them an e-mail and I said you can't have bacterial vaginosis in your mouth. First of all, it doesn't grow there. But more importantly, it wouldn't be called bacterial vaginosis if it were in your mouth."

"So they were like, 'That's very nice, but this is way funnier.' And you know, it was. What can I say? I fought the battle for linguistic purity and I lost to prurient humour and it was funny."

She says the House writers are so sophisticated now, with the show in its fourth season, they rarely unwittingly make errors. "There are some shows that probably adhere more closely to the way things are, but I think that's because their focus is on a different thing. House is really about figuring stuff out," she asserted. "It's true that House takes liberties with the truth – you know, bacterial vaginosis – but I think it's usually in an effort to do a show about thinking."

Dr. Scott Morrison, a physician in Illinois, writes reviews of House that focus more on the accuracy of the medicine than angst over the damaged doctor's dark soul or who flirted with whom – though he doesn't ignore those important areas, either. Far from an indignant list of nitpicks, his Polite Dissent reviews are written with obvious affection for the series. Perhaps surprisingly, he remains impressed with House's accuracy.

"House is probably the most accurate of the current crop of medical television shows, and definitely well above average for the genre," he said in an e-mail interview, in which he shared Sanders' opinion that entertainment does and should trump accuracy. "It’s simply not possible for them to be 100% accurate and remain a finely tuned drama. When I point out errors, especially the smaller ones, it is not so much to detract from House as it is to let my readers know what they should expect in real life."

In real life, as Morrison points out, "tests results often take days to come back and the results are rarely as clear cut as House or other television shows make them out to be."

Robert Sean Leonard as oncologist Dr. James WilsonIn real life, as Sanders points out, oncologists don't perform surgery. Plus, she said, "I have never touched the controls of an MRI. In fact, if I did, I would certainly be called before the CEO of Yale-New Haven Hospital: 'I understand you were touching our $6 billion MRI?'"

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Diane is a publications manager who's addicted to television, movies, and books and justifies her pop culture obsessions by writing about them for Blogcritics. She also runs the TV, Eh? website, a compilation of news and information about Canadian television series.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Metaphorical Medicine of House
Published: January 06, 2008
Type: Interview
Section: Video
Filed Under: Interviews, Video: Drama, Video: Television
Part of a feature: House
Writer: Diane Kristine
Diane Kristine's BC Writer page
Diane Kristine's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Diane Kristine
Interviews
Video: Drama
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Diane Kristine's personal weblog
All Interview articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 7, 2008 @ 09:49AM — Namaste

Thanks for the interviews, DK. It's good to get the point of view of the people who are medical professionals out there -- and who have nitpicked with the best -- and to know that they appreciate the difference between reality and entertainment as well. I do agree that it's sometimes a wide gulf, but I always say that if I want reality, I'll watch Discovery Health (and even reality is heavily edited).

#2 — January 7, 2008 @ 15:15PM — Diane Kristine

Hi Namaste, good to "see" you. I agree, and it's funny that we seem to expect more from a medical drama than a cop show or show set in an office, for example. There's not a lot of accuracy about any workplace you see on TV.

#3 — January 8, 2008 @ 22:16PM — Mary K. Williams [URL]

This was very, very good Diana. Glad you're keeping track of the good Dr. still.

#4 — January 9, 2008 @ 10:05AM — Phillip Winn [URL]

If work environments were realistically portrayed on television, what would be the point of watching? We could just go to work!

Real-life hospitals are fascinating at first, then dreadfully boring most of the time. A TV show has to remain interesting 17 hours a year for as many years as it can. I've watched 79 episodes of House and I'm still interested. I can't imagine still being fascinated after 55 hours of observing a real hospital.

#5 — January 15, 2008 @ 19:29PM — Karen Smith [URL]

Thank you Diane for a well written, very insightful look at the BEST show on television. Great job!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/72674)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments