INTERVIEW

The Metaphorical Medicine of House

Written by Diane Kristine
Published January 06, 2008
Part of House

He paces hospital corridors, juggles office implements, twirls his cane, fidgets with elastic bands, plays with that oversized ball, pops another Vicodin, interrogates his team, writes on his white board, sometimes even visits a patient. Dr. Gregory House brings the act of thinking to kinetic life each week, a remarkable achievement for a visual medium like television.

"I was very impressed with House from the beginning for what they were trying to do," said Dr. Lisa Sanders, a faculty member of the Yale School of Medicine and technical advisor for the series. "What they're really looking at is how doctors think, and it's not really a television-friendly topic."

Sanders, an Emmy-winning broadcast journalist before turning to medicine, has been part of the show since before it was a show. Her Diagnosis column in the New York Times inspired executive producer Paul Attanasio, who sold the show to Fox as a medical procedural before creator David Shore would turn it into equal parts character study.

When Attanasio told Sanders the show depended on this rude and obnoxious man people seemed to love, her first thought was "Good Lord, I'm not going to be employed for long."

Hugh Laurie as Dr. Gregory House"It would be a different show if Hugh [Laurie] were a different actor," she said. "I think he's really an incredible talent and it's because of him and because the writing is extraordinary that I was wrong."

Even a scientist isn't immune to the irrational charms of the show's leading man. "House is such a damaged character. He's such an unreliable narrator that his personal affectation of being a total schmuck is belied by the warmth and generosity in his face," she explained.

"You look at his face and he might be saying the meanest thing ever, and you know that inside there is a deeply caring person. Even if he's not caring about you as an individual, he cares about an idea that happens to be important to you too, which is figuring out what's going on. I think the genius of Hugh Laurie is that he's able to get that duality across."

Sanders, who provides the writers with the fact-based story ideas they crave and gives her expert opinion on the medicine in scripts, is pragmatic about her role with the show. "Sometimes if it's a choice between drama or comedy and complete accuracy, accuracy loses. I understand that. But I'm there to be the voice promoting accuracy, so I point it out and they either take it or not," she seemed to shrug. "It's hard to criticize their sense of drama and character."

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Diane is a publications manager who's addicted to television, movies, and books and justifies her pop culture obsessions by writing about them for Blogcritics. She also runs the TV, Eh? website, a compilation of news and information about Canadian television series.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Metaphorical Medicine of House
Published: January 06, 2008
Type: Interview
Section: Video
Filed Under: Interviews, Video: Drama, Video: Television
Part of a feature: House
Writer: Diane Kristine
Diane Kristine's BC Writer page
Diane Kristine's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Diane Kristine
Interviews
Video: Drama
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Diane Kristine's personal weblog
All Interview articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 7, 2008 @ 09:49AM — Namaste

Thanks for the interviews, DK. It's good to get the point of view of the people who are medical professionals out there -- and who have nitpicked with the best -- and to know that they appreciate the difference between reality and entertainment as well. I do agree that it's sometimes a wide gulf, but I always say that if I want reality, I'll watch Discovery Health (and even reality is heavily edited).

#2 — January 7, 2008 @ 15:15PM — Diane Kristine

Hi Namaste, good to "see" you. I agree, and it's funny that we seem to expect more from a medical drama than a cop show or show set in an office, for example. There's not a lot of accuracy about any workplace you see on TV.

#3 — January 8, 2008 @ 22:16PM — Mary K. Williams [URL]

This was very, very good Diana. Glad you're keeping track of the good Dr. still.

#4 — January 9, 2008 @ 10:05AM — Phillip Winn [URL]

If work environments were realistically portrayed on television, what would be the point of watching? We could just go to work!

Real-life hospitals are fascinating at first, then dreadfully boring most of the time. A TV show has to remain interesting 17 hours a year for as many years as it can. I've watched 79 episodes of House and I'm still interested. I can't imagine still being fascinated after 55 hours of observing a real hospital.

#5 — January 15, 2008 @ 19:29PM — Karen Smith [URL]

Thank you Diane for a well written, very insightful look at the BEST show on television. Great job!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/72674)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments