<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:48:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by karen on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-756806</link>
<description>BTW a &#039;healthy&#039; waist/hip ratio = &lt;0.8, but curvy &amp; ideal = 0.65-0.75 (and that is regardless of bust size).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">756806@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:48:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by karen on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-756805</link>
<description>PA Depland, not sure what you mean about pear shapes being &#039;unhealthy&#039; or &#039;undesirable&#039; but a pear does not have the same bust and waist measurement, it&#039;s more just a case there is less difference between waist and bust than waist and hips, for example 31-24-34 or 33-26-36....perfectly ideal and very natural for a healthy female.

Yes I&#039;m a pear and I have measurements 32-25-36...bigger on bottom than the top yes, but still a normal difference between my bust and waist and I&#039;m certainly healthy and my husband thinks I&#039;m desireable.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">756805@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:44:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by fed up on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-712063</link>
<description>can there be an article promoting healthy body image instead of bashing one body type over another. I do not believe that intelligence is based on body type.All men do not like the same type of women.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">712063@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:34:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vianka on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-712028</link>
<description>Just what we need - another stereotype for women. Now slim women are not as intelligent as chunky women? That is ridiculous! Does anybody get sick of hearing how women&#039;s bodies should look?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">712028@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:00:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Diana Hartman on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-685871</link>
<description>P A,
the article stands corrected (see article)...you are however, most incorrect about the .7 ratio...if you&#039;d like to discuss it further, take it up with &lt;a href=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/25/nwiggle125.xml&gt;cambridge mathematicians&lt;/a&gt;...

a woman is not unhealthy just because she is small-breasted...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685871@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:23:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matthew T. Sussman on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-685860</link>
<description>Next up: Blindness and the effects of curvy women on adolescent boys.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685860@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:45:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by P  A   DEPLAND on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-685858</link>
<description>Evidently the article was written by a thick waisted Twiggy type (opposite from hour-glass) and it went to her head. It would take a 2.8 inch
waist divided by 34 inch hips to come up with her ideal .08 ratio!  A healthy female figure, from a man&#039;s point of view, would be an hour-glass shaped (34-24-34)or(36-26-36), either, yielding an ideal .7 ratio.  On the other hand a .7 ratio begat from a pear shaped (24-24-34)or(26-26-36) would be classified as unhealthy and undesirable.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685858@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:38:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Diana Hartman on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-685844</link>
<description>imagine a world where the dairy farmers all got together and successfully marketed milk as the number one best beverage ever and that, by comparison, &quot;water is dry and listless&quot; or something equally ridiculous...

imagine images of milk plastered all over the place as a great thing - in movies, non-dairy ads, TV programs, you name it...because it wasn&#039;t good enough to tout their product, the dairy farmers have also gone on the rampage against water...imagine every image of water with a slanted, red line through it &amp;ndash; when it is seen, which is rare in this scenario, compared to images of milk...     

now imagine a health crisis among certain demographics wherein the health of a significant percentage of the population was severely compromised because they stopped drinking water based on their belief in the dairy commercials, and instead drank milk &amp;ndash; almost to the exclusion of any other beverage...

at that point it would well take a scientific study proving the value and worth of water to get the most avid milk-only drinkers to concede... 

if you think this couldn&#039;t happen, take a gander at the fashion industry whose stick-thin, shapeless models have given rise to weight-obsessed children as young as four, pathological weight obsession in grown women, and eating disorders...why? 

because they believe(d) the ads, the images, the words, and the frequency of the thin-is-in campaign...they believed it when told no man would want them and all women would scorn them if they couldn&#039;t fit into a size 2 dress...they ignored what little imagery there was/is of the healthier, curvy, hasn&#039;t-seen-size-10-since-she-was-16 woman &amp;ndash; because that&#039;s what they&#039;ve been told and told and told to do...  

now that science has confirmed what the not-weight-obsessed population has always known, maybe now we can start to fast track some of those who are weight-obsessed back onto the right track...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685844@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:58:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ruvy in Jerusalem on Study: Curvy Women Are More Intelligent and Make Smarter Children</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/01/06/135626.php#comment-685831</link>
<description>To think,

They had to do a study to figure out that a sexy girl with a cute figure was healthier and more attractive than a girl who didn&#039;t have a sexy figure.

Next up!  A study on why water is wet!! </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">685831@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:10:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>