<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:53:00 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Brad Laidman on Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/19/102402.php#comment-683629</link>
<description>I can actually rarely understand a word Imus says - I listen to Howard Stern and he&#039;s been saying that Imus was a racist for years so it appears at least slightly true - Stern actually fascinates me because he gets humor from retarded people and angry midgets which seems all king of wrong. You should be mocking the strong, but Stern is sort of empathetic in his retard mocking - as if he were &quot;there but for the grace of god go I&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">683629@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:53:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by V. Smith on Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/19/102402.php#comment-683608</link>
<description>A great example of defending unpopular freedom of expression. Yep, larry Clark&#039;s a creep. No doubt that he&#039;s not &quot;normal&quot; whatever that means. 

Still, Kids, I think, can still be a brutal wake-up call for teenagers who think that they&#039;re the first to be rebellious or sexually promiscuous. Unlike Ken Park, which didn&#039;t really have a message other than &quot;How can you get your movie banned in the US?&quot; Kids is one of his best works. If it makes you vomit, OK, but it&#039;s not like he&#039;s making kids do naughty things just for the hell of it in that movie.

Now, Brad, how do you feel about Don Imus?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">683608@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:57:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Colin  on Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/19/102402.php#comment-681409</link>
<description>The Fairy Tale is no-longer being censored, and there has been much debate over and attention on the cutting of the words Faggot and Slut from the lyrics... There&#039;s a good and lively debate at &lt;a href=&quot;www.guardian.co.uk&quot; &lt;a/&gt; The Guardian&#039;s  comment is free site. &lt;/a&gt; With gay rights activist Peter Tatchell (who&#039;s Britain&#039;s most famous of that ilk) arguing not in favour of the ban but for a consistent policy from the BEEB on &#039;hate words&#039;... I enjoyed your thoughtful piece Brad - isn&#039;t the eyeball slice in Chien Andalous (sic? probably) completely and deliberately gratuitous? I&#039;ve never seen a Clark film so I can&#039;t add much - I bought the soundtrack CD and that&#039;s pretty disturbing. 
In MOST Western societies there are limits and checks on freespeech but it&#039;s always a tricky line to draw.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">681409@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:03:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn on Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/19/102402.php#comment-681407</link>
<description>I passionately dislike the idea of censorship, but I&#039;ve seen plenty of things I wish didn&#039;t exist, and managed to avoid many more.

There&#039;s probably a line, possibly an ever-changing, but it&#039;s hard to define, so I&#039;d rather err on the side of no censorship at all combined with warning -- like this one -- so that people know when to steer clear.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">681407@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:59:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jon Sobel on Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/19/102402.php#comment-681387</link>
<description>I&#039;m with you.  Speaking of ridiculous censorship, did you hear about the BBC &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/18/faiytale_censorship/&quot;&gt;censoring&lt;/a&gt; Fairytale of New York?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">681387@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:07:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by El Bicho on Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/19/102402.php#comment-681381</link>
<description>So you think Clark is a sick man and the film has one of the worst scenes ever, yet you advertise the DVD on Amazon?  Kind of a mixed message, don&#039;t you think?

There are kids like the ones in &quot;Kids&quot; and that final scene was supposed to disturb and repulse you.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">681381@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:49:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>