Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History
Published December 19, 2007
The single issue I care most about politically is free speech and freedom of expression. This Film Is Not Yet Rated, which I have previously discussed on Blogcritics, is, I think, one of the most important films made in the past decade. Stores with huge market shares, like Wal-Mart, that decide what material is or is not suitable for their customers drive me insane. I was enraged when a bunch of Congressmen got together to show official displeasure with Ice-T’s “Cop Killer,” and believe me, if Steve Earle’s “F the FCC” comes up on my iPod shuffle, I’m turning it up. It even dismays me that obviously racist material like Amos and Andy and Song of the South have been suppressed from viewers who might want to see what the fuss is all about.
The modern era with its almost omnipresent pornography on the internet has made things tough for a guy like me. It’s not Lenny Bruce and Naked Lunch people are upset about these days, and who really wants to be the one at a dinner party arguing for the need to preserve 2 Live Crew?
Freedom of expression is paramount to me, but that doesn’t mean certain things I’m forced to defend don’t still skeeve me to the bone. Once on an el train in Chicago I overheard a child of less than ten singing along with a rap song he was listening to that was essentially a boast about an upcoming rape. It didn’t change my views, but that has to send shivers up your spine, especially since most censorship arguments are based on dangers to children.
One person who is obsessed with the state of our youth is Larry Clark. Larry Clark creeps me out more than any filmmaker or writer I’ve ever come across. Clark was an accomplished photographer when he made a big splash in the movies with his film Kids. Kids is scarier than any horror movie ever made. If I ever thought the characters depicted in Kids were representative of even 1% of the youth of America, I’d pray endlessly for Armageddon.
These “kids” make the amoral drugged-out youth of River’s Edge look like Harvard Business School graduates. Its final scene, where a drugged up, barely conscious, HIV positive Chloe Sevigny gets raped at a party by another teen is perhaps the single most disturbing and repulsive thing I’ve ever seen in a movie.
I’ve now seen three of Clark’s movies, and I’m completely convinced that he isn’t a voice out to warn us about the dangerous youth we’re spawning, but just a creepy guy who has a fetish for filming graphically sexual material featuring heroin-thin, barely pubescent teens - and I haven’t even seen Ken Park, which apparently makes the rest of his work look like Romper Room.
- Larry Clark and the Most Gratuitous Shot in Movie History
- Published: December 19, 2007
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Art House
- Writer: Brad Laidman
- Brad Laidman's BC Writer page
- Brad Laidman's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I'm with you. Speaking of ridiculous censorship, did you hear about the BBC censoring Fairytale of New York?
I passionately dislike the idea of censorship, but I've seen plenty of things I wish didn't exist, and managed to avoid many more.
There's probably a line, possibly an ever-changing, but it's hard to define, so I'd rather err on the side of no censorship at all combined with warning -- like this one -- so that people know when to steer clear.
The Fairy Tale is no-longer being censored, and there has been much debate over and attention on the cutting of the words Faggot and Slut from the lyrics... There's a good and lively debate at The Guardian's comment is free site. With gay rights activist Peter Tatchell (who's Britain's most famous of that ilk) arguing not in favour of the ban but for a consistent policy from the BEEB on 'hate words'... I enjoyed your thoughtful piece Brad - isn't the eyeball slice in Chien Andalous (sic? probably) completely and deliberately gratuitous? I've never seen a Clark film so I can't add much - I bought the soundtrack CD and that's pretty disturbing.
In MOST Western societies there are limits and checks on freespeech but it's always a tricky line to draw.
A great example of defending unpopular freedom of expression. Yep, larry Clark's a creep. No doubt that he's not "normal" whatever that means.
Still, Kids, I think, can still be a brutal wake-up call for teenagers who think that they're the first to be rebellious or sexually promiscuous. Unlike Ken Park, which didn't really have a message other than "How can you get your movie banned in the US?" Kids is one of his best works. If it makes you vomit, OK, but it's not like he's making kids do naughty things just for the hell of it in that movie.
Now, Brad, how do you feel about Don Imus?
I can actually rarely understand a word Imus says - I listen to Howard Stern and he's been saying that Imus was a racist for years so it appears at least slightly true - Stern actually fascinates me because he gets humor from retarded people and angry midgets which seems all king of wrong. You should be mocking the strong, but Stern is sort of empathetic in his retard mocking - as if he were "there but for the grace of god go I"





So you think Clark is a sick man and the film has one of the worst scenes ever, yet you advertise the DVD on Amazon? Kind of a mixed message, don't you think?
There are kids like the ones in "Kids" and that final scene was supposed to disturb and repulse you.