<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:16:44 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jet in Columbus  on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/16/161134.php#comment-684063</link>
<description>A poll for who you&#039;d vote for as President is being run on BCs Forum page. To add your voice &lt;a href=&quot;http://bcforums.org/index.php/topic,1490.0.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;click here&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">684063@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:16:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by steve on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/16/161134.php#comment-681081</link>
<description>they are both going to lose, so it doesnt really matter</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">681081@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:00:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ruvy in Jerusalem on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/16/161134.php#comment-681026</link>
<description>Heloise,

Blavatsky?  Helen Blavatsky returned as Kennedy?  And you are the returning spirit of John Kennedy?  So you are the returning spirit of Helen Blavatsky down the road a ways?  Do I comprehend this right, or have I missed something somewhere?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">681026@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:12:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Heloise on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/16/161134.php#comment-680970</link>
<description>Oh, lest I forget: Hillary was Calamity Jane, and Bill was Wild Bill Hickock. They were gunslingers rather than occulist. Bill was killed by a coward, shot in the head like other presidents. This is the reason he did not die nor killed in office. He had paid the karma forward, unlike JFK. I document it in &quot;Dinner&quot; but I ran out of space to give it full treatment.

Heloise</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">680970@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:51:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Heloise on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/16/161134.php#comment-680959</link>
<description>truth14,
You have really just made the case for Barack:

What you may not know, but would if you had read my book &quot;Dinner With DaVinci&quot; since I trace the past lives of many presidents and others close to them that one of the prerequisites for being president is having so called ties to the scary &quot;occult.&quot; 

Speaking of ties to the occult the very JFK was HPB. It don&#039;t get more occult than that. I also trace FDR. There is/was a good Web site by someone who made the JFK/HPB connection also, besides myself. I have lots of links at my yahoo group and other places.

But I am not saying much online anymore. I am getting it together in a book. Why, because the very writers who are complaining about not being paid are stealing my shit and ideas like crazy and I ain&#039;t getting a penny for it! 

I wrote &quot;Barack Who?&quot; for example and now there is a show &quot;Samantha Who?&quot; I will have to write a researched article about online writer influence one day. So, don&#039;t get me started.

Heloise </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">680959@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:09:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by truth14 on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/16/161134.php#comment-680734</link>
<description>Obama is leading now, but once the world knows that Oprah makes very bad judgment calls, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newspiritualbible.com/index1&quot;&gt;Obama may start losing his lead&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">680734@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:07:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Van Patten on &lt;i&gt;Boston Globe Breaks&lt;/i&gt; for Barack, &lt;i&gt;Des Moines Register&lt;/i&gt; for Hillary</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/12/16/161134.php#comment-680695</link>
<description>I work for a newspaper and it just bugs the crap out of me that candidates fawn all over the editorial boards to get endorsements, but spend such a small part of ad dollars in the same newspapers.
Conclusion: the campaign managers only want the endorsement so they can run TV spots. The candidates think newspaper readers are important. The media buyers don&#039;t want to buy newspapers because it involves work.

Who&#039;s stupider? The newspapers for thinking readers care? The candidate for thinking the endorsement matters? The media buyers who think newspaper readers aren&#039;t worth pursuing.

All of the above.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">680695@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:12:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>