DVD Review: Slings & Arrows - The Complete Collection
Published December 16, 2007
Seven years later they both have to deal with the anger, grief, and unresolved feelings between them, while working as actor and director and figuring out what to do about the fact that they've never stopped loving each other. Further clouding the issue is the looming presence of Oliver Wells between them. Not only is his legacy all around them, the Macbeth Geoffrey has to stage is expected by all to be based on extensive notes and designs that Oliver left behind, but Geoffrey is literally being haunted by Oliver's ghost.
At first Geoffrey tries to dismiss it as a delusion, but gradually he comes to accept that Oliver is really there, and refusing to acknowledge his presence only makes matters worse. Of course it does nothing to reassure others that his history of mental illness is in the past when he is seen having conversations and arguing with the someone who isn't there. But in the end ghost and man begin to take pleasure in each other's company.
The creators of Slings & Arrows could have taken any number of approaches to the series — satire, farce, or even melodramatic soap opera. Instead they took a path that's not often traveled on this continent when it comes to television, and avoided taking any approach at all. Like the theatre itself, Slings & Arrows is larger than life, but if characters and situations are exaggerated, it is never beyond the realm of believability and always to serve the aims of the script. There's not a cheap laugh or manipulated sentiment to be seen as the script, direction, and actors work together to write a love letter to the object of their mutual affection — the theatre.
As I had assumed the acting is exceptional from the smallest of bit parts to the leads. Paul Gross, Martha Burns, Stephen Ouimette, Susan Coyne, and Mark McKinney (the latter two were also two-thirds of the writing team) as the five leads give wonderful performances. Burns in particular handles the extremely difficult task of making a flamboyant character realistic by allowing the person under the actor's mask to show through as often as possible without it appearing to be a conscious effort.
Then there's the Shakespeare. I don't remember the last time that I've seen such universally wonderful handling of the text by all the actors required to speak the dialogue. For those of you who have ever feared Shakespearean language and say it's impossible to understand, I challenge you to retain that opinion after watching any of the episodes in Slings & Arrows where they venture onto the stage and perform.
- DVD Review: Slings & Arrows - The Complete Collection
- Published: December 16, 2007
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Television, Video: Drama, Video: Comedy, Culture: Arts
- Writer: Richard Marcus
- Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
- Richard Marcus's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Oops
I don't how I forgot that - I think I just fixated on the aging actor Lear thing too much - apologies and thanks for the correction.
cheers
Richard Marcus


Richard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at 









Wonderful review, but I do want to set one thing straight -- William Hutt's amazing final performance at Stratford was not of Lear, but of Prospero in "The Tempest."