NEWS

Mitchell Report Is Ultimately Inconsequential

Written by Sal Marinello
Published December 15, 2007

In the aftermath of the release of the Mitchell Report pundits and fans alike have been expressing a variety of opinions and emotions associated with certain big name players being either in of out of the Mitchell Report, simply known as “the list.”

Nobody should get too comfortable just yet. If anything everyone needs to brace themselves, prepare themselves, for the other bigger and more damaging shoe to drop in the form of the federal investigation into the steroid issue, the investigation that relies heavily on the testimony of former New York Mets clubhouse boy Kirk Radomski.

On page 139 of the Mitchell Report, the second paragraph, Mitchell states that Radomski’s involvement with this investigation was done in cooperation with the federal government, and that anything Radomski told Mitchell and included in his report was approved by the feds. Furthermore, Mitchell could not use anything Radomski told him that dealt with anything involving the ongoing federal investigation. Certainly the feds weren’t going to let Mitchell do or say anything to compromise their long-term, high-profile and no doubt expensive investigation.

Of course the apologists and sports pundits who don’t want to deal with this issue and wish that it would just go away will criticize the Mitchell Report as being unnecessary, too expensive, flawed, etc. The sports reporters who are being critical of the report and questioning Mitchell’s motives are the same guys who didn’t want to be bothered with looking into how and why baseball players started to resemble pro wrestlers, and how and why 40-year olds were bigger, stronger and just as effective as – and in some cases better than - 25-year olds.

But the Mitchell Report is just an appetizer, a side salad that’s being served before the main course. And that main course is the 3-pound steak in the form of the indictment that will come as a result of the federal investigation that involves BALCO Labs, Barry Bonds, Victor Conte, Greg Anderson, Kirk Radomski, various Olympic and other athletes, Signature Pharmacy, and others. The critics of the Mitchell Report are being incredibly myopic when they claim the feds were used by baseball to intimidate witnesses into testifying and naming names.

page 1 | 2
Sal Marinello is a National Strength and Conditioning Association Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist and Certified Personal Trainer, a U.S.A. Weightlifting Certified Coach, a full-time, private Professional Strength and Conditioning Coach, an assistant football coach and a Head Strength Coach for a suburban New Jersey High School. He writes a lot and has no free time.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Mitchell Report Is Ultimately Inconsequential
Published: December 15, 2007
Type: News
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Culture: Crime and Court, Sports: Baseball
Writer: Sal Marinello
Sal Marinello's BC Writer page
Sal Marinello's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Sal Marinello
Culture: Crime and Court
Sports: Baseball
All Sports Articles
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 15, 2007 @ 15:39PM — alessandro

Actually, you're right. That's how they take down mob syndicates and families. It's probably how they got Vito Rizutto - 25 years of data and info. they collected.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/72000)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments