NEWS

RJ's NFL Picks, Week Fifteen

Written by RJ Elliott
Published December 12, 2007
Part of NFL Picks
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

RJ's Pick - Dallas by 14

Washington (6-7) at New York Giants (9-4) - 8:15 pm (Sheridan's line: New York Giants by 4) [Worth Watching!]

Hey, the Redskins actually won a game last week! They had dropped four in a row prior to that. At 6-7, they still have a credible chance of getting the final Wild Card playoff berth in the CFL NFC. The Giants have all but sewn up the fifth seed Wild Card spot. Expect a close one.

RJ's Pick - New York Giants by 2

*Monday, December 17, 2007*

Chicago (5-8) at Minnesota (7-6) - 8:30 pm (Sheridan's line: Minnesota by 9.5) [Worth Watching!]

The Bears are pretty much finished for the season after last week's loss. From the Super Bowl to last place in the NFC North in just one year; such is life in the present-day NFL. The Vikings have won four in a row, and would make the playoffs as the sixth seed if the season ended today. However, the season does not end today; there are still three more games to be played. QB Tarvaris Jackson has actually looked pretty good in his last three outings, so he's certainly due to have a four-interception game. Rookie RB Adrian Peterson was held to just 3 yards on 14 carries last week, showing just how inconsistent he can be. I'm going with the upset.

RJ's Pick - Chicago by 3

(If you're interested, you can check out the full list of Danny Sheridan's Odds and ESPN's NFL "Expert" Picks.)

2007 Weekly Results
Week One - 11-5
Week Two - 9-7
Week Three - 10-6
Week Four - 7-7
Week Five - 9-5
Week Six - 10-3
Week Seven - 9-5
Week Eight - 10-3
Week Nine - 9-5
Week Ten - 7-7
Week Eleven – 10-6
Week Twelve – 10-6
Week Thirteen – 7-9
Week Fourteen – 12-4

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
RJ Elliott is a graduate student at the University Of Central Florida. His passions in life are sports, politics, nature, and women who have piercings they never told their daddy about. He dislikes daytime television, left-wing dictators, and people who talk like Garrison Keillor. He is ambivalent about the names "Trig" and "Piper."
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
RJ's NFL Picks, Week Fifteen
Published: December 12, 2007
Type: News
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Sports: Football (American)
Part of a feature: NFL Picks
Writer: RJ Elliott
RJ Elliott's BC Writer page
RJ Elliott's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by RJ Elliott
Sports: Football (American)
All Sports Articles
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 13, 2007 @ 00:59AM — alessandro

Houston.

Gee, things sure are quiet 'round here without Suss. He's a big shot writing about fugo or tofo or sofa or something. We're nothing to him now. NOTHING.

#2 — December 13, 2007 @ 01:00AM — zingzing

but which sex toy do you prefer?

(that's for picking chicago.)

*go vikes*

#3 — December 13, 2007 @ 14:21PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Does anybody think I should continue writing these columns during the playoffs? I mean, instead of 13 or 14 or 16 games per week to write about, there would only be four games during the first two rounds, then just two games, and then of course the Super Bowl. Feedback appreciated.

#4 — December 13, 2007 @ 14:48PM — Christopher Rose [URL]

sure, just go into a bit more detail.

#5 — December 13, 2007 @ 15:24PM — Bennett

Okay, here goes... Based on my own formula taking into account win/loss, gut feeling, coin toss, and uncertain brain chemistry

Cincinnati
New England
Baltimore
Cleveland
Tennessee
Tampa Bay
Green Bay
Jacksonville
Seattle
Indianapolis
San Diego
Dallas
New York
Minnesota

I say keep up the column right through the SB.

#6 — December 13, 2007 @ 15:34PM — Chris McVetta

I think you should keep on, keepin' on, RJ! Heck, if Matt Millen keeps going ...why can't you??? (That was NOT a jab at you, RJ ...honest and true ...but, seriously, what kind of blackmail material does this guy HAVE to keep his job, year after year...?)

#7 — December 13, 2007 @ 17:28PM — Brian

Couldn't hurt to keep picking. I'm sure there are some crazy pick-um pools that start just for playoffs or continue that far.

I have a question or ya R.J. about your picks though.

When you have a spread like:
Washington (6-7) at New York Giants (9-4) - 8:15 pm (Sheridan's line: New York Giants by 4)

And you Pick:
RJ's Pick - New York Giants by 2

Are you saying the NYG's will actually win by 2 and therefore not cover?

Or that they will win by 2 over the spread... in this case 6 points?

#8 — December 13, 2007 @ 17:52PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Bennett:

Thanks for your picks, but you missed a couple of games (Denver-Houston and Arizona-New Orleans).

Chris:

I think William Clay Ford, Sr. simply hates the hometown fans. That's the only thing I can think of.

Brian:

I pick the winner and the margin of victory for every game. So, for example, I believe the Giants will win this week by 2 points (say, a final score of 22-20). If you are counting straight-up pick 'em, then I'm picking the Giants to win the game. If you are counting spread picks, then I don't think the Giants will cover the 4 point spread. I keep track of both my straight-up picks and my spread picks over the course of the season.

REMF:

Wishing you a delightful holiday season.

#9 — December 13, 2007 @ 17:54PM — eastcoastlb

He means they will win by 2 and not cover.

RJ you HAVE to keep on writing! I look forward to this every Thursday night. It's part of my system when I make picks for my pool.

Open to anyone - if you had to pick 1 game(team) this week to beat the spread who would you pick?

#10 — December 13, 2007 @ 18:35PM — Bennett

Ack! That's the brain chemistry I mentioned...

Houston (over the hated Broncos)
Arizona (in honor of Temple Stark)

Have a great weekend!

#11 — December 13, 2007 @ 18:42PM — alessandro

Definitely. Go for it. The playoffs are cool.

#12 — December 14, 2007 @ 00:38AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Texans 31, Denver 13 - RJ 1-0

#13 — December 14, 2007 @ 20:53PM — alessandro

RJ, you think the coming snow storm will effect NE's chances? Weather may stand in the way of their perfect season. We're expecting 40 to 60cm in Montreal. I'm going to be fucken buried in snow.

Cincinnati, TB, Baltimore (I want to take Miami soooo bad), Cleveland (going with home field here), GB, NE, Seattle, Tennessee, Indy, SD, Dallas (fricken Cowgirls), NYG, Minnesota, Pittsburgh (for no better reason that home field. Jacksonville as good as they are have not topped the so-called big teams enough to merit a pick here) and NO (again playing it safe with the home side. Anything can happen in these games.)

That Romo clip is priceless! Whoever chose Ti Amo for this is hilarious. Growing up in these parts that song was big for the slow dances. Huge hit in Italy.

#14 — December 15, 2007 @ 02:49AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Alessandro:

Yes, the weather could be a factor. In fact, I would like to amend my pick.

New England by 41

;-P

#15 — December 15, 2007 @ 12:04PM — DOM @ HSU

vikings
chargers
cardinals.. (red bird of some sort)
49ers
Baltimore.. does not want to be the team to lose against the fins.

everything else the same...

#16 — December 15, 2007 @ 15:41PM — Alexandria [URL]

CIN, SEA, CLE, TN, MIA (they gotta win one), NE, NO, PIT, GB, TB, IND, DAL, SD, NYG, MN

RJ, keep writing if you can. I mostly like your anecdotal comments.

#17 — December 16, 2007 @ 02:10AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Final Score:

SF 20, Bengals 13 - RJ 1-1

#18 — December 16, 2007 @ 04:06AM — DOM @ HSU

niners.. haha i money lined that spitt..

#19 — December 16, 2007 @ 08:31AM — YuTang

RJ, What effect and what cities is this storm going to hit, cheers.

#20 — December 16, 2007 @ 09:34AM — Bennett

I don't like the weather factor in today's NE/NYJ game. It brings the random element more into play. I'd rather this match up was in less severe weather...

If the Pats go into this game overconfident, they could end up on the short end.

What's with Cincinnati?

Bennett 1-1

#21 — December 16, 2007 @ 12:56PM — alessandro

Five minutes to kick off. Maybe it's the wine kicking in but I'm amending my pick to Miami. Sue me.

#22 — December 16, 2007 @ 17:04PM — Bennett

I should have shared that bottle alessandro... Good pick!

I'm 7-4 at this point

#23 — December 16, 2007 @ 17:17PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Final Scores:

NO 31, Arizona 24 - RJ 2-1

TB 37, Atlanta 3 - RJ 3-1

Miami 22, Baltimore 16 (in OT) - RJ 4-1

#24 — December 16, 2007 @ 17:21PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Final Scores:

Cleveland 8, Bills 0 (!) - RJ 5-1

Gren Bay 33, Rams 14 - RJ 6-1

Jacksonville 29, Pittsburgh 22 - RJ 6-2

#25 — December 16, 2007 @ 17:26PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Final Scores:

New England 20, Jets 10 - RJ 7-2

Carolina 13, Seattle 10 - RJ 7-3

Tennessee 26, KC 17 - RJ 8-3

#26 — December 16, 2007 @ 17:30PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

ESPN's NFL "experts" through 11 games:

Wickersham 6-5
Salisbury 6-5
Hoge 7-4
Jaworski 7-4
Schlereth 6-5
Allen 6-5
Mortensen 8-3
Golic 7-4
Accuscore 6-5

#27 — December 16, 2007 @ 19:08PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Colts 21, Oakland 14 - RJ 9-3

#28 — December 16, 2007 @ 19:09PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Kitna just threw his fifth INT of the game...oy...

#29 — December 16, 2007 @ 19:26PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Final Scores:

SD 51(!), Detroit 14 - RJ 9-4

Eagles 10, Dallas 6 - RJ 9-5

#30 — December 16, 2007 @ 20:43PM — DOM @ HSU

9-5... luckily i started Warner this week.. heh..

#31 — December 16, 2007 @ 22:35PM — Travis

Your a cock.....Chicago....you must be retarded...or a lions fan.

Fritz

#32 — December 16, 2007 @ 23:49PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Final Score:

Washington 22, Giants 10 - RJ 9-6

#33 — December 16, 2007 @ 23:51PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Wickersham 8-7
Salisbury 8-7
Hoge 9-6
Jaworski 9-6
Schlereth 8-7
Allen 8-7
Mortensen 11-4
Golic 9-6
Accuscore 6-5(?)

#34 — December 17, 2007 @ 09:15AM — Bennett

9-6

As long as good at this as the experts...

#35 — December 17, 2007 @ 17:02PM — Bennett

Foc,

"as long as I'm as good at this as the experts"...

Jeez, wake up before you type!

#36 — December 18, 2007 @ 02:30AM — DOM @ HSU

they screwed acuscore over so the experts would beat it..

#37 — December 18, 2007 @ 02:35AM — DOM @ HSU

10-6 this week.... that would of been heck of a call with Chicago RJ.. almost like dom picking the Niners over the Bengals.. Bears should of one.... they must of had a great inspirational speech at halftime.. (sarcasm)

#38 — December 18, 2007 @ 03:58AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Final Score:

Vikings 20, Bears 13 - RJ 9-7

#39 — December 18, 2007 @ 04:01AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Wickersham 9-7
Salisbury 9-7
Hoge 10-6
Jaworski 9-6
Schlereth 9-7
Allen 9-7
Mortensen 12-4
Golic 10-6
Accuscore 9-7(?)

#40 — December 18, 2007 @ 04:07AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

I went 10-6 ATS this week...

#41 — December 18, 2007 @ 04:57AM — YuTang

Oh and Fritz, Chicago covered the spread, now who is the c*ck, lol.

#42 — December 19, 2007 @ 18:32PM — eastcoastlb

Today my worked blocked this site! Ugh totally not cool!

#43 — December 20, 2007 @ 17:28PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

My Week 16 column is now available.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/71919)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments