Book Review: America's War On Sex by Marty Klein
Published December 07, 2007
“Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign… [T]he only purpose for which government may rightfully exercise power… over anyone is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.”
- John Stuart Mill, 1859 essay On Liberty
“Puritanism - the haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy.”
- H.L. Mencken
Do you have or want to have sex? If so, are you willing to limit your sexual expression to the missionary position within the confines of state-sanctioned marriage? If your answer to the first question is “yes,” and the second “no,” you ought to read Marty Klein’s book America’s War on Sex as soon as possible.
Since the onset of the second Bush presidency, we’ve all become familiar with the term “culture war.” (Although its roots go back as far as the Reagan era and the Moral Majority. Someone, I forget who, once said, “The Moral Majority is neither moral nor a majority.“) I’d always thought of this “war” in terms of free speech, prayer in the schools, displaying the Ten Commandments in government buildings or nativity scenes in public places, the separation of church and state, and abortion, contraception and family planning controversy.
The culture war has always been framed as the Right vs. the Left, Republicans vs. Democrats, Conservatives vs. Liberals, theocracy vs. democracy, and science vs. faith. It seems that over the last seven years, the conservatives led by George W. Bush and his faith-based initiatives appear to be winning.
It never occurred to me that President Bush wanted to eliminate the right of the American people to acquire dildos. That’s right. Dildos.
According to Klein, “The state of Alabama has been in and out of court, trying to criminalize the sale of vibrators for a decade. When a U.S. district judge ruled against the state ban on sex-toy sales - twice - the state appealed - twice. Finally, a federal court actually ruled that the government has a compelling interest in keeping ‘orgasm stimulating paraphernalia’ out of our hands. Were they concerned that women would stop having sex with their husbands if they could buzz off with a vibrator?”
Klein goes on to write in depth on the various “battlegrounds” the Right has chosen to fight:
1. Sex Education
Abstinence-only programs. Do they work? No.
a. In Minnesota, sexual activity of junior high school participants in an abstinence program doubled.
- Professional Data Analysts, Inc. and Professional Evaluation Services, “Minnesota Education Now and Babies Later Evaluation Report 1998-2002,” as prepared for the Minnesota Department of Health, January 2004.
b. Young people who take a virginity pledge are one-third less likely than those who don’t to use contraception when they become sexually active.
- Peter Bearman and Hannah Brickner, “Promising the Future: Virginity Pledges and the Transition to First Intercourse,” American Journal of Sociology 106, no. 4 (2001): 859-912.
- Book Review: America's War On Sex by Marty Klein
- Published: December 07, 2007
- Type: Review
- Section: Books
- Filed Under: Books: Nonfiction, Books: Politics and Affairs
- Writer: David R. Farthing
- David R. Farthing's BC Writer page
- David R. Farthing's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Thank you Janet for correcting my mistake. I will go to the site you suggested so I can be better informed.
From my poem Venus and Adonis:
Call it not Love for Love to heaven is fled
since sweating lust on earth usurp'd His name.
Under whose simple semblance man hath fed
upon fresh beauty blotting it with blame,
Which the hot tyrant stains and soon bereaves
as caterpillars do the tender leaves.
Love comforteth like sunshine after rain
But lusts effect is tempest afte sun.
Love's gentle spring doth alwlays fresh remain
Lust's winter comes ere summer half be done.
Love surfeit not, lust like a glutton dies,
Love is all truth, lust full of forged lies.
RU-486 is NOT the morning after pill. The morning after pill goes by a few brand names e.g. 'Plan B' and 'Levonelle'. The active ingredient is 'levornogestrel' which is a progesterone. It is not an abortifacient and will cause no harm to an established pregnancy. It works in exactly the same way as regular hormonal birth control, just in a single dose - it delays ovulation so that there will be no egg to be fertilised.
Much of the Plan B's bad press comes from this confusion. It is counterintuitive that one should be able to use a method of contraception after the deed is already done, but in fact it takes several days for a pregnancy to establish itself. Most doctors and pharmacists refer to is as 'emergency contraception' rather than 'the morning after pill' in order to emphasise this.
I would appreciate it if the facts could be corrected in this article - they do more harm than you'd think.
Some good sites (easily the best site on the net about EC) and (for general sexual health and politics) to learn more.
Dear Sweetrush: I will be happy to correct this article. Expect this correction to appear soon. Thank you for your comment.




Emergency contraception (sometimes called the Morning After Pill) is not the same thing as RU-486. The former is a post-coital form of contraception, the latter is used for medical abortions. Follow this link on the Web site of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals to learn more about the differences between the two drugs.
This is the paragraph from your blog that confuses the two:
As a result of this political activity on the part of what Klein calls "erotophobes" (people who hate anything sexy), most states now allow pharmacists to refuse to fill any legal prescription, though they usually refuse to fill RU-486 (the morning-after pill). New laws are being enacted to protect pharmacists who then refuse to refer patients to other pharmacies that will help them.