REVIEW

Movie Review: Beowulf Gives 'Em That New Razzle-Dazzle, But Not Much More

Written by Vyrdolak
Published December 07, 2007

A review of Robert Zemeckis' CGI opus, Beowulf, could fairly consist of the words, "visually, it's breathtaking and a stunning special effects achievement," repeated some one hundred times, because there isn't much more to say about this film. The acting — or voice-acting, rather, since the performers themselves are completely overlaid with CGI — is uniformly good, which always enhances an animated film.

The script, by Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary, is fair, with hyperbolic dialogue befitting an adaptation of an epic hero's tale. I didn't find Unferth's (John Malkovich) change of heart toward Beowulf near the end to be quite convincing, but that may have been another demonstration of this character's shallowness. Ray Winstone plays Beowulf with earnest fervor and puts more depth into the role than the script gives him. King Hrothgar is classic Anthony Hopkins, over the top and chewing up more of the sets than Grendel does, but as enjoyable as always. Brendan Gleeson transcends his animated shell as Beowulf's closest friend Wiglaf.

As dazzling as Beowulf is, I left the theatre feeling disappointed, as though I'd worked on a hard task for hours and been paid in Christmas tree tinsel. I didn't see the movie in 3-D, but it was obvious how the shots had been designed to exploit this additional gimmick. Beowulf is unremittingly loud, fast, and brutally violent, and the fact that we're seeing cartoon violence with no emotional consequences doesn't alleviate the impact. After you're hit over the head enough times in a row, you just get numb. Yes, visually, it's breathtaking and a stunning special effects achievement. But I'm tired of every frame of a movie blowing up in my face like a Fourth of July fireworks finale. Often, such pyrotechnics are meant to hide the fact that the film has nothing else to offer.

There is little character development in Beowulf, although some interesting moral and ethical issues arise. Gaiman's adaptation follows the framework of the poem, beginning with Grendel's attack on Hrothgar's "cursed" mead hall, Beowulf's arrival, Grendel's defeat, his mother's retaliation, Beowulf confronting Grendel's Mother, and then jumping ahead fifty years to Beowulf's final battle with a dragon in his old age. Gaiman adds some archetypal elements drawn in part from other mythic sources. As another reviewer noted, the ending of Beowulf invokes the death of King Arthur at the hands of his bastard son, Mordred. Like the Arthur legends, Beowulf repeats a warning to men: if you're faced with a beautiful, inhuman temptress, keep it in your pants, or you will be very, very sorry. The final shot of Beowulf echoes the final shot of John Boorman's Excalibur (1981). Although early Christianity makes an appearance, we're left uncertain what the film is trying to say about it. The strong tension between Paganism and Christianity in Beowulf's time is outlined more clearly in the 2006 movie, Beowulf & Grendel. Gaiman's Beowulf has no obvious ideological or religious grounding. He's simply a generic Hero.

page 1 | 2
Inanna Arthen (Vyrdolak) is the creator of the website By Light Unseen, owner of the small press By Light Unseen Media and author of Mortal Touch. An authority on vampire lore, Forteana and alternative culture, she is a fascinated observer and commentator on the fancies and follies of the human condition.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Beowulf Gives 'Em That New Razzle-Dazzle, But Not Much More
Published: December 07, 2007
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Fantasy, Video: Animation, Video: Adventure
Writer: Vyrdolak
Vyrdolak's BC Writer page
Vyrdolak's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Vyrdolak
Video: Fantasy
Video: Animation
Video: Adventure
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 7, 2007 @ 21:01PM — Jennifer Linforth [URL]

I had been pondering this movie given the hype about its use of CGI. Sounds like the movie was created more for the awe of special effects. I prefer a classic done the old fashion way--and with good plot structure and character development.

Excellent review. I liked the details you picked out. The depiction of women for example and historical authenticity. Historical details are a must for me. I was planning on passing on seeing this film to begin with. I definitely will do so now.

#2 — January 18, 2008 @ 02:09AM — Kevin Kohout [URL]

Good movie. Stereotypical of women being helpless in these types of movies is just describing a part of nature.

#3 — January 25, 2008 @ 21:19PM — Kevin Kohout [URL]

I still like this movie.

#4 — January 26, 2008 @ 14:42PM — Vyrdolak [URL]

Oh, there were things about the movie that I liked, too, Kevin. I thought the script could have been stronger, so I was disappointed by that. And even the SFX would have been better if they hadn't been so obviously angled to exploit the 3-D gimmick (how will that translate to the DVD, I wonder?). Certainly, the CGI visuals were *amazing.* But I like a movie that makes me think, too.

As far as weak women being "natural"--ask your mother what she thinks of that point of view, Kevin! Given that women raise all the kids--if it was "natural" for them to be *that* helpless, the human species would have been extinct before discovery of fire!

#5 — March 4, 2008 @ 11:02AM — patrick [URL]

watched Beowulf recently, i appreciate the fact that it gives me at least a pseudo-education in ancient literature (i was never forced to read Beowulf as a kid)

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/71754)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments