OPINION

Islamic Lynch Mob Hounds Taslima Nasrin: Walking in Footsteps of the Prophet

Written by Muhammad Hussain
Published November 28, 2007
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

The departure of the Muslim community from Mecca was completed. Muhammad arrived in Medina on 21 June 622 CE to a hero’s welcome from his eagerly awaiting disciples, from Mecca and Medina combined.

Muhammad took about six months to build a communal abode for his community. Once his community comfortably settled, there came time for revenge against the Quraysh for rejecting his faith. Quraysh’s rejection of Muhammad’s creed, as described in the Quran―“to prevent access to the path of Allah, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members"―became tantamount to “Tumult and oppression,” which in turn was “worse than slaughter” [Quran 2:217].

Thereupon, Allah sanctioned Jihad or Holy war upon the Muslims to “fight them [Quraysh] on until there is no more Tumult or oppression [ie, rejection of Islam & practice of idolatry], and there prevail justice and faith in Allah” [Quran 2:193]. Muslims must “slay them [Quraysh idolaters] wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out” [Quran 2:191]. In other words, Muslims must take upon a mission exterminate the idolater Quraysh from Mecca once and for all.

For those Muslims, who did not like fighting as it involved violence and even bloodbath―they still had to fight, because: “Fighting [Jihad] is prescribed for you [by Allah], and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not” [Quran 2:216].

Having Jihad made an obligatory duty on all Muslims; Prophet Muhammad started sending his armed comrades in search of trade-caravans from Mecca to plunder them. Prophet himself pursued a few caravans; but they escaped before the messenger of Allah could be there on time. The first success came in January 624 at Nakhla, 9 days’ journey from Medina and only 2 days’ from Mecca. In the attack, one of the Quraysh attending the caravan was killed, two taken captive and another managed to flee. The raiders returned to Medina with the rich booty and two prisoners. The latter were ransomed bringing more revenue for the Prophet.

But, it was the sacred month of Rajab in which fighting was prohibited in Arabian tradition. This bloodbath, therefore, created unhappiness among the people of Medina and the region, Prophet’s disciples included. Allah made this illegal holy-month attack and bloodbath justified claiming that the ‘Tumult and Oppression’ [ie, the rejection of Allah’s religion] committed by the Quraysh was “worse than [the] slaughter,” which his henchmen committed at Nakhla: “They ask thee concerning fighting in the Prohibited Month. Say: "Fighting therein is a grave (offence); but graver is it in the sight of Allah to prevent access to the path of Allah, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members." Tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter” [Quran 2:217].

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Alamgir Hussain (PhD) is a co-author in 'Beyond Jihad - Critical Voices from Inside' (Academica Press). He has completed writing a new book entitled, 'History of Islam -- Separating Myths from Reality'.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Islamic Lynch Mob Hounds Taslima Nasrin: Walking in Footsteps of the Prophet
Published: November 28, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Society, Politics: International, Politics: Law and Rights
Writer: Muhammad Hussain
Muhammad Hussain's BC Writer page
Muhammad Hussain's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Muhammad Hussain
Culture: Society
Politics: International
Politics: Law and Rights
All Politics Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 29, 2007 @ 18:41PM — RJ [URL]

Very interesting. Thanks for the article.

#2 — November 29, 2007 @ 18:43PM — The Obnoxious American

Kind of scary.

#3 — November 30, 2007 @ 07:50AM — SP

Muslims are graetest threat to Indian security. The socalled moderates also are apologists not really mindful of the violence by the militants. Except in FFI I have not come across any muslim who unapologitically found fault with the violent attitudes of muslims in sttling things

#4 — November 30, 2007 @ 08:48AM — Alamgir Hussain

SP, obviously India has suffered terribly from her Muslim problem, especially over Kashmir, since its birth. The worst days are still to come from wider Muslim community.

We hear Bangladesh is going to go under water in 4-5 decades. If India is to bear the burden, that's going to add to India's troubles big time.

Indian Hindus almost universally condemn the British Raj for dividing India; not so much for the economic exploitation. In reality, the Partition was the biggest gift from the British -- although not many would buy it.

#5 — December 1, 2007 @ 05:17AM — Shyam Roy

Everyone in this planet has an explicit right to criticize his or her own religion and express views on any subject except the use of violent and profane language. If Islam or any religion for that matter is great, then it should be able to withstand any criticism from its followers. That could not be construed as insult. The problem is Islam is religion that is extremely derogatory to women like covering them with burqa, four wives per man, and no rights for women etc. like no other religion in this planet. What Taslima did is to speak against the evils of Islam and the atrocities of the Moslems in Bangladesh against Hindu minorities like force to marry one daughter to a Moslem for Islamification of the Hindu families in Bangladesh. Taslima, being an elite intellectual of Bangladesh, spoke against the evils of her own religion, own society, and own country. Being a woman of Islam is a crime in itself.

Being a woman in Bangladesh and India is no easy picnic either. In Bangladesh and India particularly West Bengal, women including female children, have no more rights than family pets. Scores of girls, women, and even female fetus are abused or tortured, or killed every single day under a variety of pretexts in these regions every single day. In Bangladesh, under the Law of Sharia and in West Bengal under the communist rule, the funeral of Democracy has been over a long long time ago. Thus, pushing for democratic rights or talking about that is nothing more than intellectual mumbo jumbo. Under these poisonous conditions of these societies, women are expected to be tortured and suffer in quiet pain and not expected to oppose or speak against let alone write about it.

Taslima Nasrin dared to write and chronicle them in magnificent eloquence that should be must reading for all high school students in all societies. That is not to put any religion on the spot but to start a Jihad against the abuse of women in this planet start a movement fro true equal rights fro men and women.


Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/71436)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments