OPINION

Patriots Critics: The Enemy of the Great

Written by James David Dickson
Published November 27, 2007

"52 points? [Was that] really necessary?" my girlfriend texted, as the New England Patriots put the final nail in the Washington Redskins' coffin a few weeks ago.

"They have coaches and players, too," I responded, writing off her opinion as that of the novice sports fan. "One day," I explained, "they'll need to convert a tough fourth down — why not get the practice against a live defense?"

It all seemed so logical then. And, had I not been watching ESPN the next day, I would've lived my life believing that only novices thought that way. But it didn't take long for the boys from Around the Horn to duel over who could display his contempt for Bill Belichick most loudly. Pardon the Interruption host Michael Wilbon was kind enough to defend Belichick by reasoning that little should be expected from "a liar and a cheat."

"But what about the children?" critics ask. Won't they learn bad sportsmanship from the Pats? Isn't this why children's sports often have the Mercy Rule, which ends games early rather than souring children on sports by making them stick it out during big losses?

If you're like most people, myself included, senior night in high school was the end of your sporting career. In the years since you started playing sports, you'd probably learned to win (or lose) with class, to respect your opponent, to be able to give him a firm handshake and a confident "Good Game" afterwards, win, lose, or draw.

The NFL is a bit different. The basic rules of sportsmanship still apply, sure. We like seeing players from opposing teams help each other up and slap each other on the helmets after they make a play. When the coaches go to midfield to shake hands, and the players gather in a circle at midfield to give thanks for being paid millions to play a kid's game, we nudge that little footballer nearby as if to say "you see that? That's sportsmanship. That's the right way to compete."

But none of that has anything to do with what's on the scoreboard (Belichick's handshakes are the subject of another day). I'm not only arguing that it's not wrong to "run up the score" in professional sports; I'm arguing it's impossible. Let's face it: in a National Football League built on parity — what with salary caps, free agency, revenue-sharing and the draft — teams that lose aren't doing so for lack of talent.

page 1 | 2 | 3
James David Dickson is the Collegiate Network Fellow at The American Spectator.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Patriots Critics: The Enemy of the Great
Published: November 27, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Sports: Football (American)
Writer: James David Dickson
James David Dickson's BC Writer page
James David Dickson's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by James David Dickson
Sports: Football (American)
All Sports Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 27, 2007 @ 15:53PM — FilteringCraig [URL]

Nobody is taking credit away from the Pats. In fact, after hearing Al Michaels talk about the gaudy spread that Vegas put on the Pats vs. Eagles during the Sunday Night broadcast, to think that the Pats aren't getting credit is patently false.

The fact is that everyone respects and credits the Pats for being the better team on basically every field they touch. What they are pointing out week in and week out is just how far this Pats team has fallen into the reputation of being the new "evil empire."

Spy Gate was part of it. Randy Moss magically starting to play again is part of it. Belichick's demeanor and complete lack of personality is part of it. There is nary a sympathetic storyline to be had from this Patriots team as they roll over teams week after week and go for it on fourth down in enemy territory with the games easily in hand.

Don't confuse this negative portrayal with not giving the Pats credit for their dominance. Everyone is quite deferential to that fact. But also, don't let your fanhood get in the way of realizing that the rest of the world sees the Pats as the latest in a long line of Goliath-types that they want to see chopped at the knees.

#2 — November 27, 2007 @ 16:21PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

belichick's demeanor? this is something new?

randy moss...hmmm, maybe being part of a great set of receivers has something to do with it...and then there's the guy named brady.

#3 — November 27, 2007 @ 17:59PM — Craig Lyndall [URL]

Randy Moss admitted he used to not try. I wonder if he used to cash those paychecks?

I understand NE fans loving him, but is there any reason in the world why it should be a feel-good story for anyone who isn't a Pats fan?

#4 — November 28, 2007 @ 02:01AM — RJ [URL]

Moss and TO are both having outstanding seasons. But they are both still childish, selfish prima donnas. A winning record has brought about a positive attitude, but it's only temporary; it's not internal to their nature.

#5 — November 28, 2007 @ 12:15PM — James David Dickson

I don't think the media treat the Patriots players unfairly. I think that they hate the coach so much that it seeps into what should be balanced and fair analysis. Think what you want about Belichick, but to tell him to call off the dogs against another NFL team is unfair and unrealistic.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/71365)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments