OPINION

Racism: Be Part of the Problem, Or Be the Solution

Written by Hilary Margaret
Published November 08, 2007

I was watching a rerun of Frasier online the other day when I heard a piece of dialogue that stuck out. It was one of the many episodes in which Roz, Frasier’s producer, is desperately seeking love, or at least some fulfillment of her carnal desires. She expresses a casual interest in one of the male interns, who is probably nineteen years old. Frasier pesters Roz for being attracted to someone young enough to be her son and Roz boldly challenges the double standards of our society.

She asks Frasier why men who date younger women are more socially acceptable than women who date younger men. Frasier chuckles lightly, and then responds: “I don’t make the rules Roz, I just enjoy them.”

This is not about Frasier. In fact, in the same episode Frasier and Niles express concerns about our society's standards of feminine beauty and the difficulties women face as they age - concerns that typically stem from a feminist point of view. But the piece of this interaction that struck the strongest chord was Frasier’s response to the disparities and discrimination in our society. Though the dialogue served a comedic purpose, in reality, many people respond to social injustice in that very manner, particularly when they are not negatively affected by such injustice.

In this instance a rich, white male expresses apathy toward a societal norm of gender discrimination and double standards. Frasier behaves as if he holds no responsibility in eliminating such injustices, when in fact it is quite the opposite. As a member of the most privileged group in America (educated, wealthy, heterosexual, white, male), Frasier holds more responsibility than most. If one is not actively engaged in opposing the white supremacist, capitalist, patriarchal patterns of society, then he or she is a part of the problem. In this case you’re either for us or against us.

Being actively anti-racist/sexist/etc. doesn’t necessarily mean participating in protests or rallies. It doesn’t mean putting support stickers on your car, although these are fine ways to express your sentiments. Being actively anti-disparity should manifest itself in your everyday activity. Rather than sitting back and enjoying the advantages you have over the less fortunate (and no matter who you are, especially in America, there are always the less fortunate), you should refuse to accept those advantages, and work towards raising the awareness of those around you.

When you hear someone objectifying a woman, say something. You don’t have to cause a huge argument, but you can voice your concerns in a kind and compassionate manner. If you hear a racist joke, you can simply ask questions. “Do you really mean that?” The response you get will most likely be, “Of course not, I just think it’s funny.” When left unchallenged, people rarely change.

When society thinks humor should depend on the tragic circumstances of others, or condescending to an entire race of people, the state of those people becomes normalized and accepted as reality. You cannot allow yourself to sit back and relax, knowing how many sacrifices other people made for the Lay-Z-Boy chair you so effortlessly occupy. “Be the change.”

Hilary is a Professional Writing student at the University of Oklahoma. Currently pursuing a degree in PW, Women's Studies and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Environment. Outside of school she works for the Oklahoma Scholastic Media and spins a flaming hula hoop.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Racism: Be Part of the Problem, Or Be the Solution
Published: November 08, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: Society
Writer: Hilary Margaret
Hilary Margaret's BC Writer page
Hilary Margaret's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Hilary Margaret
Culture: Society
All Culture Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 9, 2007 @ 01:01AM — RJ [URL]

"Frasier behaves as if he holds no responsibility in eliminating such injustices, when in fact it is quite the opposite. As a member of the most privileged group in America (educated, wealthy, heterosexual, white, male), Frasier holds more responsibility than most."

Frasier is heterosexual???

But seriously, it's absurd to suggest that every white man in America needs to basically endorse the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton platform of "civil rights" or else he's no better than a NAZI.

#2 — November 9, 2007 @ 01:06AM — ostrova

Well said.

#3 — November 9, 2007 @ 09:50AM — REMF

"But seriously, it's absurd to suggest that every white man in America needs to basically endorse the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton platform of "civil rights" or else he's no better than a NAZI."

Strike a chord a little too close to home, did it?

#4 — November 10, 2007 @ 04:18AM — RJ [URL]

Still cyber-stalking me, REMF/MCH? After all these years?

Must be a cold (and lonely) winter up there in Helena for you, eh? ;-)

#5 — November 15, 2007 @ 07:39AM — Gary

Just a gentle reminder.Frasier is a fictional character.And a rather funny and warm one don't you think?

....and if Hitler Stalin Pol Pot et al had been more comfortable in the Lay Z Boy chair the world may be more comfortable with itself. Incidentally, it should be Lay Z person chair don't you think? Surely youre not suggesting that laziness is a male only preserve?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/70376)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments