<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on A College Football Playoff Proposal</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:03:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Matthew T. Sussman on A College Football Playoff Proposal</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/10/24/004447.php#comment-644119</link>
<description>I&#039;ve seen a lot of playoff proposals, not buying into any of them, but this one&#039;s got some new elements.

Some of them are curious, though. Having a BCS championship game in South Bend actually sounds cool, but in reality it&#039;ll be cold. To have a championship game outdoors in January? That might not be too fun to watch, and it might disadvantage, say, an Ohio State/Florida rematch, or a goofy Boston College/LSU game. 

Same with Temple/Philadelphia, but the MAC&#039;s championship game is played in Detroit&#039;s domed Ford Field, and the NCAA&#039;s home is Indianapolis. Hey, lookit that big plush RCA Dome they got there.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">644119@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:03:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>