OPINION

"Howl," Your Morals, and the FCC

Written by Terence Clarke
Published October 06, 2007

I wrote recently about the 1957 obscenity trial of Howl, And Other Poems by Allen Ginsberg. I felt a certain nostalgia writing the piece, because the trial took place fifty years ago when I was a kid, and the Beatnik writers, of whom Ginsberg became the most famous, seem so rarified to me now. It’s as though they had been filmed in black and white and the movies now jump and rattle as we watch them, the images scratched, browned, and antiquarian. Also, it gave me considerable pleasure to know that the government censorship that the “not guilty” judgment in that trial abolished had remained abolished ever since.

Yesterday, however, I learned that this is not true.

For the fiftieth anniversary of the trial, Pacifica Radio, the organization made up of the community-supported radio stations KPFA, KPFK, WBAI and others, considered the possibility of broadcasting a reading of the poem “Howl”. It happens that, besides being the object of a landmark First Amendment freedom of speech judgment in a court of law, “Howl” is one of the truly remarkable poems of the twentieth century. So a commemoration of it seemed altogether laudable. But because of feared Federal Communications Commission rules on what constitutes obscene or unacceptable speech on the public airwaves, Pacifica determined not to do the broadcast on its stations. They worry that if the FCC fines them for broadcasting unacceptable speech, they will have to involve themselves in a freedom of speech suit, the costs of which could bankrupt Pacifica and put the stations out of business.


 
Allen Ginsberg reading “Howl” in New York City in 1966.

So the problem is subtler now than it was in 1957. You don’t have to wait for actual censorship itself. The very fear that it will come causes organizations to muzzle themselves now. Perhaps you’d win in a trial. But you don’t test the waters willy-nilly because you’ll drown in the attorney fees that will result, no matter the judgment in court.

Luckily, though, we have the Internet. The rules regarding broadcasting do not pertain to webcasts, and Pacifica has posted a reading of “Howl” by Ginsberg himself on their site, as part of a longer program in which a very illuminating discussion of the history of the poem’s publication, the 1957 trial, and the importance of the poem as literature can also be found. (If you go to this link, it may be useful to you to have a copy of the text of "Howl" in front of you.) Besides the poem itself, the highlight of the program is a conversation with Lawrence Ferlinghetti, now eighty-eight years old, the San Francisco poet and bookseller who originally published “Howl.”

page 1 | 2
Terence Clarke is a San Francisco novelist, journalist, and film maker who writes about the arts.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
"Howl," Your Morals, and the FCC
Published: October 06, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Politics: Policy, Politics: Law and Rights, Politics: Government, Culture: Media, Culture: History, Culture: Celebrity, Culture: Arts, Books: Poetry
Writer: Terence Clarke
Terence Clarke's BC Writer page
Terence Clarke's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Terence Clarke
Politics: Policy
Politics: Law and Rights
Politics: Government
Culture: Media
Culture: History
Culture: Celebrity
Culture: Arts
Books: Poetry
All Culture Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 6, 2007 @ 13:10PM — Kevin Eagan [URL]

Excellent opinion piece on such an excellent poem, a poem that still rings true today. I'll let some of my fellow poetry students know about this recent development with the FCC, not surprising though.

#2 — October 6, 2007 @ 17:08PM — bliffle

My friends and I all read "Howl" in 1957 and knew immediately that it was about us and was a call to rebellion.

So we did.

Then the system seeks to drown everything under their bland blanket of manipulation. And mostly succeeds.

But "Howl" comes to life again. One wonders what these 2007 people will do with it.

#3 — October 6, 2007 @ 19:22PM — Jon Sobel [URL]

Great piece and worthy of note. I hadn't heard this news anywhere else. It's amazing that 50 years later this classic work can be censored. But when you think about it, passages of Shakespeare and the Bible have been excised in this nutty country too.

#4 — October 6, 2007 @ 19:54PM — The Haze

When fear of reprisal is the motivating factor to cower and do nothing,the resulting fate is well deserved.

#5 — October 6, 2007 @ 23:18PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

great piece.

it's really sad how the fcc has basically given free reign to do whatever they'd like.

#6 — October 9, 2007 @ 15:30PM — Baronius

It's an amazing poem, but it is appropriate for radio broadcast? Really? I get the symbolism of "Howl" being censored (although it's not actual censorship). But the poem isn't fit for all ages.

#7 — October 9, 2007 @ 15:44PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

for community radio? yeah, they should play it.

and no, it's not direct sensorship, but self-sensorship, since there appear to be no actual rules about these things.

#8 — October 9, 2007 @ 22:46PM — Jose [URL]

This is really good. Honestly, I'm happy someone wrote about Howl, because I've been trying to find out what the big deal was with this poem. Well written, too.

jose

#9 — November 3, 2007 @ 21:44PM — laura [URL]

About Howl and wbai. WBAI is bankrupt. Dan Siegel of the Pacifica National Board is corrupt. He has been temporarily placed on the national board for one month to sabotage the elections and allow the WBAI and Justice and Unity corruption to continue.

#10 — November 4, 2007 @ 14:02PM — bliffle

Of course it's quite easy to find Ginsberg reading "Howl" on youtube.

While there, the enthusiastic reader of poetry might find it interesting to taste other vigorous poems of the era by Kerouac, Corso, Kenneth Patchens "The Artists Duty".

Maybe I've found the obscenity in "Howl": they

"...who bared their brains to Heaven..."

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/69485)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments