<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Music DVD Review: &lt;em&gt;Marvin Gaye &amp;ndash; Greatest Hits Live In &#039;76&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:26:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Donald Gibson on Music DVD Review: &lt;em&gt;Marvin Gaye &amp;ndash; Greatest Hits Live In &#039;76&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/19/204417.php#comment-634033</link>
<description>I have a couple Marvin Gaye live albums (on CD) and most of them sound fairly poor (as far as sound quality). I&#039;ve never been able to figure out if the reasons stemmed from poor recordings or bad remastering.

Could a 5.1 treatment have actually improved this particular DVD if it was initially recorded with sub-par equipment?

Thanks for the comment and the compliment,

-Donald</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">634033@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:26:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Glen Boyd on Music DVD Review: &lt;em&gt;Marvin Gaye &amp;ndash; Greatest Hits Live In &#039;76&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/19/204417.php#comment-634029</link>
<description>It was a great performance I agree Donald, but I thought the sound was pretty muddy throughout and could have benefitted from the 5.1 treatment. Great review though.

-Glen</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">634029@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:14:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>