NEWS

David Gilmour Signed Lithograph Giveaway!

Written by Anna Creech
Published September 18, 2007

Blogcritics and Electric Artists are pleased to host a giveaway in conjunction with today's release of the new David Gilmour DVD, Remember That Night - Live from the Royal Albert Hall. One lucky winner will get a signed lithograph.

One critic described David Gilmour's On An Island Royal Albert Hall concert, as "a near-perfect gig, where the magic kept coming, as did the surprises." Now music fans, who may have missed Gilmour's 2006 tour, get a chance to share in that magic with the release of Remember That Night - Live At The Royal Albert Hall, a double DVD commemorating Gilmour's highly acclaimed SRO tour. Lasting more than five hours, Remember That Night - Live At The Royal Albert Hall includes Gilmour's rave-reviewed London concert — featuring special guest appearances from David Bowie, Robert Wyatt, David Crosby and Graham Nash — as well as over two and a half hours of extras, notably a revelatory fly-on-the-wall documentary following Gilmour and his band on tour. A 20-page booklet accompanies the DVD.

How to enter the David Gilmour Signed Lithograph giveaway:

  • Fill out the entry form. link removed - contest has ended
  • Only one entry per person.
  • Entries must be received by October 9, 2007.
  • Winner will be drawn after October 10, 2007.
  • Winner will be notified by e-mail and in the comments section below.

mug shotAnna Creech is a librarian and blogger who dreams of a day when she can improve the ratio of read-to-unread books in her house.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
David Gilmour Signed Lithograph Giveaway!
Published: September 18, 2007
Type: News
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: News, Music: Video, Video: Music, Video: News
Writer: Anna Creech
Anna Creech's BC Writer page
Anna Creech's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Anna Creech
Music: News
Music: Video
Video: Music
Video: News
All Music Articles
Anna Creech's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 18, 2007 @ 14:48PM — Eva Pepitone

My mind cannot be spoken

#2 — September 19, 2007 @ 07:23AM — David

Thanks from a DG fan.

#3 — September 19, 2007 @ 09:28AM — Karima

Glad for the giveaway. I flew over the pond to attend DG's Royal Albert Hall gig and it was indeed a magical night.

#4 — September 19, 2007 @ 19:19PM — Gary Arseneau [URL]

Dear Ms. Creech:

The so-called David Gilmour lithographs, in your article, are non-disclosed reproductions being misrepresented, with or without intent, to help promote his upcoming DVD/concert.

Lithographs are an original labor intensive creative medium where an artist draws on a stone, plate or mylar. The image drawn by the artist is the tool. That tool is printed by the artist resulting in multiple original works of visual art ie. lithographs.

This is confirmed by U.S. Customs regulations Informed Compliance publication August 2004, which states a lithograph "must be wholly executed by hand by the artist" and "exclude all mechanical and photomechanical processes."

Now compare that fact to David Gilmour's website where his bio makes absolutely no mention of his knowledge or participation in the original creative medium of lithography.

Unfortunately, this is another example of abusing terminology for profit.

This abuse is confirmed on David Gilmour's website. In part, it states: "Something Good On TV Shock - 'David Gilmour In Concert' On Air .... which features several Ross Halfin lithographs, photos from the pre-tour sessions at."

Remember, lithographs are not photographs.

In closing, one could argue David Gilmour and others are unaware of the difference between a reproduction and a lithograph but that would be an explanation but not an excuse.

I hope you might consider publishing this post for full and honest disclosure.

Gary Arseneau
artist, creator of original lithographs, scholar & author

#5 — September 19, 2007 @ 20:06PM — Anna Creech [URL]

Mr. Arseneau,

I do not like the accusatory and haughty tone of your message, but I will try to not take it personally since you do not know me and I do not know you.

The signed lithograph in question is being provided by the company that is promoting the release of the DVD. I do not have the item in my possession, so I cannot personally verify if it is a lithograph or simply a photographic reproduction. The description was provided to me by the promotions company, and I must take their word for it.

#6 — September 20, 2007 @ 01:08AM — Gary Arseneau [URL]

Dear Ms. Creech:

Respectfully, I thank you for your reply.

If you want confirmation that the so-called "lithograph" being offered is a non-disclosed reproduction just ask the promotional company the following questions: "Is it from an original?"

If they state -yes-, that is a confirmation it's a reproduction and not a lithograph.

Remember, lithographs are original works of visual art and would -never- be trivialized as a copy of anything.

If they state: -don't know-, that is confirmation they don't know what they are promoting.

That response would not give one any confidence that they know what they are doing.

Once again, respectfully, these kind of deceptive promotions by many in the music industry of reproductions as lithgraphs for monetary considerations are too numerous to count.

So, please followup and ask and/or email those questions enclosed to the promotional company who gave you that description.

Their answers might make you reconsider your promotional position for this so-called lithograph.

Any questions or comments, please email.

I look forward to your reply

Sincerely,

Gary Arseneau
artist, creator of original lithographs, scholar & author

#7 — September 20, 2007 @ 21:39PM — steve the printer

Dear Gary the Arteest,

Apparently you never heard the term OFFSET LITHOGRAPHY, which, in common language, people call PRINTED LITHOGRAPHS.

Duh, this Gilmore thing is a poster not a fine work of art. Get a clue.

If you have to explain it, it aint art.

Frank Zappa said so.

Steve
critic of boneheads, phi kappa phi, plus many more REAL credentials that i dont need to pompously list.

#8 — September 21, 2007 @ 10:28AM — Gary Arseneau

Respectfully, you have a common misconception that even I at one time had. The following will document the clear difference between an offset lithograph and and reproduction

An offset lithograph is an original work of visual where the artist draws on a plate and that plate is printed, with their approval, on an offset lithograpic press. The result being original artist created offset lithographs.

A reproduction of a pre-existing work of visual art, such as a painting, reproduced on an offset lithographic press is a reproduction.

An offset lithograpic press is a tool. What is printed or reproduced with that offset lithographic press determines what it is.

That conclusion is once again supported by U.S. Customs regulations, U.S. Copyright Law, statutory law and independent documented definitions.

Gary Arseneau
garyarseneau.blogspot.com

#9 — October 5, 2007 @ 13:18PM — JONI CHADWELL

this is a really cool prize!

#10 — October 10, 2007 @ 01:48AM — Anna Creech [URL]

Congratulations to William W. (Maryland)!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/68802)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments