REVIEW

DVD Review: Death Proof

Written by Daniel J. Stasiewski
Published September 18, 2007

It seems that Quentin Tarantino finally missed with Death Proof. The prolific writer/director, whose nearly infallible career made some believe Christ had returned, stepped out of bounds with his half of Grindhouse, now a standalone film thanks to a DVD director's cut release.

Of course there are some who still believe that his slasher/revenge film is just as great, maybe even greater, than his other work. To them I say, if Death Proof is a masterpiece, then Tarantino made one of the most unwatchable masterpieces in cinematic history.

The film is split into two parts with the first following crazed killer Stuntman Mike (Kurt Russell) as he stalks a group of unsuspecting ladies in Austin, Texas. How does Stuntman Mike attack his victims? With his reinforced, “death proof” stunt car. While Stuntman Mike succeeds with in taking out the first group of girls, that other clique in the second half (you know, the half without a grainy filter) doesn't cave so easily. He tries to run them off the road, and they try to run him off right back. Only they have guns... and a lead pipe.

Yes, guns and a lead pipe and a fast car. You can tell Death Proof wasn't an attempt to make a great film. Worse, the storylines aren't even elevated by the fact that Tarantino is intentionally making a bad movie; they are just bad.

You may try to put Death Proof on the same level as the genre pictures that Tarantino has made in the past, but it's hard to see anything resembling the effortless, avant garde masterpieces that he delivered consistently for years. The jump cuts designed to mimic a lost reel or missing frames don't seem revolutionary, instead adding an artificial look to Tarantino's weakest big budget attempt at low budget filmmaking.

Certain bad shots in the slasher half of the film seem do have an inspired quality about them, but Tarantino's much beloved dialogue gets in the way of our ability to focus on the little successes. Still, the first half's dialogue is better than the taxing chit chat in the second part of the film. The latter half is an hour of excruciating, uninteresting personal anecdotes without the coolness we've come to expect.

Yes, I did just use the word coolness, because if we can call Tarantino one thing, it's cool. He's earned a reputation for being hip among the critics and cinematic elitists. But among his circle of friends, Robert Rodriguez, Eli Roth and others, maybe he wasn't cool enough. His movies weren't the same as theirs. They were just too damn good. If nothing else, Death Proof can be looked at as a reason not to cave into peer pressure. Because, just as I said the first time I reviewed Grindhouse, if you set out to make a bad movie, that's exactly what you are going to make.

Special Feature that aren't worth writing home about but are listed nonetheless:

  • Finding Quentin’s Gals
  • The Guys Of Death Proof
  • Kurt Russell As Stuntman Mike
  • Introducing Zoe Bell
  • Quentin’s Greatest Collaborator: Editor Sally Menke
  • Double Dare Trailer
  • International Poster Gallery

Daniel J. Stasiewski resides in Cleveland where he is the webmaster and editor of The Film Chair. He has an unhealthy obsession with movies and popular culture, for which his therapist suggested joining Blogcritics.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
DVD Review: Death Proof
Published: September 18, 2007
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Art House, Video: Cult
Writer: Daniel J. Stasiewski
Daniel J. Stasiewski's BC Writer page
Daniel J. Stasiewski's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Daniel J. Stasiewski
Video: Action
Video: Art House
Video: Cult
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 18, 2007 @ 12:31PM — Jesse

What are the chances of both movies coming out later in a "Special Edition" DVD set... TOGETHER? It pisses me off honestly that they are broken up into two movies and I'd much rather wait until they are both packaged together if that is in the foreseeable future...

#2 — September 18, 2007 @ 15:27PM — brad schader

I am not sure it will although the desire for money could change anything. I read somewhere that they thought about a one set release, but changed their minds to make the "Grindhouse" thing a theater experiance.

#3 — September 18, 2007 @ 17:50PM — El Bicho [URL]

"It seems that Quentin Tarantino finally missed with Death Proof."

Finally? Did you not see his segment in "Four Rooms"?

#4 — September 21, 2007 @ 09:57AM — Robin

I've just DP and wow - how taxing. During the second round of 40 minute (yes... 40 minute) pointless chit-chat, i went out for a hotdog, coffe and ciggy. Returned to more pointless chit chat.

The quality of the film, cuts, focuses, tracking shots etc gave the impression of a lot of money being thrown about to create the effect of a low budget film; and what were those end credits about?

Maybe I didn't get it - his worst effort to date. One final word to the man himself... stay out of appearing in your own films - you can't act and it ruins the illusion of a story unfolding in front of you. Actually I take that comment back, there was no story!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/68777)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments