<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:57:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by daryl d on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-633044</link>
<description>Ray,

I completely agree with you about this. I think if nothing is actually wrong with the product, a ten percent restocking fee is reasonable. But it&#039;s places like Circuit City or Best Buy that make me sick because they charge a 15 percent restocking fee-way too much! Fry&#039;s Electronics doesn&#039;t charge any restocking fee, but then they turn around and sell products that were used and you can tell. 

I decided to keep the Ipod Touch. As disappointed as I am with it (because I had the Iphone for awhile), it is still very lightweight and the interface, as I mentioned, is great. I&#039;m not as angry about this as I was when I wrote the article I guess. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">633044@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:57:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ThomasE1ite on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632830</link>
<description>Yeah, I bought a bicycle once and it was alot of money, $150 dollars at target! I&#039;m glad I had the option to return it, although I&#039;m really lazy so i just convinced myself it was good enough.....uhm i forgot what my point was.....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632830@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:13:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Beaumont on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632677</link>
<description>The only way to find out what you really like is to have it in hand at home to use and play with. It&#039;s a lot of money to spend on something that you will ultimately not be happy with. Repacking fees are a crock used to try and scare people to keep something they don&#039;t want for fear of losing money. 

If it comes down to it, you can always return it as defective, no stocking fees then.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632677@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:54:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ray Ellis on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632560</link>
<description>&quot;I also have the Archos 605 wifi. Either this or the Ipod will be returned because I can&#039;t afford to keep both.&quot;

This is precisely why electronics retailers have had to resort to charging repacking fees. Some consumers seem to think it&#039;s okay to &quot;rent&quot; a product.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632560@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:36:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Raoul on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632555</link>
<description>I can&#039;t say I&#039;m surprised. The price drop for the iPhone was large, and Jobs likes to hold on to big profit margins. He had to make the money somewhere else. It&#039;s possible that cheaper components are used in the iPod Touch at the expense of screen quality. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632555@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:04:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Stewart on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632541</link>
<description>&quot;People who still pay for music&quot;?

Are you admitting to copyright infringement in public?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632541@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:30:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tan The Man on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632525</link>
<description>Dead pixels suck.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632525@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 02:35:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by daryl d on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632503</link>
<description>Ok, so I noticed some dead pixels on my Ipod Touch screen and even though most people wouldn&#039;t mind the little dots of light on the screen, it made me sick. So, after causing a scene at the Apple Store, the manager agreed to exchange it. The new one I received has no dead pixels and I have to admit, the screen looks a little better. It&#039;s a little more crisp. It&#039;s still a disappointment when put next to the Iphone. However, for someone who has not seen the Iphone screen - well, they may be impressed. 

I also have the Archos 605 wifi. Either this or the Ipod will be returned because I can&#039;t afford to keep both. The Archos has a beautiful screen and a lot of cool features, including being able to stream video from a network. But it just doesn&#039;t have the &quot;cool&quot; interface the Ipod has. I have to give it to Apple for the Ipod Touch interface, which is really slick.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632503@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:16:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Billy Bob on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632476</link>
<description>What&#039;s an ipod?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632476@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:55:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ray Ellis on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632463</link>
<description>Could be the reviewer is a salesperson&#039;s nightmare--one of those people who buys the latest and greatest with every intention of returning it. The customer is not always right.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632463@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:15:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by CG on Tech Review: iPod Touch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/09/15/100816.php#comment-632456</link>
<description>I just got an 8gb Touch and I think it looks great.  But yeah, maybe I&#039;m not as &quot;tech-savvy&quot; as some you other guys.  If you don&#039;t like it, take it back, that way there will be 16gb available when I go to the apple store.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">632456@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:02:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>