OPINION

Has Enough Time Passed To Start Forgetting 9/11?

Written by Victor Lana
Published September 10, 2007

The past is not dead. It's not even past.
-William Faulkner

Has enough time passed to start forgetting 9/11? This is a disturbing question for those family members, coworkers, and friends who lost someone on September 11, 2001 in the terrorist attacks. Still, in a most despicably callous way, it continues to be asked by some people who want to "move on."

Perhaps their motives are not as cruel as they seem, but they should understand that moving on is just not possible for some. People who disrespectfully tell us to "move on" have little or no concept of the nature of each person's individual type of mourning, and those whom the victims (of the worst attack on our homeland in United States history) left behind surely deserve something better than this.

This year the ceremony here in New York City has been "scaled back" considerably. New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his administration have seen fit not to hold the Commemoration Ceremony at Ground Zero (the former site of The World Trade Center destroyed in the attacks) but at nearby Zuccotti Park (on Liberty Street between Broadway and Church Street). Yes, the names of the victims will be read as in the past, but it seems extraordinarily cold-hearted to move the ceremony away from the scene of the attacks.

The reason for this situation is all the activity happening at Ground Zero. If someone has never visited the city since the attacks, he or she would be amazed by the sounds and sights to be encountered there now. The pit or hole that once seemed a wasteland after the attacks has been transformed by workers, machinery, and the building materials necessary to create and recreate the space.

While this is commendable and truly in keeping with a desire to show the world that nothing keeps New Yorkers down, it seems more than ridiculous that all this activity cannot be stopped for one day to mark the sanctity of the ground where so many people died.

The question all along has been why Bloomberg and company want to prevent the ceremony from happening at Ground Zero. Does the debate center on the safety of those participating in the ceremony who could be perceived to be in danger from the construction process happening at the site? If that is the case, I can understand Bloomberg's thinking, but it is difficult to believe that one area on the 16-acre site could not be secured for the purpose of marking this anniversary, especially with the day falling ominously on a Tuesday as it did the day the attacks took place.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Victor Lana has published numerous stories and articles in literary magazines and online, including his favorite haunt here at Blogcritics. His novels A Death in Prague (2002) and Move (2003) and his new book The Savage Quiet September Sun: A Collection of 9/11 Stories are available at online bookstores.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Has Enough Time Passed To Start Forgetting 9/11?
Published: September 10, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: History, Culture: Personal History, Culture: Society
Writer: Victor Lana
Victor Lana's BC Writer page
Victor Lana's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Victor Lana
Culture: History
Culture: Personal History
Culture: Society
All Culture Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 10, 2007 @ 13:52PM — Michael J. West [URL]

I don't think we should "forget" or "move on" from 9/11...although I do wonder why it gets "the most respectful, meaningful, and public ceremony every year" for six years now, but the anniversary of Hurricane Katrina - by far a larger, more deadly, more damaging, and more expensive catastrophe - barely sort of semi-registers on the American consciousness a mere two years after the event.

#2 — September 10, 2007 @ 21:02PM — Alessandro

MJW, true - but 9/11 was an act of terror and not a freak of nature. Dealing with nature is "easier" (or at the least simpler to comprehend) than facing the depraved senselessness of murderers.

Victor, don't mean to nitpick but we could also recall the 260 (?) marines killed in Lebanon in the early eighties (1983 was it?)

Great piece. I simply love New York City. Was just there in March to attend my cousin's wedding in Brooklyn - he was in Building Seven on 9/11. My wife and I happened to be flicking channels last night and happened upon the horrific images of that day. We were numb - six years later...and all the way up here in Montreal.

#3 — September 10, 2007 @ 22:48PM — Victor Lana

I wrote an article about Katrina awhile back here on BC. It affected me too as it has many others. I am just focused on 9/11 right now (and also because it affected my family). All disasters (whether man-made or natural) are so large in scope that they demand recognition as do their victims and survivors.

#4 — September 10, 2007 @ 23:58PM — STM

Why would anyone in America even want to start forgetting 9/11?? It's too bizarre a notion to accept that anyone would even contemplate such a thing ...

Next time someone tells you the war on terror isn't real (as opposed to the baloney war in Iraq, which really has nothing to do with it), take another look at the tapes of jets flying into skyscrapers and remember how you felt that day.

#5 — September 11, 2007 @ 01:53AM — Ruvy in Jerusalem

There is a big difference between forgetting and moving on.

But in either event, the problem that this event put on the map for Americans so that it finally now registers in their thick self-absorbed heads - Wahhabi terror spread through the Saudi-funded madrassas throughout the world - has scarcely been dealt with.

There is no reason to either move on or forget. And anybody who thinks the contrary is a fool who needs to be punished with more deaths from Wahhabi terror to learn.

#6 — September 11, 2007 @ 03:12AM — Ruvy in Jerusalem

Stan,

The war on terror is not real.

"Next time someone tells you the war on terror isn't real (as opposed to the baloney war in Iraq, which really has nothing to do with it), take another look at the tapes of jets flying into skyscrapers and remember how you felt that day."

The "war on terror" is all bullshit. The terror war on us is, by contrast, is very real. And, like you, I've seen far more than merely the big Arab ceegar sticking out of the doomed World Trade Center. Seeing that on CNN in a pizza parlor in Jerusalem was my 50th birthday "present."

When the Americans nuke Riyadh and Teheran, then I'll know that the war on terror is real. Till then, the US government is just blowing smoke up everybody's ass...

#7 — September 11, 2007 @ 06:08AM — Christopher Rose [URL]

I've always thought this "blowing smoke up your ass" remark to be odd. Has anyone ever had it done to them? What does it feel like? What kind of smoke? It seems a somewhat strange and probably unpleasant experience to my way of thinking but the way it is used seems to imply a sedative.

Inquiring minds want to know...

#8 — September 11, 2007 @ 06:40AM — Victor Lana [URL]

While some of these comments are very "colorful" to say the least, I think we're getting away from the issue here. 2,973 Americans died on 9/11/2001, and this is something that should always be marked as a solemn anniversary.

#9 — September 11, 2007 @ 07:04AM — bliffle

Maudlin.

#10 — September 11, 2007 @ 08:42AM — Nancy

Sorry, but while I do sympathize with the survivors & those who lost loved ones, they can't expect the universe to go on mourning & memorializing with them forever. If I died today, my friends would weep for a few days, but then I hope they'd go on. Remember me, yes, but stop everything to hold a big memorial shebang? No.

IMO this business of making a national day of grief out of every situation is getting on the overkill side. Major memorials for the victims of 9/11, Va Tech, this tragedy, that tragedy .... Come on, people; so many things happen all over the place, so often, to so many, we're going to be spending all our time memorializing "victims" of so-called "tragedies".

We shouldn't forget 9/11, those who died, or more importantly, those who planned & perpetuated this. So why is the ringleader still with us after all this time, billions of dollars, & 5,000+ US lives wasted in Afghanistan & Iraq)? It seems to me the most fitting memorial to the 9/11 people, victims & survivors both, would be for BushCo to honor their pledge to capture or kill this bastard, instead of pursuing bogus wars in order to control oil - or bring "freedom" & "democracy" to people who don't want it & can't handle it. Now THAT would be a memorial worth observing.

In any event, despite Ruvy's opinion, I think it is time to move on, & stop memorializing & expecting the world to stop every time something happens.

#11 — September 11, 2007 @ 09:18AM — Andy Marsh [URL]

If you haven't stood at the bottom and looked up and rode the elevator to the top and looked out, you can't comprehend. If you haven't stood outside at 8 in the morning and seen the masses of people that headed into those buildings...if you didn't have friends in those buildings, you can't comprehend the loss that some people feel.

Great article Victor. Thank you.

#12 — September 11, 2007 @ 09:44AM — Catey

something touched me deep inside, the day the music died... "American Pie"

#13 — September 11, 2007 @ 10:02AM — daryl d

More of a tragedy is the fact that our administration used the death of these people to wage an unjust war and mame innocent Iraquis and convince people that the people in Iraq that are fighting against the USA invasion should somehow be called "insurgents."

People die everyday and it's a sad thing. But constantly having a memorial for the 911 victims reeks of propaganda from our government.

#14 — September 11, 2007 @ 10:23AM — Catey

If you wish to think of Iraq and George Bush and Republicans every time 9/11 comes around, thats your choice. I see and remember an event that happened all in and of itself.

#15 — September 11, 2007 @ 10:41AM — Ray Ellis [URL]

#13.I won't even bother quoting you. But I will tell you that remembering the victims of 9/11 has NOTHING to do with politics. This is not the forum for another of your self-made controversies.

#16 — September 11, 2007 @ 10:48AM — daryl d

Yes, but it's hard NOT to forget that the tragic loss of these people was used to take away more tragic lives.

It's really hard to see if these "911 Victim" Tributes are really sincere or not.

For the people who lost family members that day, the tributes are obviously sincere. But to hear George W. Bush and Rudi Guilliani, the so-called "911 Hero," Ugggggg.....

#17 — September 11, 2007 @ 10:53AM — Ruvy in Jerusalem

My point, dear Nancy, is less related to whether one should move on from a tragedy, than to whether, if that tragedy presents a real problem, CAN one realistically "move on" if the problem is still in the in-box.

Given that the problem in most assuredly yet in the in-box, and yet undealt with in any realistic way, one CANNOT move on.

Individuals, of course, do move on in their own lives; they have to. A widow cannot be expected to wear black forever.

But in this instance, the event that caused the widowhood remains undealt with, and the individuals who are truly responsible for the widowhood are yet not only at large, but enjoying the good life, often with the help of the United States government.

One can argue one way or another if the American government was involved somehow in the bringing down of the Twin Towers six years ago today. But one cannot argue that the United States government has truly attempted to stem Wahhabi terror on her soil, or anywhere else in the world.

IT HAS NOT.

For this reason, there is yet a gaping, raw wound in America that must be healed with action to bring the criminals to justice. Until this does occur, America will be unable to move on.

#18 — September 11, 2007 @ 11:13AM — Victor Lana

The "real" 9/11 heroes were those firefighters, police officers, EMTs, and others who went in those burning buildings while everyone was running out. These are the 9/11 heroes. All those who died in the towers, in DC, and in PA are the innocent victims of madmen, of an evil as incomprehensible as the Holocaust.

Today we honor these people. Discussions about anything else seem disrespectful to say the least. "War on terror" and other topics should be left to other forums. This space is about honoring those who died. Please understand that.

#19 — September 11, 2007 @ 11:23AM — Ray Ellis [URL]

Thank you, Victor.

#20 — September 11, 2007 @ 11:26AM — Andy Marsh [URL]

Yeah! What Victor said!

#21 — September 11, 2007 @ 12:05PM — Nancy

I can't even comprehend at this time how the guys in NYC had the courage to go in - & die - in a situation that they (I'm quite sure, I've discussed this with other volunteers, including some of our guys who went up there afterwards to help search for bodies) KNEW was probably going to be dangerous for them at best, & most likely terminal. I can't fathom that they went in anyway. I gotta admit, had I been a NY fire/rescue volunteer, I wouldn't - couldn't - have made myself go in. So they're a helluva lot better than I ever will be. Course, with my leg as it is now, that's not a question anymore.

Ruvy, the problem will NEVER be addressed, because those that the very peak of power in US government are those who are most hand-in-glove with those who fostered & subsidized the attackers, as are far too many in congress. We can't even get congress to impeach Bush & Cheney, much less accuse them of complicity with the Saudis, so it will remain an open wound forever, IMO, as long as there's money to be made by the very rich families who control politics here in the US & don't care that 3000+ people died because of their greed, not counting the 3500+ soldiers in Iraq to date.

#22 — September 11, 2007 @ 12:23PM — Andy Marsh [URL]

Nancy - Honestly, talking to firemen from up there, NY and Newark across the river, I don't believe they thought the buildings were gonna come down. They had tried to bring them down before without success.

I bet that most people up there thought like I did, that the towers were indestructable! I had been taught years earlier that they were designed to take the impact of a commercial jet airliner...

#23 — September 11, 2007 @ 12:29PM — Nancy

I dunno...some of our guys went up there, as I said, & spent a good deal of time talking to the NY people. At the time a lot of these firefighters etc. went in, the buildings were already unstable in the extreme, altho they weren't already collapsing...but the fire/smoke situation was such that death was a heavy constant regardless, even w/PBI gear & SCBA units. And they went in anyway.

Don't get me wrong: just seeing photos of any of that day reduces me to tears of horror & rage, but I do think that we've got to stop building things into national days of mourning every time something happens, and/or relatives demand recognition (& increasingly, remuneration!) for their losses. We ALL lose loved ones, some more tragically than others, but that doesn't mean the whole world has to stop & mourn with us, or worse, perpetuate it.

#24 — September 11, 2007 @ 12:47PM — handyguy [URL]

"Discussions about anything else seem disrespectful to say the least."

I feel sure that there were plenty among those killed on 9/11 who would disagree with this self-righteous piety, and certainly a number of people among the grieving families too.

Especially on a web site like this one, telling people how to react and what to say is offensive.

It's impossible for many of us to think about this day and not consider the even worse tragedies that have followed - many as a result of misguided idealism, or worse, the cynical use of grief and anger to promote immoral policies.

And when we do air these genuine feelings, this is true respect, not disrespect.

#25 — September 11, 2007 @ 13:54PM — Victor Lana

Handy, I'm not telling anyone how to react. That's up to them, but I think that to spoil for a fight here is wrong and mean-spirited. This is about honoring the lost, not debating other items. That is what I meant.

Please feel free to spew all the hatred you want here, but I'm skipping over it.

#26 — September 11, 2007 @ 14:02PM — handyguy [URL]

I did not and do not 'spew hatred,' here or elsewhere. (Although in your own way, you just did.)

I do think there are ways of 'honoring the dead' that do not involve mouthing Hallmark-style cliches. And those other ways are equally valid and equally respectful.

#27 — September 11, 2007 @ 14:27PM — daryl d

handguy, you get the award for post of the day. Thank you and there are many who agree with us.

#28 — September 11, 2007 @ 16:24PM — Victor Lana

Andy, I think you're right for the most part. Those guys went in thinking it was like 1993. So were the people who were trapped inside and waving white cloths out the window (just like in 1993). By the time they knew it was going to come down it was too late, and the walkie-talkies weren't working either.

All I know is the New York's Bravest earned their title that day.

#29 — September 11, 2007 @ 17:10PM — bliffle

Since the sterling BC political staff has apparently imposed a blackout on discussions of the Petraeus/Crocker head-to-head, blowhard-to-blowhard, session in congress, let me summarize:

MORE TUNNEL, NO LIGHT.

There, paste that in your neocon show.

#30 — September 11, 2007 @ 18:52PM — El Bicho [URL]

Biffle, if there was a blackout, then how did your comment get through? I can publish your article on the subject if you let me know the title.

#31 — September 11, 2007 @ 19:08PM — Victor Lana

If anyone reading this actually watched the ceremony today, I would hope that affected him or her in some meaningful way.

I wish the mayors and politicans would be somewhere else. This has nothing to do with politics (yes it does unfortunately but it should not) and everything to do with those who died and those who remain and mourn.

It is less a "Hallmark" moment and more a moment to be marked as hallowed.

#32 — September 12, 2007 @ 01:38AM — klondikekitty

The events of 9/11 were by far some of the most senseless,horrific and unbelievable acts of complete terroristic violence I have ever witnessed in my life. The fact that the current Bush Administration has used those events to advance its own agenda of death in Iraq only adds to the unspeakable cruelty by those who perpetrated the deaths of so many innocent Americans on that day.
Although I live in the Midwest and have no relatives or even friends who were killed on 9/11, my heart goes out to the familes of those who died, who can NEVER forget -- May God grant you His endless comfort and love to carry you through each anniversary of 9/11, as you struggle with the rest of us to understand how such hatred could be aimed at so many who had little or nothing to do with the foreign policies that fed and nurtured that hatred into attacking America. I pray that the same God who comforts you all will bring swift and certain justice to those responsible for such evil.

#33 — September 12, 2007 @ 05:33AM — Christopher Rose [URL]

Bliffle, re your #29, why do you say that? To the best of my knowledge the "BC political staff" couldn't impose a blackout on a 5 watt bulb and if that's not right I want to know about it!

#34 — September 12, 2007 @ 10:42AM — Andy Marsh [URL]

Victor - I read somewhere that they actually set up the command center that day IN the world trade center...my bro-in-law, who's a Newark FF said there was no upper echelon left in NYC that day to call for help. I remember being told as a kid that they wer egonna be there forever...the Ronzoni boxes!

I've also met the guys at House 10 and talked to them some. Incredible guys I tell ya...just incredible!

#35 — September 12, 2007 @ 13:15PM — Michael J. West [URL]

It is less a "Hallmark" moment and more a moment to be marked as hallowed.

THE SECRET TO CONSECRATING SEPTEMBER 11:

Shut the Hell up about it for the other 364 days of the year.

I susepct that the reason some people want to forget 9/11, or move on from it, is that they've been beat over the head with it several dozen times too many.

Well-intentioned people have mentioned 9/11 constantly, beginning on 9/12. It was necessary for a while, to make sense of what happened and to figure out what to do next.

But there comes a time in which every new utterance of the term "9/11" serves to desensitize people - to cheapen the meaning and ramifications of 9/11. Mention it every day, all the time, and how can you be surprised when people stop thinking of it as extraordinary?

Thus I propose a strict limitation on talking about 9/11 from today, September 13, until next September 8. Maybe that way, when the next anniversary rolls around, people won't be as sick to death of hearing about 9/11 as I'm guessing they were this anniversary.

#36 — September 12, 2007 @ 18:48PM — Victor Lana

Michael, I can understand your feelings, but please try to understand mine (and many others too). We lost someone, and in that there is not just one day a year to deal with, but 364 other ones. It's omnipresent and does not ease up as years pass. I wish mourning were that simple.

#37 — September 13, 2007 @ 08:55AM — Michael J. West [URL]

I understand your feelings too, Victor. But I do wish to reiterate: rehashing and revisiting 9/11 ad infinitem, 365 days a year, is PRECISELY what makes other people not want to hear about, talk about, or think about it anymore, even on its anniversary.

And I speak as someone who watched the plane go into the Pentagon.

Thus if someone who wants to "move on" seems to you to be "despicably callous" - well, "callous" is a fitting word: it means "hardened and desensitized as a result of prolonged exposure."

I don't mean this to sound as nasty as it does (genuinely, I don't), but those who rehash and revisit 9/11 ad infinitem, 365 days a year, are the "prolonged exposure." Does this include you? If so, and if people have become callous about 9/11, it is you who have helped to make them so.

#38 — September 13, 2007 @ 10:01AM — Catey

I have never heard it rehashed and spoken of like you state it Michael. Im my everyday life I have never experienced this mind boggling, all out assault of speaking about 9/11 that your talking about.Maybe you need to take a break from this site and other sources that do talk about it and rehash it 365.Change the channel.Watch cartoons :)

#39 — September 13, 2007 @ 11:20AM — Michael J. West [URL]

I'm not talking about a mind-boggling, all-out assault, Catey. I'm talking about every time someone says "Have you forgotten what happened on 9/11?" or "9/11 changed everything" or told the story of where you were on 9/11.

You don't have to rant and rave about it: After a while, every time you talk about it at all, it contributes to desensitizing people.

#40 — September 13, 2007 @ 11:57AM — Nancy

Mike, amen to that. I hear it even more than you do, since I'm with a fire/rescue dept - & we were there at the Pentagon w/in the hour of the plane striking. So I'm aware firsthand of the horror, etc. BUT - since that day, I hear nothing but 9/11-9/11-9/11 - USUALLY by those who want to exploit it, like the MSM, who gabble about it incessently, & the filthy pols, who use it to try to advance their own selfish interests. I DO wish someone would hold a major memorial on 9/11 - & pointedly DISinvite the politicians & attention-grabbers. Something like: '...no elected or political personalities need apply....'

Later we sent a couple of our vehicles up to NYC to help with the searches. I didn't go, but that was pretty rending for those that did. I certainly heard all about it in detail, as well as saw a lot of personal & upclose photos our guys took while there. Awful. And NOT to be endlessly hashed over & USED by opportunists, dammit.

#41 — September 13, 2007 @ 16:37PM — Victor Lana

I do agree with you Nancy about people who shouldn't be there (which includes ALL politicians). This is a solemn event, and during such somber moments we don't to see these poeple who are trying to somehow benefit from such tragedy.

#42 — September 14, 2007 @ 08:49AM — Michael J. West [URL]

I know, I know how insensitive I've sounded on this thread. Especially insensitive in that I'm talking this way to you, Victor, who've proven yourself time and again to be a thoughtful and sensitive writer.

It's just that I need, desperately, to live in a world where EVERYTHING is not a reminder of 9/11. Constantly I'm exposed to images of the Towers, or descriptions of it, or those goddamned morons who insist that it was controlled demolition. 9/11 is not something that I can forget or move on from. Because 9/11 is EVERYWHERE.

I can't spend every day for the rest of my life re-living that event.

I think it would be very appropriate to spend every September 11 thinking about that day. Discussing it. Remembering it and paying tribute to the lives lost because of it.

But I don't think we can reasonably do that if we're expected to do it every other day of the year, too. Just like anything else, "9/11" becomes meaningless if it's repeated too often. It doesn't matter by whom - politicians, journalists, plumbers, or college students. Politicians just happen to be the worst offenders.

#43 — September 14, 2007 @ 19:51PM — Victor Lana

Michael, I think everyone has to do what he or she needs to do to get healthy. Sometimes it involves going up to Vermont and living in the country, or it could be climbing a mountain or deep sea diving.

I chose to write a book about 9/11. I lived it everyday for three years, but the writing helped. Now, I still live it and think it and feel it each day, but that doesn't mean I'm talking about it 24/7.

I guess each of us will find the way to get to a place where that gaping hole in lower Manhattan doesn't eat our hearts away, but it hasn't been easy.

#44 — September 15, 2007 @ 00:50AM — Michael J. West [URL]

And I apologize, Victor, if I came across like a jerk. I certainly feel like one when I reread those comments.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/68470)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments