The Invisible Hipster
Published August 20, 2007
Hence my theory arose: there's no such thing as a "hipster." The hipster is an assemblage of half-hearted characterizations, designed as a sort of cultural "folk devil." Few people share all these characteristics, and there's no real sense of scope to the label. I wouldn't even have a problem with this, but none of us — normal people, or members of the vehemently anti-hipster crowd — have a problem with any of these characteristics taken individually. Drink PBR? What's the problem? Listen to indie rock, talk about the politics of the bands? You may be a music snob, but who cares? Live in Williamsburg? Sure, it's a growing neighborhood. If you're a friend of mine, you can fit three, four, five of these characteristics and not be a hipster, cause it's all in good faith. But if I don't like you, and you exhibit even ONE of these qualifications, you're a damn hipster. I hate you people.
This "cultural folk devil" concept (which I am currently coining as a variation of the classic "folk devil") is actually fairly common. There are always large groups who have been stigmatized and blamed for culture's problems, from Jews to Teenagers to Fags. These days, this kind of stigmatization has gone from "evil" to "annoying"; we tend to label concepts as stupid, bothersome, played-out, and obnoxious. Admittedly, it's a step up, but it's still a bad social habit. Some of the cultural folk devils stigmatized in recent times have been "sXe (straight-edge)," "emo," "postmodernism," and "chavs." It's up for debate whether each of these deserves its widespread ire. However, all of these ideas and subcultures have at least existed on some level.
I repeat: the hipster doesn't exist. It's an imaginary scapegoat, a convenient target for our disapproval and ridicule. I know this because I've looked for a definition that was worthy of my own distrust, and I've found nothing of the kind. It's sort of a cultural stereotype, so my main avenue has been asking friends, but none of them seemed to have a good definition for me. In fact, many of those who gave angry-but-vague definitions were people who themselves fit a number of commonly-cited characteristics. Finally, looking for something comprehensive, if not exactly "precise," I consulted Wikipedia. This is really the best function for Wikipedia to fulfill — even if it's rarely well-written or accurate, it's at least a good representation of generally-held cultural beliefs on certain topics.
- The Invisible Hipster
- Published: August 20, 2007
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: Society, Culture: Media, Culture: Fashion and Beauty
- Writer: Jesse Miksic
- Jesse Miksic's BC Writer page
- Jesse Miksic's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Thanks for the comment, EB.
I'm sort of playing the devil's advocate, yes... but the basic idea here is still sound, at least according to my logic. "Hipster" is a label that gets thrown around a lot, but it's almost never applied to a particular person, and when it is, it's always someone we don't know that well. "The hipster" is like "the other."
I realized, after I started writing this, that if anything, it's a response to a common brand of cultural hysteria: projection of anger on an invented adversary. The "hipster" article in Time Out is the best example of this, and it's sloppy editorializing, in my opinion... it shows they don't have a whole lot of interesting material to feature right now.
I'm going to develop this idea more in my blog. I'll keep ya up to date.
I don't know if EB, or anyone, has any more interest in following this strange thread and line of logic, you can check out a follow-up post here:
Operation Hipster Freedom.
This is the most hipster article imaginable..better luck next time, cool kid
"...i'm a fucking philosopher." really? fuck.
Wow! It took you folks a while to find this article! How'd you run across it after it left the front page?
How 'bout some substance? I should go back to posting exclusively in politics. Someone over there occasionally manages to articulate an idea.
I think it's just that you are a hipster - you should be trying to reclaim the word and justify hipsterness, not claim it doesn't exist. More specifically, I'd say you're on your way to becoming a post-irony Believer-reading type hipster.
Neither Bright Eyes nor Wes Anderson are okay.
Yay for sincerity! Do something good! Sheesh.
Fine, fine, I may fit into your personal mold of "hipster," but is that really compatible with post-irony? That's one of the only characteristics of "hipsterism" that really makes sense to me. Time Out specifically said "Under the guise of 'irony,' hipsterism fetishizes the authentic and regurgitates it with a winking inauthenticity."
This doesn't leave a whole lot of room for post-ironic hipsters, in my opinion. Your specific mentioning of Wes Anderson and Bright Eyes is interesting, because I don't see either of those two as particularly ironic (Wes is definitely reserved and intentionally awkward, but his films are pretty sincere). Same with burlesque and post-punk... the few people I know who are interested in those things aren't particularly ironic about it. They're invested in the cultures, largely because they care about the performance and/or the music.
Sometimes I think "hipster" is shorthand for "anything that finds a niche in New York." And that's a lot of stuff.
I WILL agree with you on your last point... yay for sincerity. The more people can manage to totally devote themselves to the things they love, the better we'll all have it.
Disagree completely
I hang out with hipsters, and i'm just beggining to realize it. Intellectual, indie snobs who hang out in cliques. Oh, they're out there. I know.
And i live in Michigan
I have a different take on this. There is no such thing as a hipster these days because it just isn't possible to be hip anymore.
There hasn't been a truly new creative movement for so many years now, just re-treads of what has gone before.
Now that all things cult have just become mundane everyday mass culture, the day of the truly groovy fuckers outside of the mainstream has slipped away into history.
Whilst I miss that to a certain point on a personal level, I'm left feeling unsure as to whether this is a good thing or not and to where it may be leading us.
i find this absolutely hilarious. perhaps everyone should find a brick wall and repeatedly try and move it with their forehead. anyone who does anything because someone or some group says it is cool is a douchebag including hipsters. try doing things because there is nothing else you would rather do. remain unclassified.





Nice piece, and I think you're playing the devil's advocate a bit, but my def of a hipster might include a poseur--someone who takes on the superficial acoutrements of the "artsy." Dilettantes who want to be "artists" without the requisite effort involved. Stuff like that. Irony and a sense of general dissatisfaction with the world helps too.