NEWS

George and the Great Eight: Democrats Debate in Iowa

Written by Heloise
Published August 20, 2007

At the start of this morning's debate, George Stephanopoulos announced that Barack Obama led the pack in the Iowa polls, Hillary Clinton a close second. As the press and this writer have noted, Senator Obama has a target on his back. The first question was about him but not directed to him: “Is Obama ready to be president?”

The Democrats went on the attack: Senator Biden said he was not ready and then George asked Senator Clinton if Senator Obama was ready. She danced around that question (at first) by saying that she was there as a candidate, no negatives. It is important to note that except for Governor Richardson, the remainder has been or are senators. History does not show many examples of senators elected to the presidency. Hillary had this to say about Barack: “naïve and irresponsible — I don’t think a president should give away a ‘bargaining chip’ to anyone.” Barack body language was clear—he was ready for rebuttal.

The other candidates agreed that neither Barack nor anyone “should telegraph intent to our adversaries without precondition.” Dodd (who is polling zero in Iowa) said Obama was “confusing and confused.” Biden on Obama’s readiness: “It was about Pakistan. We have no Pakistan policy but a Musharraf policy. We should be encouraging free elections...I think he can be ready but he is not. There is no on-the-job training for the presidency.” Senator Obama took the criticism like a young Ted Kennedy with who faced a similar charge during his first election and went on to win.

When he was finally given the floor, Obama said: “To prepare for this debate I rode in the bumper cars at the state fair”…applause and laughter. Here are some of his words: “I think there is substantive difference when meeting with our adversaries. We tried the other way it didn’t work. If we have Osama Bin Laden in our sights and have exhausted other options we should take him out.” And he added: “We should describe to the people in debates what our position is about on foreign polity. Aggressive diplomacy…is going to make us safer.”

Next, a clip was shown of Clinton's comments on this same question of military aggression, made two years ago: “No option should be off the table, but I will take nuclear weapons off the table. The Bush administration tried to drum up support for military action for Iraq…bunker buster bombs…this was not a hypothetical…we shouldn’t use hypotheticals (sic)”  Obama defended himself by saying there was no difference between their views. “We do have to deal with that [military] problem…Invasion of Iraq has made worse.”

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
The author is a physics teacher. Please visit The Politikos. Web site highlights the new author as keen observer of humanity, anthropology, occultism, science/research. The online spiritual guru combines spirituality and politics as no other. She is native of Chicago mother of two, grandmother of three. She prefers walking for exercise. Author has B.S., biology and M.A., anthropology, certified science and french teacher.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
George and the Great Eight: Democrats Debate in Iowa
Published: August 20, 2007
Type: News
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Politics: Elections and Candidates, Politics: Government, Politics: U.S., Politics: War and Terrorism
Writer: Heloise
Heloise's BC Writer page
Heloise's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Heloise
Politics: Elections and Candidates
Politics: Government
Politics: U.S.
Politics: War and Terrorism
All Politics Articles
Heloise's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 22, 2007 @ 20:00PM — Lumpy [URL]

Calling these candidates who run the gamut from boring to repugnant the 'great eight' is truly an expression of pure absurdism.

#2 — August 28, 2007 @ 10:54AM — Greg Jones [URL]

Al Sharpton..Jesse Jackson..Black Leaders;
Time to Lead for BARACK !
Greg 'Peace Song' Jones

I regularly listen to talk radio ranging from Air America, which is more progressive or Democratic...to Rush Limbaugh, Dennis Prager and Michael Medved which are Republican....and black radio particularly Warren Ballentine and Rev. Al Sharpton on the Radio 1 Network which is doing a great job of reaching the black community and creating an opportunity for voices nationwide to be heard.
I find it interesting to hear the different views from the hosts....as well as callers nationwide...on the subject of Barack Obama for President. Many of the hosts, even callers, on both Air America and the Republican shows voice massive approval and support of Barack Obama. It's actually quite refreshing to see and hear that so many white Americans are ready for a black president, basically because they feel he is the best choice regarding the issues of America and the world. Now, that's progress.
Then I listen to the Rev. Al Sharpton. First of all, let me state that I greatly admire Rev. Sharpton. The work that he does through his National Action Network is developing into becoming a mighty force in the black community nationwide and I feel that all blacks should be supportive of NAN. But when I listen to Rev. Sharpton talk about Barack Obama's presidential campaign I am totally amazed, shocked and beyond extremely disappointed. I'm almost embarrassed. Here we have Rev. Sharpton, who many blacks, including myself, look at as the number one leader for justice and empowerment in the black community.....and here we have a black man...Barack Obama...who is a very serious, capable, qualified candidate for President of the United States, supported by millions nationwide, with a realistic chance to enter the White House. But instead of rallying, supporting and stating this black historic opportunity as it is....Rev. Sharpton would rather not express his support of Obama at a ll !!! What's wrong with this picture ? I cannot believe that the leader(s) of the black community like Rev. Sharpton and Rev. Jesse Jackson are NOT supportive of what could be the first black president of the United States, ever? That is crazy !!!! (note: Rev. Jackson has quietly declared that he is supporting Obama but has done little or nothing to rally the black community....while polls show Hillary currently receiving more black support than Obama !.....That's CRAZY !) We, as blacks, know that in order for the black communities to rise up out of the muck and mire that permeates, we must all work together....as a family. We know that we always preach that we should be supportive of black achievement, black businesses, our black youth and each other.
If that is the case, that we are to be supportive of each other, which I do believe that to be true, then never has that need been more evident than now. ALL black people should be in absolute support of Barack Obama for President, not just because he's black, but because of his stance, capabilities and qualifications. This should be a period of rallying in the streets, shouting with pride that we have a true opportunity to change history and put a black man in the White House. And this rally cry should be lead by our leaders.
Yes, Rev. Al, Rev. Jackson, the NAACP...ALL black leaders should be sounding the trumpet to inspire all black people to vote for this historic change. Why aren't they ? Rev. Al states that he hasn't heard enough from Obama regarding the issues to make a decision. I find that a bit disingenuous seeing as to how I know where Obama stands on the various issues....and so do the millions of white Obama supporters. Rev. Al also says that Obama may not have enough experience. I find that to be a sadly interesting comment, particularly considering both Rev. Al and Rev. Jackson ran for President with absolutely NO political experience, but never stated that they were too new for the post. (NOTE: Rev. Al knows that Barack Obama has been a U.S. Senator for over 2 years.....and that Abraham Lincoln was a Senator for 2 years....and turned out to be considered one of the greatest Presidents of all time). Rev. Al also states that he is not hearing enough talk from Obama regarding specifically what he will do for the black community. Now common sense should tell all black folks that Obama has to play the political game. Keep in mind, he is running for president of the United States...that means everyone, black, white, hispanic, muslim, jews,and all others.
Obama cannot appear as if he will only be concerned with the black community's needs or he has absolutely no chance of winning. Maybe that's where Rev. Al went wrong with his campaign. Does Rev. Al think that Obama should be shouting 'ungawa...Black Power' during each debate ? There is no way that he could do that and expect to win. But once he is President, common sense tells us that he would be more receptive to the needs in the black community than any other candidate. That's just common sense based on what we DO know about Obama. Then some folks want to say he's not 'black enough'. That is the most pathetic thing I've ever heard. First of all, his name is Barack Obama......not like Jesse or Al. Secondly, Obama is half Kenyan.....that's pretty black !!! Sometimes I just wonder to myself, why aren't Rev. Al and Rev. Jackson leading the rally to support this historic cause ? Could they be jealous that Obama has already achieved more acceptance than they did during their campaign efforts ? I would hate to think that to be the fact. Or, could Rev. Al be hopeful that Hillary will win because he feels that she will assist him in his personal efforts if she is elected President ? I hope that too is not the case.....that would be selling out.....and I would never believe our leader(s) to be sell-outs. But for our leaders to not boisterously support Obama is like saying that they feel a white person would do better or more for the black communities, which history has proven is just not the case. Then what can it be ? That is the question.
I believe that Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would be very proud and thankful to see that, in spite of all of the weights that have burdened and held the black community down, one black man has risen to such a level that he is a viable choice to be President of the United States in 2008. I believe that Rev. King would truly lead a powerful movement to change the tide of history. I envision marches, flags, signs, songs, t-shirts, buttons and millions of blacks proudly expressing jubilee for this opportunity to make a real change in our country.
WE SHALL OVERCOME....has been our motto for the black struggle for many generations and we are still struggling, in oh so many ways. And we will never overcome, until our leaders wake up, stop 'hatin' and vigorously lead the cause that will truly make a positive difference in our country, in our black community, and in the entire world. Rev. Al....Rev. Jackson....love ya' both....but on this subject... It's Time To LEAD !!!
(Greg 'Peace Song' Jones)
www.blacks4barack.homestead.com


(30)
Greg Jones
P.O. Box 43678
Cleveland, Ohio 44143

#3 — August 28, 2007 @ 21:20PM — vwcat

Gregg, Sharpton is a total Hillarybot. Why he is not just saying so is because he knows he would be derided for it. But, everything is all Clinton all the time. he believes Bill is really the black president and will never change.
Unfortunately, Al Sharpton, has become more about himself as time goes on.
I do believe he is extreemly jealous of Obama. You can see it in his eyes. In the way his face gets set when Obama is mentioned.
Obama has come out of nowhere so fast and has become the voice for the younger generation of African Americans. His popularity with other races is something Sharpton has never enjoyed. he is angry because Obama is fast becoming a voice for all people.
He feels the same way some of John Edwards supporters feel. they view Obama as some snot nosed kid who has usurped their rightful place as they see it. that Obama has not paid his dues.
it is the same with the Clintons who have an obsessive dislike of Obama.
today on MSNBC, her advisor Terry Mcauliff said the reason for voting for Hillary is that it is her turn to be president. This is telling. Her turn. Same with those who are trying to undermine the Obama effect. They see it as their turn as they have been around awhile.
But, they also envy Obama's incredible charisma and the love the people of all ages and races have for him. I think as time goes on he will replace Bill Clinton as the most beloved democrat. But, this is because underneath, there was always something opportunistic and corrupt about Clinton that people felt. That he was play acting and really did not care. Obama is authentic. His care and concern for people is genuine. He is honest and decent. He became this loved figure without pretending or compromised on his values or ethics. This is the real deal people have searched and waited for. And now that he is here, people are confused or jealous or cynical about it.
Once Hillary and to some extent, Bill, have been around all the time like now people will remember the exhausted and disillusioned feeling they developed in the 90s. They will remember feeling let down and lied to and the anger after so much lying and corruption. they will remember how the
Clintons sold out the working and middle class.
And they will look to Obama and see his is for real and won't let them down.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/67713)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments