REVIEW

Movie Review: The Bourne Ultimatum - What's In A Name?

Written by Kati Irons
Published August 19, 2007
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

The Bourne Ultimatum ends the same way The Bourne Identity began, with a body floating in the water. I've heard many people say that the end seems to suggest even more sequels to follow, but I don't agree. As cool as the Bourne movies are, and as much as I've enjoyed them, they were always and ultimately about one man's search for his identity. The wet guy in the first movie had no clue who he was or how he got there, but the man who drifts away at the end of Ultimatum knows, finally, who he is and where he's going. As tempting as it is to imagine future sequels and their names (I'm rather fond of The Bourne Catastrophe), continuing the story from this point would transform the character into a comic book hero, instead of the interesting complex mess of a person we've come to appreciate.

That said, now that I've seen The Bourne Ultimatum, I believe I have an answer to the question of who would win in a fight. Jason Bourne could kill James Bond using nothing but a tea towel and a phone book. He would use the vodka from Bond's martini to sterilize his wounds, and limp away, there being no sexy woman in a Ferrari to pick him up.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
I am a film and music librarian for a public library system. Like many of my kind, I suffer from RKS, or Random Knowledge Syndrome. These musings are the inevitable end result of that condition.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: The Bourne Ultimatum - What's In A Name?
Published: August 19, 2007
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Thriller
Writer: Kati Irons
Kati Irons's BC Writer page
Kati Irons's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Kati Irons
Video: Action
Video: Thriller
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 19, 2007 @ 14:16PM — Jay

"..Jason Bourne could kill James Bond using nothing but a tea towel and a phone book. He would use the vodka from Bond's martini to sterilize his wounds, and limp away, there being no sexy woman in a Ferrari to pick him up".


LOL....Yes!!!

#2 — August 19, 2007 @ 14:30PM — Ray Ellis [URL]

LOL--but Batman could dispatch them both before breakfast!

#3 — August 19, 2007 @ 14:51PM — Jay

I don't think so, Batman...like Bond is a gadget freak!

Bourne EATS both of them!

#4 — August 19, 2007 @ 14:55PM — Jay

Bourne would flip Batman's cowl over his head and suffocate him.

#5 — August 19, 2007 @ 14:58PM — Ray Ellis [URL]

ahhh-- but you're forgetting Batman's emergency backup. At night, the Dark Knight wins hands down.

#6 — August 19, 2007 @ 15:09PM — Jay

Yea...Robin Hood to the rescue.

On a serious note, I loved this movie, and now as a complete trilogy, one of the strongest as being successful.

Tense, taut, gripping, riveting, the Bourne series has been an enjoyable ride.



#7 — August 19, 2007 @ 15:33PM — Ray Ellis [URL]

Actually--I was talking about thousands of bats. Robin never counted.

And also, seriously--I haven't seen this one, but I loved the first 2 Bourne films. Looking forward to seeing this one, too.And I hope that let it go gracefully. Generally speaking, if you can make a trilogy work, leave it alone.

#8 — August 19, 2007 @ 15:36PM — Ray Ellis [URL]

BTw, Katie-- enjoyable review. (Where are my manners?) You piqued my interest even more than it was piqued before. In fact, any more piquing, and I'll be bruised for weeks.

#9 — August 19, 2007 @ 15:37PM — Brian aka Guppusmaximus

Good Review...Even Better Movie!

F*ck Batman... Spawn would kill all three and he's even more of a mess mentally. LOL!! Honestly,in reality, I think Bourne would clobber most people because he knows that MMA type sh!t and he uses his surroundings like a goddamn pro!

This movie proves my point that you can make killer sequels. It may take a bit more work and this movie may have its down falls but The Bourne movies were fantastic even if they started out as a remake.

Though I did have a name for a review if this movie sucked... Boring Old Tomato
(Yes, that joke was bad...).

#10 — August 19, 2007 @ 15:52PM — Jay

Ray,

Check this review out... and tell me if this doesn't excite you. I saw the movie on opening night and read this review a week after.

#11 — August 20, 2007 @ 04:09AM — raf

David Webb or Jason Bourne, whatever name he calls himself, is a dick. He wasn't brainwashed. And at the end of it, the sap didn't really remember anything. Some hero, the murdering prick.

#12 — August 20, 2007 @ 22:49PM — Kati [URL]

Wow, RAF, did (the imaginary) Jason Bourne kill your (imaginary) dog? You seem a bit upset there.

I'm not sure how you can argue that he wasn't brainwashed while simultaneously arguing that he didn't get his memory back, the lack of memory being a primary symptom of being brainwashed.

But, clearly, you didn't like the film and that is a-ok, it being a free country and all. You'll excuse the rest of us for enjoying ourselves.

#13 — August 20, 2007 @ 23:05PM — Harold

This quote may illustrate the point...

"...A Jason Bourne who just buys whatever he is told is no use. A Jason Bourne with no moral compunction is a liability. You need moral certainty. You find a true believer, and break him down into trusting you. He then acts with all of the conviction and dedication of a man of service, but none of the questioning attitude..."

Jason Bourne volunteering for the program is a moral act. Bourne shooting the man without any of his questions answered (which he did after two plus days of being awake [and torture]) is not...but he still did it. He committed. That was the decision point, and he made it...."

#14 — August 21, 2007 @ 13:04PM — Kati [URL]

I don't believe I made the argument that Bourne was somehow a hapless victim, certainly I didn't intend to. As I said, he clearly chose to sign on the dotted line. My argument is that the people who created him did not live up to their end of the bargain. Instead of using him (and other agents like him) to keep the world safe from evil doers, they use them to kill inconvenient people before they become public relations problems.

Bourne is clearly morally culpable for the acts he committed. That's why the scene in Russia with the daughter of the couple he killed was so powerful. He apologized, but what did it accomplish? Is he going to wander the world apologizing to everyone ever affected by one of his acts? Would it be remotely useful if he did?

Bourne is a troubled mess, as I say, but he's an entertaining troubled mess. It doesn't mean I'd raise my kids to emulate him.

#15 — August 22, 2007 @ 06:54AM — fred

its a film god freaks

#16 — August 22, 2007 @ 06:55AM — fred

relax

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/67688)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments