REVIEW

TV Review: Damages

Written by Josh Lasser
Published July 23, 2007
page 1 | 2

Like so many serialized dramas, the premiere of Damages asks many more questions than it answers. Sadly though, most of the questions, and how they are asked and shown, fail to entice this viewer. All that is left then in deciding whether or not to watch a follow-up episode are the characters. Are they interesting? Are they well portrayed and well written?

Certainly Glenn Close is fun to watch as Hewes, though she is, just like the story and plot, way over the top. The same is true of her current nemesis, Frobisher. Close and Danson seethe and boil over and play it cool and close to the vest an astonishing number of times.

It can be fun to watch, but the nonsensical questions put forth to the viewer are simply too distracting. The viewer has been dropped into the middle of the second act and the middle of the third act at the same time. There are simply too many dangling threads (and assuredly red herrings).

The premiere episode of Damages is an overly-serialized piece of work. It appears as though it will be absolutely crucial to watch each and every episode if one wants to hope to understand the machinations behind what is taking place. The odds that a viewer could pick it up in the middle of the season and understand the story are slim.

While there are shows that are written in this manner, and some succeed, Damages, in its premiere, fails to provide a sufficiently enticing hook to bring the audience back. There are certainly intriguing questions, but there is also the sense that they will all tie together in some overly convenient and terribly silly way just in time to start a new mystery at the tail end of the season finale. And, as I do not care terribly much about this mystery, I am just not sure I want to stick around to find out about the next one.

page 1 | 2
Josh Lasser, formerly known as "TV and Film Guy," and complete with a Masters Degree in Critical Studies in said areas, gives his opinions on TV, Film, and Entertainment in general. All of which he does in a shameless attempt to try to get paid to do the exact same thing. Josh is also the editor of the Blogcritics Magazine Television Section.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
TV Review: Damages
Published: July 23, 2007
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Crime, Video: Drama, Video: Television
Writer: Josh Lasser
Josh Lasser's BC Writer page
Josh Lasser's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Josh Lasser
Video: Crime
Video: Drama
Video: Television
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 24, 2007 @ 12:22PM — Josh Lasser [URL]

Congratulations! This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States.

#2 — August 7, 2007 @ 01:29AM — john gomes

I stumbled upon the show by accident, thought i would give it a glimpse after seeing non-stop commercials for it. I couldn't get enough.. Glenn close is fantastic!! this is no Shield!! her character is dynamic!! Ted Danson, plays it too soft hearted and i didn't like his character at first, but after these two great episodes i beging to see his characters true nature, despite his vast wealth and power, his nature is not that of a predator.. he seems to be the prey.. The young lawyer is a great choice of innocence and she has done a good job.. Glenn close's character is so dynamic and villianish that the only likeness that immediately comes to mind is "Darth Vader with a smile". Great show and the plot twists so far have left me sitting on the couch with my jaw dropped totally blown away!! if you havnt seen it, I'm sorry!! I love it!!

#3 — August 27, 2007 @ 09:22AM — JerryW

I was all ready for a nice viewing run with Damages. Gleen Close and Ted Danson established her character credibility at the outset, but all those boring 'thirties something' characters who just seem to fill in the dragging conversation spaces between the semi-tense and/or dramatic spots. The show has an irritating stop and start cadence. And I just don't buy the obvious, over dramatised foreshadowing trick of he story line. I suppose it seemed like a good idea at the time but just ends up as bad writing. After the first two whoopie hooks it lost it's impact. I want to keep saying, "Get on with he show". I fell asleep twice in the middle of the show. These TV shows have to give viewers a break from all these male models who can't act. The Sopranos did and look what happened. Now a new kind of gangster show is coming out with all thirties something male models trying to "act" tough. Fuggetit!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/66746)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments